对美国银行资金来源的监管限制:对经纪存款处理的回顾

James R. Barth, Wenling Lu, Yanfei Sun
{"title":"对美国银行资金来源的监管限制:对经纪存款处理的回顾","authors":"James R. Barth, Wenling Lu, Yanfei Sun","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3186872","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is the first paper to provide a comprehensive review of the US regulatory treatment of a relatively recent and controversial source of funds, namely brokered deposits. To do this, we consider the extent to which banks rely on brokered deposits, as well as the impact of these funds on bank performance, bank failures, and bank failure costs. We also consider the changes taking place in technologies and how they continue to affect the way banks obtain funds and provide services to their customers. Our conclusion is that, without sufficient evidence to the contrary, such deposits should be treated no differently from all other deposits and other purchased funds.","PeriodicalId":11689,"journal":{"name":"ERN: Commercial Banks (Topic)","volume":"29 4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Regulatory Restrictions on US Bank Funding Sources: A Review of the Treatment of Brokered Deposits\",\"authors\":\"James R. Barth, Wenling Lu, Yanfei Sun\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3186872\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper is the first paper to provide a comprehensive review of the US regulatory treatment of a relatively recent and controversial source of funds, namely brokered deposits. To do this, we consider the extent to which banks rely on brokered deposits, as well as the impact of these funds on bank performance, bank failures, and bank failure costs. We also consider the changes taking place in technologies and how they continue to affect the way banks obtain funds and provide services to their customers. Our conclusion is that, without sufficient evidence to the contrary, such deposits should be treated no differently from all other deposits and other purchased funds.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11689,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ERN: Commercial Banks (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"29 4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ERN: Commercial Banks (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3186872\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ERN: Commercial Banks (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3186872","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

这篇论文是第一篇全面回顾美国对一种相对较新的、有争议的资金来源(即经纪存款)的监管处理的论文。为此,我们考虑了银行对中介存款的依赖程度,以及这些资金对银行业绩、银行倒闭和银行倒闭成本的影响。我们还考虑了技术方面正在发生的变化,以及它们如何继续影响银行获取资金和向客户提供服务的方式。我们的结论是,在没有充分相反证据的情况下,此类存款不应与所有其他存款和其他购买基金区别对待。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Regulatory Restrictions on US Bank Funding Sources: A Review of the Treatment of Brokered Deposits
This paper is the first paper to provide a comprehensive review of the US regulatory treatment of a relatively recent and controversial source of funds, namely brokered deposits. To do this, we consider the extent to which banks rely on brokered deposits, as well as the impact of these funds on bank performance, bank failures, and bank failure costs. We also consider the changes taking place in technologies and how they continue to affect the way banks obtain funds and provide services to their customers. Our conclusion is that, without sufficient evidence to the contrary, such deposits should be treated no differently from all other deposits and other purchased funds.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Banks’ Interest Rate Setting and Transitions between Liquidity Surplus and Deficit ECB Monetary Policy and Bank Default Risk Bank Regulation and Market Discipline in the Presence of Risk-Shifting Incentives 'Negative-For-Long' Interest Rates and Customer Deposit Rate Anticipatory effects around proposed regulation: Evidence from Basel III
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1