A.R. Hale, M. de Loor, D. van Drimmelen, G. Huppes
{"title":"安全标准,风险分析和预防措施的决策:一些最近的欧洲立法和标准的影响","authors":"A.R. Hale, M. de Loor, D. van Drimmelen, G. Huppes","doi":"10.1016/0376-6349(90)90022-N","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Hale, A.R., de Loor, M., van Drimmelen, D. and Huppes, G., 1990. Safety standards, risk analysis and decision making on prevention measures: implications of some recent European legislation and standards. <em>Journal of Occupational Accidents</em>, 13: 213–231.</p><p>Legislation on industrial safety in many countries contains several different ways of phrasing its requirements: — either as exposure or risk standards which have to be met; — or as specific requirements to apply specified prevention measures — or as general requirements to put into effect measures belonging to ‘the state of the art’ in so far as those can reasonably be required of the employer or designer.</p><p>A new approach to European standardisation of machinery safety is in the process of putting forward a standard of good design practice as an umbrella for specific machinery standards, which fits this last approach. In placing a general requirement of good practice on Industry there is an implication that manufacturers and employers should be able to demonstrate that their decisions are based upon sound analysis of risk which they or others have conducted.</p><p>The paper presents a discussion of the implications of recent European legislation on machinery safety and of the Dutch Working Environment Law on the structuring of such a systematic approach. Emphasis is placed on the use of standards based on “the state of the art” in prevention. The options open for government to facilitate and influence the decision making steps related to risk assessment are also discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100816,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Accidents","volume":"13 3","pages":"Pages 213-231"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0376-6349(90)90022-N","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety standards, risk analysis and decision making on prevention measures: implications of some recent European legislation and standards\",\"authors\":\"A.R. Hale, M. de Loor, D. van Drimmelen, G. Huppes\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0376-6349(90)90022-N\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Hale, A.R., de Loor, M., van Drimmelen, D. and Huppes, G., 1990. Safety standards, risk analysis and decision making on prevention measures: implications of some recent European legislation and standards. <em>Journal of Occupational Accidents</em>, 13: 213–231.</p><p>Legislation on industrial safety in many countries contains several different ways of phrasing its requirements: — either as exposure or risk standards which have to be met; — or as specific requirements to apply specified prevention measures — or as general requirements to put into effect measures belonging to ‘the state of the art’ in so far as those can reasonably be required of the employer or designer.</p><p>A new approach to European standardisation of machinery safety is in the process of putting forward a standard of good design practice as an umbrella for specific machinery standards, which fits this last approach. In placing a general requirement of good practice on Industry there is an implication that manufacturers and employers should be able to demonstrate that their decisions are based upon sound analysis of risk which they or others have conducted.</p><p>The paper presents a discussion of the implications of recent European legislation on machinery safety and of the Dutch Working Environment Law on the structuring of such a systematic approach. Emphasis is placed on the use of standards based on “the state of the art” in prevention. The options open for government to facilitate and influence the decision making steps related to risk assessment are also discussed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100816,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Occupational Accidents\",\"volume\":\"13 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 213-231\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0376-6349(90)90022-N\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Occupational Accidents\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/037663499090022N\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Accidents","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/037663499090022N","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11
摘要
Hale, a.r., de Loor, M., van Drimmelen, D.和Huppes, G., 1990。安全标准,风险分析和预防措施的决策:一些最近的欧洲立法和标准的影响。职业事故学报,13(3):213-231。许多国家关于工业安全的立法有几种不同的表述其要求的方式:-要么是必须达到的暴露或风险标准;-或作为实施特定预防措施的具体要求-或作为实施属于“最新技术”的措施的一般要求,只要这些措施可以合理地要求雇主或设计师。欧洲机械安全标准化的一种新方法是提出一种良好设计规范标准,作为特定机械标准的保护伞,它适合最后一种方法。在对工业提出良好做法的一般要求时,意味着制造商和雇主应该能够证明他们的决定是基于他们或其他人对风险进行的合理分析。本文介绍了最近欧洲立法对机械安全的影响和荷兰工作环境法对这种系统方法的结构的讨论。重点是在预防方面使用基于“最先进水平”的标准。还讨论了政府促进和影响与风险评估有关的决策步骤的各种选择。
Safety standards, risk analysis and decision making on prevention measures: implications of some recent European legislation and standards
Hale, A.R., de Loor, M., van Drimmelen, D. and Huppes, G., 1990. Safety standards, risk analysis and decision making on prevention measures: implications of some recent European legislation and standards. Journal of Occupational Accidents, 13: 213–231.
Legislation on industrial safety in many countries contains several different ways of phrasing its requirements: — either as exposure or risk standards which have to be met; — or as specific requirements to apply specified prevention measures — or as general requirements to put into effect measures belonging to ‘the state of the art’ in so far as those can reasonably be required of the employer or designer.
A new approach to European standardisation of machinery safety is in the process of putting forward a standard of good design practice as an umbrella for specific machinery standards, which fits this last approach. In placing a general requirement of good practice on Industry there is an implication that manufacturers and employers should be able to demonstrate that their decisions are based upon sound analysis of risk which they or others have conducted.
The paper presents a discussion of the implications of recent European legislation on machinery safety and of the Dutch Working Environment Law on the structuring of such a systematic approach. Emphasis is placed on the use of standards based on “the state of the art” in prevention. The options open for government to facilitate and influence the decision making steps related to risk assessment are also discussed.