安全标准,风险分析和预防措施的决策:一些最近的欧洲立法和标准的影响

A.R. Hale, M. de Loor, D. van Drimmelen, G. Huppes
{"title":"安全标准,风险分析和预防措施的决策:一些最近的欧洲立法和标准的影响","authors":"A.R. Hale,&nbsp;M. de Loor,&nbsp;D. van Drimmelen,&nbsp;G. Huppes","doi":"10.1016/0376-6349(90)90022-N","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Hale, A.R., de Loor, M., van Drimmelen, D. and Huppes, G., 1990. Safety standards, risk analysis and decision making on prevention measures: implications of some recent European legislation and standards. <em>Journal of Occupational Accidents</em>, 13: 213–231.</p><p>Legislation on industrial safety in many countries contains several different ways of phrasing its requirements: — either as exposure or risk standards which have to be met; — or as specific requirements to apply specified prevention measures — or as general requirements to put into effect measures belonging to ‘the state of the art’ in so far as those can reasonably be required of the employer or designer.</p><p>A new approach to European standardisation of machinery safety is in the process of putting forward a standard of good design practice as an umbrella for specific machinery standards, which fits this last approach. In placing a general requirement of good practice on Industry there is an implication that manufacturers and employers should be able to demonstrate that their decisions are based upon sound analysis of risk which they or others have conducted.</p><p>The paper presents a discussion of the implications of recent European legislation on machinery safety and of the Dutch Working Environment Law on the structuring of such a systematic approach. Emphasis is placed on the use of standards based on “the state of the art” in prevention. The options open for government to facilitate and influence the decision making steps related to risk assessment are also discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100816,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Occupational Accidents","volume":"13 3","pages":"Pages 213-231"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0376-6349(90)90022-N","citationCount":"11","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Safety standards, risk analysis and decision making on prevention measures: implications of some recent European legislation and standards\",\"authors\":\"A.R. Hale,&nbsp;M. de Loor,&nbsp;D. van Drimmelen,&nbsp;G. Huppes\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0376-6349(90)90022-N\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Hale, A.R., de Loor, M., van Drimmelen, D. and Huppes, G., 1990. Safety standards, risk analysis and decision making on prevention measures: implications of some recent European legislation and standards. <em>Journal of Occupational Accidents</em>, 13: 213–231.</p><p>Legislation on industrial safety in many countries contains several different ways of phrasing its requirements: — either as exposure or risk standards which have to be met; — or as specific requirements to apply specified prevention measures — or as general requirements to put into effect measures belonging to ‘the state of the art’ in so far as those can reasonably be required of the employer or designer.</p><p>A new approach to European standardisation of machinery safety is in the process of putting forward a standard of good design practice as an umbrella for specific machinery standards, which fits this last approach. In placing a general requirement of good practice on Industry there is an implication that manufacturers and employers should be able to demonstrate that their decisions are based upon sound analysis of risk which they or others have conducted.</p><p>The paper presents a discussion of the implications of recent European legislation on machinery safety and of the Dutch Working Environment Law on the structuring of such a systematic approach. Emphasis is placed on the use of standards based on “the state of the art” in prevention. The options open for government to facilitate and influence the decision making steps related to risk assessment are also discussed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100816,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Occupational Accidents\",\"volume\":\"13 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 213-231\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0376-6349(90)90022-N\",\"citationCount\":\"11\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Occupational Accidents\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/037663499090022N\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Occupational Accidents","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/037663499090022N","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

摘要

Hale, a.r., de Loor, M., van Drimmelen, D.和Huppes, G., 1990。安全标准,风险分析和预防措施的决策:一些最近的欧洲立法和标准的影响。职业事故学报,13(3):213-231。许多国家关于工业安全的立法有几种不同的表述其要求的方式:-要么是必须达到的暴露或风险标准;-或作为实施特定预防措施的具体要求-或作为实施属于“最新技术”的措施的一般要求,只要这些措施可以合理地要求雇主或设计师。欧洲机械安全标准化的一种新方法是提出一种良好设计规范标准,作为特定机械标准的保护伞,它适合最后一种方法。在对工业提出良好做法的一般要求时,意味着制造商和雇主应该能够证明他们的决定是基于他们或其他人对风险进行的合理分析。本文介绍了最近欧洲立法对机械安全的影响和荷兰工作环境法对这种系统方法的结构的讨论。重点是在预防方面使用基于“最先进水平”的标准。还讨论了政府促进和影响与风险评估有关的决策步骤的各种选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Safety standards, risk analysis and decision making on prevention measures: implications of some recent European legislation and standards

Hale, A.R., de Loor, M., van Drimmelen, D. and Huppes, G., 1990. Safety standards, risk analysis and decision making on prevention measures: implications of some recent European legislation and standards. Journal of Occupational Accidents, 13: 213–231.

Legislation on industrial safety in many countries contains several different ways of phrasing its requirements: — either as exposure or risk standards which have to be met; — or as specific requirements to apply specified prevention measures — or as general requirements to put into effect measures belonging to ‘the state of the art’ in so far as those can reasonably be required of the employer or designer.

A new approach to European standardisation of machinery safety is in the process of putting forward a standard of good design practice as an umbrella for specific machinery standards, which fits this last approach. In placing a general requirement of good practice on Industry there is an implication that manufacturers and employers should be able to demonstrate that their decisions are based upon sound analysis of risk which they or others have conducted.

The paper presents a discussion of the implications of recent European legislation on machinery safety and of the Dutch Working Environment Law on the structuring of such a systematic approach. Emphasis is placed on the use of standards based on “the state of the art” in prevention. The options open for government to facilitate and influence the decision making steps related to risk assessment are also discussed.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The physiology of work Physical ergonomics job design: an accident prevention approach to control upper extremity cumulative trauma disorders in manufacturing industry An indirect cost theory of work accident prevention Slip resistance versus surface roughness of deck and other underfoot surfaces in ships An international comparison of test methods for determining the slip resistance of shoes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1