作为明智经济学的性别敏感预算:波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那与马其顿共和国的比较分析

Merima Avdagic, Faruk Hujic
{"title":"作为明智经济学的性别敏感预算:波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那与马其顿共和国的比较分析","authors":"Merima Avdagic, Faruk Hujic","doi":"10.14706/JECOSS11229","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper addresses a comparative analysis of two different frameworks for inclusion of gender in fiscal economics through gender responsive budgeting(GRB) initiatives that took place over one decade - from 2000 till 2010 in two former Yugoslavian republics: Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) and Republic of Macedonia (Macedonia). Namely the comparison of two countries with two different methods for GRB is depicted: a) Case of BiH where GRB was introduced through overall public finance management (PFM) reform within the realm of program based budgeting, versus b) Case of Macedonia where GRB was introduced through specific program level initiatives and interventions without an overall integration with budgetary system and performance budgeting as a baseline concept. The paper analyzes these two approaches, and provides an argument and evidence for concluding that the introduction of gender sensitive budgeting through an overarching PFM reforms a more practical and comprehensive mechanism. It suggests that GRB can be used as a tool for more efficient and equitable policy and budget making decisions, and that the capacity level directly affects the absorption capacity, level of implementation and overall sustainability. Furthermore, due to the transition from social regime toward open market parliamentary democracies that Balkan countries are experiencing, integration of GRB practices within the PFM reforms is an attractive model given that those reforms are already taking place. Gender equality through GRB mainstreamed through PFM reforms supports contributes to overall socio-economic prosperity.","PeriodicalId":52427,"journal":{"name":"Nigerian Journal of Economic and Social Studies","volume":"8 1","pages":"197-217"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gender Responsive Budgeting as Smart Economics: A Comparative Analysis between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republic of Macedonia\",\"authors\":\"Merima Avdagic, Faruk Hujic\",\"doi\":\"10.14706/JECOSS11229\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper addresses a comparative analysis of two different frameworks for inclusion of gender in fiscal economics through gender responsive budgeting(GRB) initiatives that took place over one decade - from 2000 till 2010 in two former Yugoslavian republics: Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) and Republic of Macedonia (Macedonia). Namely the comparison of two countries with two different methods for GRB is depicted: a) Case of BiH where GRB was introduced through overall public finance management (PFM) reform within the realm of program based budgeting, versus b) Case of Macedonia where GRB was introduced through specific program level initiatives and interventions without an overall integration with budgetary system and performance budgeting as a baseline concept. The paper analyzes these two approaches, and provides an argument and evidence for concluding that the introduction of gender sensitive budgeting through an overarching PFM reforms a more practical and comprehensive mechanism. It suggests that GRB can be used as a tool for more efficient and equitable policy and budget making decisions, and that the capacity level directly affects the absorption capacity, level of implementation and overall sustainability. Furthermore, due to the transition from social regime toward open market parliamentary democracies that Balkan countries are experiencing, integration of GRB practices within the PFM reforms is an attractive model given that those reforms are already taking place. Gender equality through GRB mainstreamed through PFM reforms supports contributes to overall socio-economic prosperity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52427,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nigerian Journal of Economic and Social Studies\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"197-217\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-06-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nigerian Journal of Economic and Social Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14706/JECOSS11229\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nigerian Journal of Economic and Social Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14706/JECOSS11229","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本文对两种不同的框架进行了比较分析,这些框架通过促进性别平等预算(GRB)倡议将性别纳入财政经济学,这两种框架在2000年至2010年的十多年间在两个前南斯拉夫共和国:波斯尼亚和黑塞哥维那(波黑)和马其顿共和国(马其顿)实施。也就是说,本文描述了两个国家采用两种不同的GRB方法的比较:a)波黑的情况下,GRB是通过基于计划的预算领域内的全面公共财政管理(PFM)改革引入的;b)马其顿的情况下,GRB是通过具体的计划层面的举措和干预措施引入的,而没有将预算系统和绩效预算作为基准概念进行全面整合。本文分析了这两种方法,并提供了一个论据和证据,以得出结论,通过全面的方案管理引入对性别问题敏感的预算编制改革了一个更实际和全面的机制。研究表明,GRB可以作为一种更有效和公平的政策和预算决策工具,能力水平直接影响吸收能力、实施水平和总体可持续性。此外,由于巴尔干国家正在经历从社会制度向开放市场议会民主国家的过渡,将GRB做法纳入PFM改革是一个有吸引力的模式,因为这些改革已经在进行中。通过减贫机制改革支持的性别平等主流化,有助于促进社会经济的全面繁荣。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gender Responsive Budgeting as Smart Economics: A Comparative Analysis between Bosnia and Herzegovina and Republic of Macedonia
This paper addresses a comparative analysis of two different frameworks for inclusion of gender in fiscal economics through gender responsive budgeting(GRB) initiatives that took place over one decade - from 2000 till 2010 in two former Yugoslavian republics: Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) and Republic of Macedonia (Macedonia). Namely the comparison of two countries with two different methods for GRB is depicted: a) Case of BiH where GRB was introduced through overall public finance management (PFM) reform within the realm of program based budgeting, versus b) Case of Macedonia where GRB was introduced through specific program level initiatives and interventions without an overall integration with budgetary system and performance budgeting as a baseline concept. The paper analyzes these two approaches, and provides an argument and evidence for concluding that the introduction of gender sensitive budgeting through an overarching PFM reforms a more practical and comprehensive mechanism. It suggests that GRB can be used as a tool for more efficient and equitable policy and budget making decisions, and that the capacity level directly affects the absorption capacity, level of implementation and overall sustainability. Furthermore, due to the transition from social regime toward open market parliamentary democracies that Balkan countries are experiencing, integration of GRB practices within the PFM reforms is an attractive model given that those reforms are already taking place. Gender equality through GRB mainstreamed through PFM reforms supports contributes to overall socio-economic prosperity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Nigerian Journal of Economic and Social Studies
Nigerian Journal of Economic and Social Studies Social Sciences-Social Sciences (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
THE USE AND EFFECTIVENESS OF ACCOUNTING INFORMATION SYSTEMS IN TRANSITION ECONOMIES Effect of fiscal expansion on inflation during the period of unconventional monetary policy Causes and Consequences of the World Financial Crisis 2008: A Historical Perspective The Investments Efficiency Toward Economic Growth: ICOR of the Republic of Croatia and Slovenia - Comparative Analysis India and China in the Indian Ocean: Changing Dimensions of Maritime Strategy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1