{"title":"下一代攻击机概念设计研究","authors":"Daniel P. Raymer","doi":"10.1016/S1369-8869(98)00005-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Current Air Force, Navy, and Marine Corps fighter/attack aviation aircraft are 1970s-vintage designs which will reach the ends of their service lives in the early part of the next century. While the Air Force is developing the highly-advanced F-22, it cannot be used to replace all current assets, especially F-16’s, simply due to cost. A “low-end” complementary design is required, much as the F-16 was the “low” of a “high-low mix” with F-15’s. The Navy’s F-18 E/F will have improved characteristics compared to earlier versions, but it does not fully utilize newer technologies and specifically will not have the attainable levels of stealth and range-payload performance, nor will it offer next-generation STOVL capability for the Marines. RAND’s Project Air Force conducted research into the tradeoffs in requirements specification for a next-generation attack fighter during the period from 1993 to 1995. As a part of that, this author developed and analyzed a representative notional design concept for a Next-Generation Attack Fighter (NGAF), then conducting trade studies of range, performance, payload, and technologies, followed by study of alternative approaches to attaining tri-service capability.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100070,"journal":{"name":"Aircraft Design","volume":"1 1","pages":"Pages 43-49"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1998-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1369-8869(98)00005-6","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Next generation attack fighter conceptual design study\",\"authors\":\"Daniel P. Raymer\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1369-8869(98)00005-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Current Air Force, Navy, and Marine Corps fighter/attack aviation aircraft are 1970s-vintage designs which will reach the ends of their service lives in the early part of the next century. While the Air Force is developing the highly-advanced F-22, it cannot be used to replace all current assets, especially F-16’s, simply due to cost. A “low-end” complementary design is required, much as the F-16 was the “low” of a “high-low mix” with F-15’s. The Navy’s F-18 E/F will have improved characteristics compared to earlier versions, but it does not fully utilize newer technologies and specifically will not have the attainable levels of stealth and range-payload performance, nor will it offer next-generation STOVL capability for the Marines. RAND’s Project Air Force conducted research into the tradeoffs in requirements specification for a next-generation attack fighter during the period from 1993 to 1995. As a part of that, this author developed and analyzed a representative notional design concept for a Next-Generation Attack Fighter (NGAF), then conducting trade studies of range, performance, payload, and technologies, followed by study of alternative approaches to attaining tri-service capability.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100070,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aircraft Design\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"Pages 43-49\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1998-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1369-8869(98)00005-6\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aircraft Design\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369886998000056\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aircraft Design","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1369886998000056","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Next generation attack fighter conceptual design study
Current Air Force, Navy, and Marine Corps fighter/attack aviation aircraft are 1970s-vintage designs which will reach the ends of their service lives in the early part of the next century. While the Air Force is developing the highly-advanced F-22, it cannot be used to replace all current assets, especially F-16’s, simply due to cost. A “low-end” complementary design is required, much as the F-16 was the “low” of a “high-low mix” with F-15’s. The Navy’s F-18 E/F will have improved characteristics compared to earlier versions, but it does not fully utilize newer technologies and specifically will not have the attainable levels of stealth and range-payload performance, nor will it offer next-generation STOVL capability for the Marines. RAND’s Project Air Force conducted research into the tradeoffs in requirements specification for a next-generation attack fighter during the period from 1993 to 1995. As a part of that, this author developed and analyzed a representative notional design concept for a Next-Generation Attack Fighter (NGAF), then conducting trade studies of range, performance, payload, and technologies, followed by study of alternative approaches to attaining tri-service capability.