珍贵的关系:与新西兰奥特罗阿的taonga植物建立伙伴关系和保护Māori关系

David J. Jefferson
{"title":"珍贵的关系:与新西兰奥特罗阿的taonga植物建立伙伴关系和保护Māori关系","authors":"David J. Jefferson","doi":"10.1111/jwip.12226","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>For more than three decades, the system of intellectual property for plants in Aotearoa New Zealand has been the subject of controversy. Critics claim that the system fails to fulfil the promises of the nation's founding document, <i>Te Tiriti o Waitangi</i>|<i>The Treaty of Waitangi</i> (1840), which guarantees that Māori will retain <i>tino rangatiratanga</i> (absolute sovereignty) over their <i>taonga</i> (treasured and significant) plant species. The 2021 Plant Variety Rights Bill aims to address this concern while also complying with international obligations that New Zealand undertook when it joined the <i>Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership</i> (2018). Thus, the Bill endeavours to uphold the government's commitments under Te Tiriti and to give effect to the 1991 Act of the UPOV Convention. These plural and sometimes divergent goals manifest a deeper tension that underlies how legal systems in Aotearoa New Zealand conceptualise human relationships with nonhuman beings and environments. While a Pākehā (Western/European) approach to intellectual property conceives of plants as alienable economic objects, <i>tikanga Māori</i> (customary protocols and values) understands that like humans, plants possess <i>mauri</i> (life force) and <i>whakapapa</i> (genealogy) that connect these beings with the environments they inhabit. This article explores how tensions between ontological, legal, and political systems imbue the Plant Variety Rights Bill. While the proposal represents a progressive reform, it may fall short of living up to its aspirations for authentic partnership between Māori and the Crown.</p>","PeriodicalId":54129,"journal":{"name":"Journal of World Intellectual Property","volume":"25 2","pages":"347-374"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jwip.12226","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Treasured relations: Towards partnership and the protection of Māori relationships with taonga plants in Aotearoa New Zealand\",\"authors\":\"David J. Jefferson\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jwip.12226\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>For more than three decades, the system of intellectual property for plants in Aotearoa New Zealand has been the subject of controversy. Critics claim that the system fails to fulfil the promises of the nation's founding document, <i>Te Tiriti o Waitangi</i>|<i>The Treaty of Waitangi</i> (1840), which guarantees that Māori will retain <i>tino rangatiratanga</i> (absolute sovereignty) over their <i>taonga</i> (treasured and significant) plant species. The 2021 Plant Variety Rights Bill aims to address this concern while also complying with international obligations that New Zealand undertook when it joined the <i>Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership</i> (2018). Thus, the Bill endeavours to uphold the government's commitments under Te Tiriti and to give effect to the 1991 Act of the UPOV Convention. These plural and sometimes divergent goals manifest a deeper tension that underlies how legal systems in Aotearoa New Zealand conceptualise human relationships with nonhuman beings and environments. While a Pākehā (Western/European) approach to intellectual property conceives of plants as alienable economic objects, <i>tikanga Māori</i> (customary protocols and values) understands that like humans, plants possess <i>mauri</i> (life force) and <i>whakapapa</i> (genealogy) that connect these beings with the environments they inhabit. This article explores how tensions between ontological, legal, and political systems imbue the Plant Variety Rights Bill. While the proposal represents a progressive reform, it may fall short of living up to its aspirations for authentic partnership between Māori and the Crown.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of World Intellectual Property\",\"volume\":\"25 2\",\"pages\":\"347-374\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jwip.12226\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of World Intellectual Property\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jwip.12226\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of World Intellectual Property","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jwip.12226","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

30多年来,新西兰奥特罗阿的植物知识产权制度一直是争议的主题。批评人士声称,该制度未能履行国家创始文件《怀唐伊条约》(1840年)的承诺,该条约保证Māori将保留对其taonga(珍贵而重要的)植物物种的绝对主权。《2021年植物品种权法案》旨在解决这一问题,同时也遵守新西兰加入《全面与进步跨太平洋伙伴关系协定》(2018年)时承担的国际义务。因此,该法案努力维护政府根据《提里提法》所作的承诺,并使1991年《UPOV公约法》生效。这些多元的,有时是不同的目标表明了一种更深层次的紧张关系,这种紧张关系是新西兰奥特罗阿法律体系如何将人类与非人类和环境的关系概念化的基础。虽然Pākehā(西方/欧洲)的知识产权方法将植物视为可转让的经济对象,但tikanga Māori(习惯协议和价值观)认为,像人类一样,植物拥有mauri(生命力)和whakapapa(谱系),将这些生物与它们所居住的环境联系起来。本文探讨了本体论、法律和政治制度之间的紧张关系如何渗透到植物品种权利法案中。虽然该提案代表了一项渐进式改革,但它可能无法实现Māori与王室之间真正合作的愿望。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Treasured relations: Towards partnership and the protection of Māori relationships with taonga plants in Aotearoa New Zealand

For more than three decades, the system of intellectual property for plants in Aotearoa New Zealand has been the subject of controversy. Critics claim that the system fails to fulfil the promises of the nation's founding document, Te Tiriti o Waitangi|The Treaty of Waitangi (1840), which guarantees that Māori will retain tino rangatiratanga (absolute sovereignty) over their taonga (treasured and significant) plant species. The 2021 Plant Variety Rights Bill aims to address this concern while also complying with international obligations that New Zealand undertook when it joined the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (2018). Thus, the Bill endeavours to uphold the government's commitments under Te Tiriti and to give effect to the 1991 Act of the UPOV Convention. These plural and sometimes divergent goals manifest a deeper tension that underlies how legal systems in Aotearoa New Zealand conceptualise human relationships with nonhuman beings and environments. While a Pākehā (Western/European) approach to intellectual property conceives of plants as alienable economic objects, tikanga Māori (customary protocols and values) understands that like humans, plants possess mauri (life force) and whakapapa (genealogy) that connect these beings with the environments they inhabit. This article explores how tensions between ontological, legal, and political systems imbue the Plant Variety Rights Bill. While the proposal represents a progressive reform, it may fall short of living up to its aspirations for authentic partnership between Māori and the Crown.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Issue Information The flexibilization of intellectual property rights in cases of health crises: A case study of Brazil in the face of the AIDS and COVID sanitary crises Factors influencing the prioritisation of access to medicines in trade-related intellectual property policymaking in Thailand Law libraries, copyright and digital lending
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1