Munish Khanna, Abhishek Toofani, Siddharth Bansal, M. Asif
{"title":"软件故障预测中各种算法的性能比较","authors":"Munish Khanna, Abhishek Toofani, Siddharth Bansal, M. Asif","doi":"10.4018/IJGHPC.2021040105","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Producing software of high quality is challenging in view of the large volume, size, and complexity of the developed software. Checking the software for faults in the early phases helps to bring down testing resources. This empirical study explores the performance of different machine learning model, fuzzy logic algorithms against the problem of predicting software fault proneness. The work experiments on the public domain KC1 NASA data set. Performance of different methods of fault prediction is evaluated using parameters such as receiver characteristics (ROC) analysis and RMS (root mean squared), etc. Comparison is made among different algorithms/models using such results which are presented in this paper.","PeriodicalId":43565,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Grid and High Performance Computing","volume":"193 1","pages":"70-94"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Performance Comparison of Various Algorithms During Software Fault Prediction\",\"authors\":\"Munish Khanna, Abhishek Toofani, Siddharth Bansal, M. Asif\",\"doi\":\"10.4018/IJGHPC.2021040105\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Producing software of high quality is challenging in view of the large volume, size, and complexity of the developed software. Checking the software for faults in the early phases helps to bring down testing resources. This empirical study explores the performance of different machine learning model, fuzzy logic algorithms against the problem of predicting software fault proneness. The work experiments on the public domain KC1 NASA data set. Performance of different methods of fault prediction is evaluated using parameters such as receiver characteristics (ROC) analysis and RMS (root mean squared), etc. Comparison is made among different algorithms/models using such results which are presented in this paper.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43565,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Grid and High Performance Computing\",\"volume\":\"193 1\",\"pages\":\"70-94\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Grid and High Performance Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4018/IJGHPC.2021040105\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Grid and High Performance Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4018/IJGHPC.2021040105","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMPUTER SCIENCE, THEORY & METHODS","Score":null,"Total":0}
Performance Comparison of Various Algorithms During Software Fault Prediction
Producing software of high quality is challenging in view of the large volume, size, and complexity of the developed software. Checking the software for faults in the early phases helps to bring down testing resources. This empirical study explores the performance of different machine learning model, fuzzy logic algorithms against the problem of predicting software fault proneness. The work experiments on the public domain KC1 NASA data set. Performance of different methods of fault prediction is evaluated using parameters such as receiver characteristics (ROC) analysis and RMS (root mean squared), etc. Comparison is made among different algorithms/models using such results which are presented in this paper.