经动脉热化疗在肝癌中的临床应用

Yang Jijin, Kong Qingde, Tiang Jianming, Li Zhao-shen, M. Yulin, Gao Xinjun, Zhou Wenliang
{"title":"经动脉热化疗在肝癌中的临床应用","authors":"Yang Jijin, Kong Qingde, Tiang Jianming, Li Zhao-shen, M. Yulin, Gao Xinjun, Zhou Wenliang","doi":"10.1046/J.1443-9573.2000.00011.X","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness and safety of transhepatic arterial infusion with warm chemotherapeutic agents in treating hepatic cancer. \n \n \n \nMETHODS: Thirty-five cases of hepatic cancer were treated with transhepatic arterial thermochemotherapy. Lipiodol, 5-Fu and carbonplatinum were warmed to 60–65°C before infusion into the hepatic arteries. Nine patients had two or more treatments and the effectiveness of this treatment was compared with that observed in 14 patients who received ordinary interventional treatment within the same period. Four patients had their tumors removed 2–3 months later and the pathological results were compared with those of four other patients who received regular treatment. \n \n \n \nRESULTS: The tumor growth rate of the thermochemotherapy group was –10 ± 33.3%, while that of the control group was 36.4 ± 59.0%, a statistically significant difference. The tumor necrosis rates on the axial sections of the resected samples were 93.5%± 5.97% and 73.5%± 28.3%, respectively, but the difference was not statistically significant. Microscopically, the pathological changes in the two groups were similar. Only one patient in each group had arterial injury. Comparing the thermochemotherapy group (19 cases) with the control group (22 cases), all of whom received ‘sandwich’ therapy, we found that the prevalence of mild–moderate adverse effects was 72.7 and 63.6%, respectively, while that of severe adverse effects was 26.3 and 37.4%, respectively. However, these differences were of no statistical significance. \n \n \n \nCONCLUSIONS: Transhepatic arterial perfusion of warmed Lipiodol and chemotherapeutic agents (60–65°C) combined with hepatic arterial embolization with gelfoam is a simple and safe method for treating hepatic cancer. It can markedly enhance the effectiveness of simple transarterial interventional therapy.","PeriodicalId":10082,"journal":{"name":"Chinese journal of digestive diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2000-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical application of transarterial thermochemotherapy in hepatic cancer\",\"authors\":\"Yang Jijin, Kong Qingde, Tiang Jianming, Li Zhao-shen, M. Yulin, Gao Xinjun, Zhou Wenliang\",\"doi\":\"10.1046/J.1443-9573.2000.00011.X\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness and safety of transhepatic arterial infusion with warm chemotherapeutic agents in treating hepatic cancer. \\n \\n \\n \\nMETHODS: Thirty-five cases of hepatic cancer were treated with transhepatic arterial thermochemotherapy. Lipiodol, 5-Fu and carbonplatinum were warmed to 60–65°C before infusion into the hepatic arteries. Nine patients had two or more treatments and the effectiveness of this treatment was compared with that observed in 14 patients who received ordinary interventional treatment within the same period. Four patients had their tumors removed 2–3 months later and the pathological results were compared with those of four other patients who received regular treatment. \\n \\n \\n \\nRESULTS: The tumor growth rate of the thermochemotherapy group was –10 ± 33.3%, while that of the control group was 36.4 ± 59.0%, a statistically significant difference. The tumor necrosis rates on the axial sections of the resected samples were 93.5%± 5.97% and 73.5%± 28.3%, respectively, but the difference was not statistically significant. Microscopically, the pathological changes in the two groups were similar. Only one patient in each group had arterial injury. Comparing the thermochemotherapy group (19 cases) with the control group (22 cases), all of whom received ‘sandwich’ therapy, we found that the prevalence of mild–moderate adverse effects was 72.7 and 63.6%, respectively, while that of severe adverse effects was 26.3 and 37.4%, respectively. However, these differences were of no statistical significance. \\n \\n \\n \\nCONCLUSIONS: Transhepatic arterial perfusion of warmed Lipiodol and chemotherapeutic agents (60–65°C) combined with hepatic arterial embolization with gelfoam is a simple and safe method for treating hepatic cancer. It can markedly enhance the effectiveness of simple transarterial interventional therapy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10082,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Chinese journal of digestive diseases\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2000-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Chinese journal of digestive diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1443-9573.2000.00011.X\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Chinese journal of digestive diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1046/J.1443-9573.2000.00011.X","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的:探讨经肝动脉灌注热化疗药物治疗肝癌的有效性和安全性。方法:对35例肝癌患者进行经肝动脉热化疗。将脂醇、5-Fu和碳铂加热至60-65℃后注入肝动脉。9例患者接受两种及以上治疗,并与同期接受普通介入治疗的14例患者进行疗效比较。4例患者在2-3个月后切除肿瘤,并将病理结果与其他4例接受常规治疗的患者进行比较。结果:热化疗组肿瘤生长率为-10±33.3%,对照组为36.4±59.0%,差异有统计学意义。切除标本轴向切片的肿瘤坏死率分别为93.5%±5.97%和73.5%±28.3%,差异无统计学意义。镜下两组病理变化相似。两组均有1例动脉损伤。对比热化疗组(19例)与对照组(22例),均采用“三明治”治疗,我们发现轻中度不良反应发生率分别为72.7%和63.6%,严重不良反应发生率分别为26.3%和37.4%。然而,这些差异没有统计学意义。结论:经肝动脉灌注热脂醇和化疗药物(60-65℃)联合明胶泡沫栓塞肝动脉是一种简单、安全的治疗肝癌的方法。可显著提高单纯经动脉介入治疗的有效性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical application of transarterial thermochemotherapy in hepatic cancer
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effectiveness and safety of transhepatic arterial infusion with warm chemotherapeutic agents in treating hepatic cancer. METHODS: Thirty-five cases of hepatic cancer were treated with transhepatic arterial thermochemotherapy. Lipiodol, 5-Fu and carbonplatinum were warmed to 60–65°C before infusion into the hepatic arteries. Nine patients had two or more treatments and the effectiveness of this treatment was compared with that observed in 14 patients who received ordinary interventional treatment within the same period. Four patients had their tumors removed 2–3 months later and the pathological results were compared with those of four other patients who received regular treatment. RESULTS: The tumor growth rate of the thermochemotherapy group was –10 ± 33.3%, while that of the control group was 36.4 ± 59.0%, a statistically significant difference. The tumor necrosis rates on the axial sections of the resected samples were 93.5%± 5.97% and 73.5%± 28.3%, respectively, but the difference was not statistically significant. Microscopically, the pathological changes in the two groups were similar. Only one patient in each group had arterial injury. Comparing the thermochemotherapy group (19 cases) with the control group (22 cases), all of whom received ‘sandwich’ therapy, we found that the prevalence of mild–moderate adverse effects was 72.7 and 63.6%, respectively, while that of severe adverse effects was 26.3 and 37.4%, respectively. However, these differences were of no statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: Transhepatic arterial perfusion of warmed Lipiodol and chemotherapeutic agents (60–65°C) combined with hepatic arterial embolization with gelfoam is a simple and safe method for treating hepatic cancer. It can markedly enhance the effectiveness of simple transarterial interventional therapy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Prospective randomized clinical trial of two drug delivery pathway in the treatment of inoperable advanced pancreatic carcinoma. Meta-analysis of inoperable pancreatic cancer: gemcitabine combined with cisplatin versus gemcitabine alone. Prevalence and risk factors of Helicobacter pylori infection in healthy schoolchildren. Association of peptic ulcer with increased expression of Lewis antigens, but not vacuolating cytotoxin activity or babA2 gene status, in Helicobacter pylori strains from China. Accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound staging of gastric cancer in routine clinical practice in Singapore.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1