美国农场池塘

S. Mcmurry
{"title":"美国农场池塘","authors":"S. Mcmurry","doi":"10.5749/buildland.27.2.0039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"abstract:During the twentieth century at least 2.5 million ponds were built on farms and ranches throughout the United States. This essay reviews how and why farm ponds were constructed and discusses their significance. Farm-pond building efforts were first developed in the early twentieth century in the Great Plains states. With the New Deal came the Soil Conservation Service with its innovative decentralized structure of local districts. Pond building took off throughout the United States, aided by funding, expertise, and soon by the availability of inexpensive earth-moving equipment. Stated purposes for ponds were consistent over time and included water for livestock, irrigation, soil conservation, wildlife habitat, fish production, ornamental value, and recreation: fishing, hunting, swimming, ice skating, and boating. Fire protection and spray water were added in the postwar period. Over time, bottom-up pressure helped push officials to more openly embrace farm pond recreation as a valid purpose for conserving the farm’s “human resources.”From an environmental history perspective, the farm pond and its associated features can be regarded as a “hybrid” landscape, manipulated by humans but also transformed by nonhuman nature. Its primary historical importance, however, lies in its role in promoting the much broader reworking of agricultural landscapes fostered by the so-called “conservation-industrial complex.”","PeriodicalId":41826,"journal":{"name":"Buildings & Landscapes-Journal of the Vernacular Architecture Forum","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The American Farm Pond\",\"authors\":\"S. Mcmurry\",\"doi\":\"10.5749/buildland.27.2.0039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"abstract:During the twentieth century at least 2.5 million ponds were built on farms and ranches throughout the United States. This essay reviews how and why farm ponds were constructed and discusses their significance. Farm-pond building efforts were first developed in the early twentieth century in the Great Plains states. With the New Deal came the Soil Conservation Service with its innovative decentralized structure of local districts. Pond building took off throughout the United States, aided by funding, expertise, and soon by the availability of inexpensive earth-moving equipment. Stated purposes for ponds were consistent over time and included water for livestock, irrigation, soil conservation, wildlife habitat, fish production, ornamental value, and recreation: fishing, hunting, swimming, ice skating, and boating. Fire protection and spray water were added in the postwar period. Over time, bottom-up pressure helped push officials to more openly embrace farm pond recreation as a valid purpose for conserving the farm’s “human resources.”From an environmental history perspective, the farm pond and its associated features can be regarded as a “hybrid” landscape, manipulated by humans but also transformed by nonhuman nature. Its primary historical importance, however, lies in its role in promoting the much broader reworking of agricultural landscapes fostered by the so-called “conservation-industrial complex.”\",\"PeriodicalId\":41826,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Buildings & Landscapes-Journal of the Vernacular Architecture Forum\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Buildings & Landscapes-Journal of the Vernacular Architecture Forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5749/buildland.27.2.0039\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ARCHITECTURE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Buildings & Landscapes-Journal of the Vernacular Architecture Forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5749/buildland.27.2.0039","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHITECTURE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在二十世纪,在美国各地的农场和牧场上至少建造了250万个池塘。本文回顾了农场池塘是如何以及为什么建造的,并讨论了它们的意义。建造农场池塘的努力最早是在20世纪初的大平原各州发展起来的。随着新政而来的是土壤保持局,其创新的地方地区分散结构。在资金和专业知识的帮助下,池塘建设在美国各地开始兴起,很快又有了廉价的挖土设备。随着时间的推移,池塘的用途是一致的,包括牲畜、灌溉、土壤保护、野生动物栖息地、鱼类生产、观赏价值和娱乐:钓鱼、狩猎、游泳、滑冰和划船。在战后增加了消防和喷水装置。随着时间的推移,自下而上的压力促使官员们更公开地接受农场池塘娱乐,作为保护农场“人力资源”的有效目的。从环境历史的角度来看,农场池塘及其相关特征可以被视为一种“混合”景观,由人类操纵,但也被非人类的自然所改造。然而,它的主要历史重要性在于,它在推动所谓的“保护工业综合体”所促进的更广泛的农业景观改造方面发挥了作用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The American Farm Pond
abstract:During the twentieth century at least 2.5 million ponds were built on farms and ranches throughout the United States. This essay reviews how and why farm ponds were constructed and discusses their significance. Farm-pond building efforts were first developed in the early twentieth century in the Great Plains states. With the New Deal came the Soil Conservation Service with its innovative decentralized structure of local districts. Pond building took off throughout the United States, aided by funding, expertise, and soon by the availability of inexpensive earth-moving equipment. Stated purposes for ponds were consistent over time and included water for livestock, irrigation, soil conservation, wildlife habitat, fish production, ornamental value, and recreation: fishing, hunting, swimming, ice skating, and boating. Fire protection and spray water were added in the postwar period. Over time, bottom-up pressure helped push officials to more openly embrace farm pond recreation as a valid purpose for conserving the farm’s “human resources.”From an environmental history perspective, the farm pond and its associated features can be regarded as a “hybrid” landscape, manipulated by humans but also transformed by nonhuman nature. Its primary historical importance, however, lies in its role in promoting the much broader reworking of agricultural landscapes fostered by the so-called “conservation-industrial complex.”
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊介绍: Buildings & Landscapes is the leading source for scholarly work on vernacular architecture of North America and beyond. The journal continues VAF’s tradition of scholarly publication going back to the first Perspectives in Vernacular Architecture in 1982. Published through the University of Minnesota Press since 2007, the journal moved from one to two issues per year in 2009. Buildings & Landscapes examines the places that people build and experience every day: houses and cities, farmsteads and alleys, churches and courthouses, subdivisions and shopping malls. The journal’s contributorsundefinedhistorians and architectural historians, preservationists and architects, geographers, anthropologists and folklorists, and others whose work involves documenting, analyzing, and interpreting vernacular formsundefinedapproach the built environment as a windows into human life and culture, basing their scholarship on both fieldwork and archival research. The editors encourage submission of articles that explore the ways the built environment shapes everyday life within and beyond North America.
期刊最新文献
A Detroit Story: Urban Decline and the Rise of Property Informality by Claire W. Herbert (review) Building Antebellum New Orleans: Free People of Color and Their Influence by Tara A. Dudley (review) “The Strange Artistic Genius of This People”: The Ephemeral Art and Impermanent Architecture of Italian Immigrant Catholic Feste Hiring Out: Enslaved Black Building Artisans in North Carolina Dreaming the Present: Time, Aesthetics, and the Black Cooperative Movement by Irvin J. Hunt, and: Freedom Farmers: Agricultural Resistance and the Black Freedom Movement by Monica M. White (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1