健壮的分析攻击:攻击者应该信任数据集吗?

Liran Lerman, Zdenek Martinasek, O. Markowitch
{"title":"健壮的分析攻击:攻击者应该信任数据集吗?","authors":"Liran Lerman, Zdenek Martinasek, O. Markowitch","doi":"10.1049/iet-ifs.2015.0574","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Side-channel attacks provide tools to analyse the degree of resilience of a cryptographic device against adversaries measuring leakages (e.g. power traces) on the target device executing cryptographic algorithms. In 2002, Chari et al. introduced template attacks (TA) as the strongest parametric profiled attacks in an information theoretic sense. Few years later, Schindler et al. proposed stochastic attacks (representing other parametric profiled attacks) as improved attacks (with respect to TA) when the adversary has information on the data-dependent part of the leakage. Less than ten years later, the machine learning field provided non-parametric profiled attacks especially useful in high dimensionality contexts. In this study, the authors provide new contexts in which profiled attacks based on machine learning outperform conventional parametric profiled attacks: when the set of leakages contains errors or distortions. More precisely, the authors found that (i) profiled attacks based on machine learning remain effective in a wide range of scenarios, and (ii) TA are more sensitive to distortions and errors in the profiling and attacking sets.","PeriodicalId":13305,"journal":{"name":"IET Inf. Secur.","volume":"37 1","pages":"188-194"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Robust profiled attacks: should the adversary trust the dataset?\",\"authors\":\"Liran Lerman, Zdenek Martinasek, O. Markowitch\",\"doi\":\"10.1049/iet-ifs.2015.0574\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Side-channel attacks provide tools to analyse the degree of resilience of a cryptographic device against adversaries measuring leakages (e.g. power traces) on the target device executing cryptographic algorithms. In 2002, Chari et al. introduced template attacks (TA) as the strongest parametric profiled attacks in an information theoretic sense. Few years later, Schindler et al. proposed stochastic attacks (representing other parametric profiled attacks) as improved attacks (with respect to TA) when the adversary has information on the data-dependent part of the leakage. Less than ten years later, the machine learning field provided non-parametric profiled attacks especially useful in high dimensionality contexts. In this study, the authors provide new contexts in which profiled attacks based on machine learning outperform conventional parametric profiled attacks: when the set of leakages contains errors or distortions. More precisely, the authors found that (i) profiled attacks based on machine learning remain effective in a wide range of scenarios, and (ii) TA are more sensitive to distortions and errors in the profiling and attacking sets.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13305,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"IET Inf. Secur.\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"188-194\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"IET Inf. Secur.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-ifs.2015.0574\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"IET Inf. Secur.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-ifs.2015.0574","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 10

摘要

侧信道攻击提供了工具来分析加密设备的弹性程度,以对抗对手测量执行加密算法的目标设备上的泄漏(例如电源跟踪)。2002年,Chari等人介绍了模板攻击(TA)作为信息论意义上最强的参数分析攻击。几年后,Schindler等人提出了随机攻击(代表其他参数分析攻击)作为改进的攻击(相对于TA),当攻击者拥有泄漏的数据依赖部分的信息时。不到十年后,机器学习领域提供了在高维环境中特别有用的非参数分析攻击。在这项研究中,作者提供了新的背景,其中基于机器学习的分析攻击优于传统的参数分析攻击:当泄漏集包含错误或扭曲时。更准确地说,作者发现(i)基于机器学习的分析攻击在广泛的场景中仍然有效,(ii) TA对分析和攻击集中的扭曲和错误更敏感。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Robust profiled attacks: should the adversary trust the dataset?
Side-channel attacks provide tools to analyse the degree of resilience of a cryptographic device against adversaries measuring leakages (e.g. power traces) on the target device executing cryptographic algorithms. In 2002, Chari et al. introduced template attacks (TA) as the strongest parametric profiled attacks in an information theoretic sense. Few years later, Schindler et al. proposed stochastic attacks (representing other parametric profiled attacks) as improved attacks (with respect to TA) when the adversary has information on the data-dependent part of the leakage. Less than ten years later, the machine learning field provided non-parametric profiled attacks especially useful in high dimensionality contexts. In this study, the authors provide new contexts in which profiled attacks based on machine learning outperform conventional parametric profiled attacks: when the set of leakages contains errors or distortions. More precisely, the authors found that (i) profiled attacks based on machine learning remain effective in a wide range of scenarios, and (ii) TA are more sensitive to distortions and errors in the profiling and attacking sets.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Revisit Two Memoryless State-Recovery Cryptanalysis Methods on A5/1 Improved Lattice-Based Mix-Nets for Electronic Voting Adaptive and survivable trust management for Internet of Things systems Comment on 'Targeted Ciphers for Format-Preserving Encryption' from Selected Areas in Cryptography 2018 Time-specific encrypted range query with minimum leakage disclosure
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1