能源和碳市场相互依赖程度如何?来自分位数对分位数回归方法的证据

Kun Duan, Xiaohang Ren, Yukun Shi, T. Mishra, Cheng Yan
{"title":"能源和碳市场相互依赖程度如何?来自分位数对分位数回归方法的证据","authors":"Kun Duan, Xiaohang Ren, Yukun Shi, T. Mishra, Cheng Yan","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3440173","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We premise and model the dynamic interdependence between energy and carbon prices in Phase III of the European Union Emission Trading Scheme (EU ETS) in a heterogeneous impulse-response setting. Our research framework is based on the proposition that energy prices (e.g., oil, natural gas, and coal) would impact carbon prices negatively, but the impact magnitudes would be varied over the distribution of carbon and energy prices, having thus important policy implications. Applying a novel Quantile-on-Quantile (QQ) regression and the causality-in-quantiles approach, we show that the negative impacts are much stronger when carbon prices are at lower quantiles of the price distribution compared with that at the higher quantiles. In the face of different nature in energy price shocks, the asymmetric carbon price-response is an indication of the non-unique carbon market dynamics, the efficient management of which would require differentiated policy interventions. Robustness checks reassure the accuracy of our conclusions.","PeriodicalId":100779,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Energy Finance & Development","volume":"37 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How Interdependent are Energy and Carbon Markets? Evidence from a Quantile-on-Quantile Regression Approach\",\"authors\":\"Kun Duan, Xiaohang Ren, Yukun Shi, T. Mishra, Cheng Yan\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3440173\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We premise and model the dynamic interdependence between energy and carbon prices in Phase III of the European Union Emission Trading Scheme (EU ETS) in a heterogeneous impulse-response setting. Our research framework is based on the proposition that energy prices (e.g., oil, natural gas, and coal) would impact carbon prices negatively, but the impact magnitudes would be varied over the distribution of carbon and energy prices, having thus important policy implications. Applying a novel Quantile-on-Quantile (QQ) regression and the causality-in-quantiles approach, we show that the negative impacts are much stronger when carbon prices are at lower quantiles of the price distribution compared with that at the higher quantiles. In the face of different nature in energy price shocks, the asymmetric carbon price-response is an indication of the non-unique carbon market dynamics, the efficient management of which would require differentiated policy interventions. Robustness checks reassure the accuracy of our conclusions.\",\"PeriodicalId\":100779,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Energy Finance & Development\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Energy Finance & Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3440173\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Energy Finance & Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3440173","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

我们假设并模拟了欧盟排放交易计划(EU ETS)第三阶段能源和碳价格之间在异质脉冲响应环境下的动态相互依赖性。我们的研究框架是基于这样一个命题:能源价格(如石油、天然气和煤炭)会对碳价格产生负面影响,但影响程度会随着碳和能源价格的分布而变化,因此具有重要的政策含义。采用一种新颖的分位数对分位数(QQ)回归和分位数内因果关系方法,我们发现当碳价格处于价格分布的较低分位数时,其负面影响要比处于较高分位数时强得多。面对不同性质的能源价格冲击,碳价格反应的不对称表明了碳市场动态的非独特性,其有效管理需要差异化的政策干预。稳健性检验保证了我们结论的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How Interdependent are Energy and Carbon Markets? Evidence from a Quantile-on-Quantile Regression Approach
We premise and model the dynamic interdependence between energy and carbon prices in Phase III of the European Union Emission Trading Scheme (EU ETS) in a heterogeneous impulse-response setting. Our research framework is based on the proposition that energy prices (e.g., oil, natural gas, and coal) would impact carbon prices negatively, but the impact magnitudes would be varied over the distribution of carbon and energy prices, having thus important policy implications. Applying a novel Quantile-on-Quantile (QQ) regression and the causality-in-quantiles approach, we show that the negative impacts are much stronger when carbon prices are at lower quantiles of the price distribution compared with that at the higher quantiles. In the face of different nature in energy price shocks, the asymmetric carbon price-response is an indication of the non-unique carbon market dynamics, the efficient management of which would require differentiated policy interventions. Robustness checks reassure the accuracy of our conclusions.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Minimization of Energy Efficiency Barriers in the Context of Optimization of Management Decisions in the Process of Sustainable Development Household heterogeneity in valuation of heating energy costs ROLE OF BIG DATA IN FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS FOR FINANCIAL FRAUD Porous CoP@RGO With Pseudocapacitance Characteristics for Lithium Ion Storage Factors Affecting Renters’ Electricity Use: More than Split Incentives
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1