{"title":"二十一世纪的神学——超越巴斯?","authors":"C. Lombard","doi":"10.5952/54-0-357","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Dirkie Smit is honoured in this contribution as a theologian\n who has persistently and ingeniously held together two poles in Reformed theology:\n Karl Barth’s emphasis on Christology: God’s salvation and free grace as incarnated\n in Christ, and Van Ruler’s emphasis on pneumatology: the appropriation, application\n and working out of God’s grace in humanity, nature and history, through the\n indwelling power of God’s Spirit. The article, based on cryptic notes in which Van\n Ruler offered “Critical comments on Barth’s theology” (1965), provides an English\n translation of this unique text with explanatory footnotes. It is suggested that Van\n Ruler’s sixteen pertinent questions to Barth, almost fifty years ago, once again\n deserve our careful attention and that our task remains to keep in balance the work\n of the Creator, the Saviour and the Spirit, which persists in working on the\n pneumatological question of how we as human beings are incorporated into God’s\n ongoing, sanctifying work in nature and history.","PeriodicalId":18902,"journal":{"name":"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2013-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Theology for the twenty-first century - going beyond Barth?\",\"authors\":\"C. Lombard\",\"doi\":\"10.5952/54-0-357\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Dirkie Smit is honoured in this contribution as a theologian\\n who has persistently and ingeniously held together two poles in Reformed theology:\\n Karl Barth’s emphasis on Christology: God’s salvation and free grace as incarnated\\n in Christ, and Van Ruler’s emphasis on pneumatology: the appropriation, application\\n and working out of God’s grace in humanity, nature and history, through the\\n indwelling power of God’s Spirit. The article, based on cryptic notes in which Van\\n Ruler offered “Critical comments on Barth’s theology” (1965), provides an English\\n translation of this unique text with explanatory footnotes. It is suggested that Van\\n Ruler’s sixteen pertinent questions to Barth, almost fifty years ago, once again\\n deserve our careful attention and that our task remains to keep in balance the work\\n of the Creator, the Saviour and the Spirit, which persists in working on the\\n pneumatological question of how we as human beings are incorporated into God’s\\n ongoing, sanctifying work in nature and history.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18902,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2013-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5952/54-0-357\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Nederduitse Gereformeerde Teologiese Tydskrif","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5952/54-0-357","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Theology for the twenty-first century - going beyond Barth?
Dirkie Smit is honoured in this contribution as a theologian
who has persistently and ingeniously held together two poles in Reformed theology:
Karl Barth’s emphasis on Christology: God’s salvation and free grace as incarnated
in Christ, and Van Ruler’s emphasis on pneumatology: the appropriation, application
and working out of God’s grace in humanity, nature and history, through the
indwelling power of God’s Spirit. The article, based on cryptic notes in which Van
Ruler offered “Critical comments on Barth’s theology” (1965), provides an English
translation of this unique text with explanatory footnotes. It is suggested that Van
Ruler’s sixteen pertinent questions to Barth, almost fifty years ago, once again
deserve our careful attention and that our task remains to keep in balance the work
of the Creator, the Saviour and the Spirit, which persists in working on the
pneumatological question of how we as human beings are incorporated into God’s
ongoing, sanctifying work in nature and history.