公司在Covid-19时期的作用

David O. Dowling
{"title":"公司在Covid-19时期的作用","authors":"David O. Dowling","doi":"10.1080/09615768.2021.1888446","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Covid-19 virus and the resulting pandemic have caused tragic loss of life and suffering. As countries have tried to lower the infection rate they have been forced to shut down large swathes of their economies. The necessary but self-imposed hardship has impacted everyone in society, albeit not equally. Much of the commentary on Covid19 has focused on how the pandemic has accelerated existing underlying trends. This article will argue that a similar process is taking place in relation to attitudes towards the company and its role in society, focusing on the UK. These changes are not necessarily part of a single, consistent set of policy decisions. Instead, they reflect broader, preexisting changes in society and our assumptions about the interaction between profit and purpose. The actions taken by the Government are based (whether consciously or not) on the principle that companies are not purely private assets but instead agents for positive change. Informed by this growing view, the Government has (in some respects) enlisted private assets to deliver its broader societal outcomes. One can place these actions within the pre-existing trend towards a more enlightened shareholder value approach to the company, with a belief that companies should also operate for the benefit of broader stakeholders rather than just shareholders. However, the recent changes have still not fully ushered in enlightened shareholder value. Instead the Government has continued its prior tendency of relying on a system of disclosure-based regulation in the context of corporate governance, which does not always adequately deliver positive social outcomes.","PeriodicalId":88025,"journal":{"name":"King's law journal : KLJ","volume":"79 12 1","pages":"37 - 48"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Role of the Company in the Time of Covid-19\",\"authors\":\"David O. Dowling\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/09615768.2021.1888446\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Covid-19 virus and the resulting pandemic have caused tragic loss of life and suffering. As countries have tried to lower the infection rate they have been forced to shut down large swathes of their economies. The necessary but self-imposed hardship has impacted everyone in society, albeit not equally. Much of the commentary on Covid19 has focused on how the pandemic has accelerated existing underlying trends. This article will argue that a similar process is taking place in relation to attitudes towards the company and its role in society, focusing on the UK. These changes are not necessarily part of a single, consistent set of policy decisions. Instead, they reflect broader, preexisting changes in society and our assumptions about the interaction between profit and purpose. The actions taken by the Government are based (whether consciously or not) on the principle that companies are not purely private assets but instead agents for positive change. Informed by this growing view, the Government has (in some respects) enlisted private assets to deliver its broader societal outcomes. One can place these actions within the pre-existing trend towards a more enlightened shareholder value approach to the company, with a belief that companies should also operate for the benefit of broader stakeholders rather than just shareholders. However, the recent changes have still not fully ushered in enlightened shareholder value. Instead the Government has continued its prior tendency of relying on a system of disclosure-based regulation in the context of corporate governance, which does not always adequately deliver positive social outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":88025,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"King's law journal : KLJ\",\"volume\":\"79 12 1\",\"pages\":\"37 - 48\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-01-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"King's law journal : KLJ\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2021.1888446\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"King's law journal : KLJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/09615768.2021.1888446","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

Covid-19病毒及其引发的大流行造成了悲惨的生命损失和痛苦。随着各国试图降低感染率,他们被迫关闭了大片经济。必要但自我强加的困难影响了社会上的每个人,尽管不是平等的。关于covid - 19的许多评论都侧重于大流行如何加速了现有的基本趋势。这篇文章将争辩说,一个类似的过程正在发生在对公司的态度及其在社会中的作用,重点放在英国。这些变化不一定是单一的、一致的政策决定的一部分。相反,它们反映了社会中更广泛的、预先存在的变化,以及我们对利润和目的之间相互作用的假设。政府采取的行动是基于(无论是否有意识)这样一个原则,即公司不是纯粹的私人资产,而是积极变革的推动者。鉴于这种日益增长的观点,政府(在某些方面)利用私人资产来实现其更广泛的社会成果。人们可以将这些行动置于一种已有的趋势之中,即对公司采取更开明的股东价值方法,相信公司也应该为更广泛的利益相关者而不仅仅是股东的利益而运营。然而,最近的变化仍未完全带来开明的股东价值。相反,政府继续其先前的倾向,即在公司治理的背景下依赖一种基于披露的监管制度,这种制度并不总是充分产生积极的社会结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Role of the Company in the Time of Covid-19
The Covid-19 virus and the resulting pandemic have caused tragic loss of life and suffering. As countries have tried to lower the infection rate they have been forced to shut down large swathes of their economies. The necessary but self-imposed hardship has impacted everyone in society, albeit not equally. Much of the commentary on Covid19 has focused on how the pandemic has accelerated existing underlying trends. This article will argue that a similar process is taking place in relation to attitudes towards the company and its role in society, focusing on the UK. These changes are not necessarily part of a single, consistent set of policy decisions. Instead, they reflect broader, preexisting changes in society and our assumptions about the interaction between profit and purpose. The actions taken by the Government are based (whether consciously or not) on the principle that companies are not purely private assets but instead agents for positive change. Informed by this growing view, the Government has (in some respects) enlisted private assets to deliver its broader societal outcomes. One can place these actions within the pre-existing trend towards a more enlightened shareholder value approach to the company, with a belief that companies should also operate for the benefit of broader stakeholders rather than just shareholders. However, the recent changes have still not fully ushered in enlightened shareholder value. Instead the Government has continued its prior tendency of relying on a system of disclosure-based regulation in the context of corporate governance, which does not always adequately deliver positive social outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Unity in diversity? Constitutional identities, deliberative processes and a ‘Border Poll’ in Ireland The Nation vs. the People. The unconstitutionality of secessionist referendums under Belgian constitutional law The impact of federalism on secession referendums: comparing Scotland and Québec Assessing the Legitimacy of Referendums as a Vehicle for Constitutional Amendment: Reform and Abolition of the Legislative Councils in Queensland and New South Wales Referendums and representation in democratic constitution making: Lessons from the failed Chilean constitutional experiment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1