COVID-19大流行期间英国的心理健康和心理困扰:跨时间的比较

IF 1.4 Q3 PSYCHIATRY Advances in Mental Health Pub Date : 2021-05-27 DOI:10.1080/18387357.2022.2039072
James Knowles, Nicola S. Gray, A. John, Christopher O’Connor, J. Pink, Nicola J. Simkiss, R. Snowden
{"title":"COVID-19大流行期间英国的心理健康和心理困扰:跨时间的比较","authors":"James Knowles, Nicola S. Gray, A. John, Christopher O’Connor, J. Pink, Nicola J. Simkiss, R. Snowden","doi":"10.1080/18387357.2022.2039072","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Objective This study aimed to assess the trajectory of wellbeing and psychological distress in a UK sample by comparing data taken from the first and second UK lockdowns. Method Wellbeing (indexed via the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale) and psychological distress (indexed via the K10) were measured in two surveys in large online samples from Wales, UK. The first survey (n = 12,989) took place 11–16 weeks into the first UK lockdown and the second survey (n = 10,428) took place 4–11 weeks into the second UK lockdown. Results Levels of wellbeing were lower in the second survey compared to the first survey, which were already low compared to pre-pandemic data (2019). Clinically significant levels of psychological distress were found in 40.4% of participants in the second survey, representing a 9.8% increase in prevalence from the first survey. Poorer mental health was found in women, younger adults, and those from deprived areas. The greatest reduction in mental health was found in the youngest age group (16-24 years old). Discussion The COVID-19 pandemic and the measures taken to curb its spread continue to negatively impact the wellbeing of the UK population.","PeriodicalId":51720,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Mental Health","volume":"80 5 1","pages":"30 - 42"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Mental wellbeing and psychological distress in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: a comparison across time\",\"authors\":\"James Knowles, Nicola S. Gray, A. John, Christopher O’Connor, J. Pink, Nicola J. Simkiss, R. Snowden\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/18387357.2022.2039072\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Objective This study aimed to assess the trajectory of wellbeing and psychological distress in a UK sample by comparing data taken from the first and second UK lockdowns. Method Wellbeing (indexed via the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale) and psychological distress (indexed via the K10) were measured in two surveys in large online samples from Wales, UK. The first survey (n = 12,989) took place 11–16 weeks into the first UK lockdown and the second survey (n = 10,428) took place 4–11 weeks into the second UK lockdown. Results Levels of wellbeing were lower in the second survey compared to the first survey, which were already low compared to pre-pandemic data (2019). Clinically significant levels of psychological distress were found in 40.4% of participants in the second survey, representing a 9.8% increase in prevalence from the first survey. Poorer mental health was found in women, younger adults, and those from deprived areas. The greatest reduction in mental health was found in the youngest age group (16-24 years old). Discussion The COVID-19 pandemic and the measures taken to curb its spread continue to negatively impact the wellbeing of the UK population.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51720,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Mental Health\",\"volume\":\"80 5 1\",\"pages\":\"30 - 42\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Mental Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/18387357.2022.2039072\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Mental Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/18387357.2022.2039072","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

摘要目的本研究旨在通过比较英国第一次和第二次封锁期间的数据,评估英国样本的幸福感和心理困扰的轨迹。方法对来自英国威尔士的大型在线样本进行两项调查,测量幸福感(通过沃里克-爱丁堡心理健康量表索引)和心理困扰(通过K10索引)。第一次调查(n = 12,989)在英国第一次封锁后11-16周进行,第二次调查(n = 10,428)在英国第二次封锁后4-11周进行。与第一次调查相比,第二次调查的幸福感水平较低,而与大流行前(2019年)的数据相比,第二次调查的幸福感水平已经很低。在第二次调查中,40.4%的参与者存在临床显著程度的心理困扰,比第一次调查的患病率增加了9.8%。女性、年轻人和贫困地区的人心理健康状况较差。最年轻年龄组(16-24岁)的心理健康状况下降幅度最大。2019冠状病毒病大流行以及为遏制其传播所采取的措施继续对英国人民的福祉产生负面影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Mental wellbeing and psychological distress in the UK during the COVID-19 pandemic: a comparison across time
ABSTRACT Objective This study aimed to assess the trajectory of wellbeing and psychological distress in a UK sample by comparing data taken from the first and second UK lockdowns. Method Wellbeing (indexed via the Warwick-Edinburgh Mental Wellbeing Scale) and psychological distress (indexed via the K10) were measured in two surveys in large online samples from Wales, UK. The first survey (n = 12,989) took place 11–16 weeks into the first UK lockdown and the second survey (n = 10,428) took place 4–11 weeks into the second UK lockdown. Results Levels of wellbeing were lower in the second survey compared to the first survey, which were already low compared to pre-pandemic data (2019). Clinically significant levels of psychological distress were found in 40.4% of participants in the second survey, representing a 9.8% increase in prevalence from the first survey. Poorer mental health was found in women, younger adults, and those from deprived areas. The greatest reduction in mental health was found in the youngest age group (16-24 years old). Discussion The COVID-19 pandemic and the measures taken to curb its spread continue to negatively impact the wellbeing of the UK population.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.20
自引率
7.10%
发文量
19
期刊最新文献
Patients’ and staff’s experiences of Well-Track physical activity and sleep quality intervention in an Early Intervention in Psychosis (EIP) service Assessment of the implementation of psychological first aid training: adaptation and validation of determinants of the implementation behavior questionnaire Investigating factors that impact on the uptake of Mental Health First Aid Australia’s Conversations About Gambling course: a qualitative study engaging stakeholder perspectives The relationship between mental health and stress: the moderating role of satisfaction with friendships Mental Health First Aid training for China: protocol for a randomised controlled trial
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1