创造了生病的?好吧,不完全是这样……加拿大无神论者报告的损伤和残疾程度与宗教信徒相似

Q2 Arts and Humanities Journal of Disability and Religion Pub Date : 2022-10-12 DOI:10.1080/23312521.2022.2130500
David Speed, Allyson Lamont, Jo E. C. MacDonald, K. Hwang
{"title":"创造了生病的?好吧,不完全是这样……加拿大无神论者报告的损伤和残疾程度与宗教信徒相似","authors":"David Speed, Allyson Lamont, Jo E. C. MacDonald, K. Hwang","doi":"10.1080/23312521.2022.2130500","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Religion/spirituality (R/S) is positively associated with a variety of health outcomes, although how R/S relates to the likelihood or severity of impairment or disability is understudied. Given the broad salutary effects of R/S, we tested if nonreligious groups (specifically atheists) were more likely to report impairment or were more likely to report greater disability. Using Canadian data (N ≥ 1,000) from the 2015 General Social Survey (Cycle 29), we compared atheists to Agnostics, Nones, Protestants, Catholics, Christian Orthodox, and Eastern Religion practitioners. The results indicated that Atheists were slightly more likely to report the presence of impairment and disability relative to Catholics, but these effects were in the trivial-to-small range. When exploring the severity of self-reported disability across religious groups, atheists did not differ from any other religious group. These results are intriguing as the broader R/S-health literature has suggested that greater secularism should be associated with a health penalty; however, we found limited evidence to support this. Although we cannot state that atheism is necessarily healthy, the results of the current study would suggest that atheism is certainly not unhealthy.","PeriodicalId":38120,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Disability and Religion","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Created Sick? Well, Not Exactly… Canadian Atheists Report Similar Levels of Impairment and Disability to the Religiously Affiliated\",\"authors\":\"David Speed, Allyson Lamont, Jo E. C. MacDonald, K. Hwang\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23312521.2022.2130500\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Religion/spirituality (R/S) is positively associated with a variety of health outcomes, although how R/S relates to the likelihood or severity of impairment or disability is understudied. Given the broad salutary effects of R/S, we tested if nonreligious groups (specifically atheists) were more likely to report impairment or were more likely to report greater disability. Using Canadian data (N ≥ 1,000) from the 2015 General Social Survey (Cycle 29), we compared atheists to Agnostics, Nones, Protestants, Catholics, Christian Orthodox, and Eastern Religion practitioners. The results indicated that Atheists were slightly more likely to report the presence of impairment and disability relative to Catholics, but these effects were in the trivial-to-small range. When exploring the severity of self-reported disability across religious groups, atheists did not differ from any other religious group. These results are intriguing as the broader R/S-health literature has suggested that greater secularism should be associated with a health penalty; however, we found limited evidence to support this. Although we cannot state that atheism is necessarily healthy, the results of the current study would suggest that atheism is certainly not unhealthy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":38120,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Disability and Religion\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Disability and Religion\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23312521.2022.2130500\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Disability and Religion","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23312521.2022.2130500","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

宗教/灵性(R/S)与多种健康结果呈正相关,尽管R/S与损伤或残疾的可能性或严重程度之间的关系尚未得到充分研究。考虑到R/S的广泛有益影响,我们测试了非宗教群体(特别是无神论者)是否更有可能报告损伤或更有可能报告更严重的残疾。使用加拿大2015年综合社会调查(第29周期)的数据(N≥1000),我们将无神论者与不可知论者、无信仰者、新教徒、天主教徒、东正教和东方宗教从业者进行了比较。结果表明,相对于天主教徒,无神论者更有可能报告存在缺陷和残疾,但这些影响在微不足道的范围内。当调查宗教团体中自我报告残疾的严重程度时,无神论者与其他任何宗教团体都没有区别。这些结果很有趣,因为更广泛的R/ s健康文献表明,更大的世俗主义应该与健康惩罚有关;然而,我们发现支持这一观点的证据有限。虽然我们不能说无神论一定是健康的,但目前的研究结果表明,无神论肯定不是不健康的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Created Sick? Well, Not Exactly… Canadian Atheists Report Similar Levels of Impairment and Disability to the Religiously Affiliated
Abstract Religion/spirituality (R/S) is positively associated with a variety of health outcomes, although how R/S relates to the likelihood or severity of impairment or disability is understudied. Given the broad salutary effects of R/S, we tested if nonreligious groups (specifically atheists) were more likely to report impairment or were more likely to report greater disability. Using Canadian data (N ≥ 1,000) from the 2015 General Social Survey (Cycle 29), we compared atheists to Agnostics, Nones, Protestants, Catholics, Christian Orthodox, and Eastern Religion practitioners. The results indicated that Atheists were slightly more likely to report the presence of impairment and disability relative to Catholics, but these effects were in the trivial-to-small range. When exploring the severity of self-reported disability across religious groups, atheists did not differ from any other religious group. These results are intriguing as the broader R/S-health literature has suggested that greater secularism should be associated with a health penalty; however, we found limited evidence to support this. Although we cannot state that atheism is necessarily healthy, the results of the current study would suggest that atheism is certainly not unhealthy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Disability and Religion
Journal of Disability and Religion Arts and Humanities-Religious Studies
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊最新文献
Theological Education with Neurodiversity in Mind: Research Insights and Future Possibilities A Spiritual Journey through Cancer and Beyond: Prayer, Pilgrimage, and Faith in Lisa Ray’s Close to the Bone On the Spectrum: Autism, Faith, & the Gifts of Neurodiversity On the Spectrum: Autism, Faith, & the Gifts of Neurodiversity . Daniel Bowman Jr. (Grand Rapids, MI: Brazos, 2021). 256 pp. Paperback. 19.99 USD. ISBN 978-1-5874-3506-5. Dismantling the Supercrip Prof: Theological Education and Faculty Accessibility Introduction: Centering Neurodiversity in Theological Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1