Dawn Y. Lam, H. Wagner, Aaron B. Zimmerman, B. Rosner, Beth T. Kinoshita, Chandra V Mickles, G. Mitchell, M. Moreno, K. Richdale
{"title":"针对性患者教育后软性隐形眼镜佩戴者风险评分和行为的变化","authors":"Dawn Y. Lam, H. Wagner, Aaron B. Zimmerman, B. Rosner, Beth T. Kinoshita, Chandra V Mickles, G. Mitchell, M. Moreno, K. Richdale","doi":"10.1097/ICL.0000000000000900","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Objectives: To determine if targeted education can influence the behaviors and scores of soft contact lens (SCL) wearers via the Contact Lens Risk Survey (CLRS). Methods: This was a multicenter, prospective, case–control study. Cases were symptomatic red eye SCL wearers (age, 18–39 years), and controls were age , sex, and site matched. Participants completed the CLRS and were provided targeted patient education at three time points: baseline, one, and six months. Change in scores and behaviors were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results: Forty-one cases and 71 controls were analyzed. The mean risk score (mean±SE) from baseline to follow-up improved (reduced) for all participants (−1.96±0.73; P=0.01), mostly driven by the improvement among cases (−2.55±1.32; P=0.05). Case subjects reported a decrease in frequency of wearing lenses while showering (−0.32±0.07; P<0.0001), discarding lens solution (−0.13±0.06; P=0.03), and rinsing lenses with tap water (−0.19±0.08; P=0.02) after targeted education. Conclusions: Targeted patient education can influence some behaviors of SCL wearers, especially those who experienced a red eye event. Further study is needed to determine how to improve other risk behaviors and whether these changes are sustained long term.","PeriodicalId":12216,"journal":{"name":"Eye & Contact Lens: Science & Clinical Practice","volume":"50 1","pages":"347 - 354"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Change in Risk Score and Behaviors of Soft Contact Lens Wearers After Targeted Patient Education\",\"authors\":\"Dawn Y. Lam, H. Wagner, Aaron B. Zimmerman, B. Rosner, Beth T. Kinoshita, Chandra V Mickles, G. Mitchell, M. Moreno, K. Richdale\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/ICL.0000000000000900\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Objectives: To determine if targeted education can influence the behaviors and scores of soft contact lens (SCL) wearers via the Contact Lens Risk Survey (CLRS). Methods: This was a multicenter, prospective, case–control study. Cases were symptomatic red eye SCL wearers (age, 18–39 years), and controls were age , sex, and site matched. Participants completed the CLRS and were provided targeted patient education at three time points: baseline, one, and six months. Change in scores and behaviors were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results: Forty-one cases and 71 controls were analyzed. The mean risk score (mean±SE) from baseline to follow-up improved (reduced) for all participants (−1.96±0.73; P=0.01), mostly driven by the improvement among cases (−2.55±1.32; P=0.05). Case subjects reported a decrease in frequency of wearing lenses while showering (−0.32±0.07; P<0.0001), discarding lens solution (−0.13±0.06; P=0.03), and rinsing lenses with tap water (−0.19±0.08; P=0.02) after targeted education. Conclusions: Targeted patient education can influence some behaviors of SCL wearers, especially those who experienced a red eye event. Further study is needed to determine how to improve other risk behaviors and whether these changes are sustained long term.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12216,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eye & Contact Lens: Science & Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"347 - 354\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eye & Contact Lens: Science & Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000000900\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eye & Contact Lens: Science & Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/ICL.0000000000000900","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Change in Risk Score and Behaviors of Soft Contact Lens Wearers After Targeted Patient Education
Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Objectives: To determine if targeted education can influence the behaviors and scores of soft contact lens (SCL) wearers via the Contact Lens Risk Survey (CLRS). Methods: This was a multicenter, prospective, case–control study. Cases were symptomatic red eye SCL wearers (age, 18–39 years), and controls were age , sex, and site matched. Participants completed the CLRS and were provided targeted patient education at three time points: baseline, one, and six months. Change in scores and behaviors were analyzed using the Wilcoxon signed rank test. Results: Forty-one cases and 71 controls were analyzed. The mean risk score (mean±SE) from baseline to follow-up improved (reduced) for all participants (−1.96±0.73; P=0.01), mostly driven by the improvement among cases (−2.55±1.32; P=0.05). Case subjects reported a decrease in frequency of wearing lenses while showering (−0.32±0.07; P<0.0001), discarding lens solution (−0.13±0.06; P=0.03), and rinsing lenses with tap water (−0.19±0.08; P=0.02) after targeted education. Conclusions: Targeted patient education can influence some behaviors of SCL wearers, especially those who experienced a red eye event. Further study is needed to determine how to improve other risk behaviors and whether these changes are sustained long term.