并发高阶命令式程序的模块化推理

L. Birkedal
{"title":"并发高阶命令式程序的模块化推理","authors":"L. Birkedal","doi":"10.1145/2535838.2537849","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Modern mainstream programming languages permit a powerful combination of language features: concurrency, higher-order functions, and mutable shared data structures. These features are all very important for programming in practice. However, it is wellknown that the combination of them makes it difficult to write correct and secure programs, and it is therefore important to develop mathematically-based techniques for formal reasoning about correctness and security of programs with these features. To get scalable methods that apply to realistic programs, it is crucial that the mathematical models and logics support modular reasoning, meaning that (1) specifications and proofs are compositional wrt. the program structure; and (2) specifications and proofs can concentrate on the resources that a program actually acts upon, instead of its entire state. In this talk I will give an overview of some of the central developments that my group has worked on when generalizing reasoning techniques for simpler programming languages to concurrent, higher-order, imperative languages. I will consider both relational models and program logics based on higher-order separation logic.","PeriodicalId":20683,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 41st ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages","volume":"20 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-01-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Modular reasoning about concurrent higher-order imperative programs\",\"authors\":\"L. Birkedal\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/2535838.2537849\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Modern mainstream programming languages permit a powerful combination of language features: concurrency, higher-order functions, and mutable shared data structures. These features are all very important for programming in practice. However, it is wellknown that the combination of them makes it difficult to write correct and secure programs, and it is therefore important to develop mathematically-based techniques for formal reasoning about correctness and security of programs with these features. To get scalable methods that apply to realistic programs, it is crucial that the mathematical models and logics support modular reasoning, meaning that (1) specifications and proofs are compositional wrt. the program structure; and (2) specifications and proofs can concentrate on the resources that a program actually acts upon, instead of its entire state. In this talk I will give an overview of some of the central developments that my group has worked on when generalizing reasoning techniques for simpler programming languages to concurrent, higher-order, imperative languages. I will consider both relational models and program logics based on higher-order separation logic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":20683,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 41st ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-01-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 41st ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/2535838.2537849\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 41st ACM SIGPLAN-SIGACT Symposium on Principles of Programming Languages","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/2535838.2537849","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

现代主流编程语言允许强大的语言特性组合:并发性、高阶函数和可变共享数据结构。这些特性在实际编程中都是非常重要的。然而,众所周知,它们的组合使得编写正确和安全的程序变得困难,因此,开发基于数学的技术来对具有这些特征的程序的正确性和安全性进行形式化推理是很重要的。为了获得适用于实际程序的可伸缩方法,数学模型和逻辑支持模块化推理至关重要,这意味着(1)规范和证明是组合的wrt。程序结构;(2)规范和证明可以集中于程序实际作用的资源,而不是它的整个状态。在这次演讲中,我将概述我的团队在将简单编程语言的推理技术推广到并发、高阶、命令式语言时所做的一些核心发展。我将考虑基于高阶分离逻辑的关系模型和程序逻辑。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Modular reasoning about concurrent higher-order imperative programs
Modern mainstream programming languages permit a powerful combination of language features: concurrency, higher-order functions, and mutable shared data structures. These features are all very important for programming in practice. However, it is wellknown that the combination of them makes it difficult to write correct and secure programs, and it is therefore important to develop mathematically-based techniques for formal reasoning about correctness and security of programs with these features. To get scalable methods that apply to realistic programs, it is crucial that the mathematical models and logics support modular reasoning, meaning that (1) specifications and proofs are compositional wrt. the program structure; and (2) specifications and proofs can concentrate on the resources that a program actually acts upon, instead of its entire state. In this talk I will give an overview of some of the central developments that my group has worked on when generalizing reasoning techniques for simpler programming languages to concurrent, higher-order, imperative languages. I will consider both relational models and program logics based on higher-order separation logic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Session details: Verified systems Session details: Semantic models 2 Session details: Program analysis 3 Session details: Program analysis 1 Session details: Type system design
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1