M. Pauporte, Melissa L. Goodhead, A. Azzaro, G. Moonsammy, H. Maibach
{"title":"斯来吉兰透皮系统(STS):皮肤安全性的临床前试验","authors":"M. Pauporte, Melissa L. Goodhead, A. Azzaro, G. Moonsammy, H. Maibach","doi":"10.1081/CUS-200035363","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Two preclinical sensitization studies were conducted to determine the potential for allergic contact dermatitis with the selegiline transdermal system (STS), a novel transdermal system being developed to treat major depressive disorder. These included a qualitative structure‐activity relationship (QSAR) analysis to assess the allergic dermatitis potential of selegiline, and a guinea pig dermal sensitization study to determine the delayed contact hypersensitivity potential of the STS. In the QSAR analysis, selegiline was classified as a nonallergen. In the guinea pig study, the STS was found not to act as a dermal sensitizer. Thus, based upon the results of these two preclinical studies, treatment with the STS is unlikely to pose a risk of causing significant allergic contact dermatitis. Human data, reported elsewhere, support this hypothesis.","PeriodicalId":17547,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Toxicology-cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology","volume":"106 1","pages":"173 - 178"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Selegiline Transdermal System (STS): Preclinical Assays of Dermal Safety\",\"authors\":\"M. Pauporte, Melissa L. Goodhead, A. Azzaro, G. Moonsammy, H. Maibach\",\"doi\":\"10.1081/CUS-200035363\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Two preclinical sensitization studies were conducted to determine the potential for allergic contact dermatitis with the selegiline transdermal system (STS), a novel transdermal system being developed to treat major depressive disorder. These included a qualitative structure‐activity relationship (QSAR) analysis to assess the allergic dermatitis potential of selegiline, and a guinea pig dermal sensitization study to determine the delayed contact hypersensitivity potential of the STS. In the QSAR analysis, selegiline was classified as a nonallergen. In the guinea pig study, the STS was found not to act as a dermal sensitizer. Thus, based upon the results of these two preclinical studies, treatment with the STS is unlikely to pose a risk of causing significant allergic contact dermatitis. Human data, reported elsewhere, support this hypothesis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":17547,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Toxicology-cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology\",\"volume\":\"106 1\",\"pages\":\"173 - 178\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Toxicology-cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1081/CUS-200035363\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Toxicology-cutaneous and Ocular Toxicology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1081/CUS-200035363","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Selegiline Transdermal System (STS): Preclinical Assays of Dermal Safety
Two preclinical sensitization studies were conducted to determine the potential for allergic contact dermatitis with the selegiline transdermal system (STS), a novel transdermal system being developed to treat major depressive disorder. These included a qualitative structure‐activity relationship (QSAR) analysis to assess the allergic dermatitis potential of selegiline, and a guinea pig dermal sensitization study to determine the delayed contact hypersensitivity potential of the STS. In the QSAR analysis, selegiline was classified as a nonallergen. In the guinea pig study, the STS was found not to act as a dermal sensitizer. Thus, based upon the results of these two preclinical studies, treatment with the STS is unlikely to pose a risk of causing significant allergic contact dermatitis. Human data, reported elsewhere, support this hypothesis.