(设计)大声思考:图书馆创客空间桌面游戏设计营青少年设计对话

IF 1.6 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE Information and Learning Sciences Pub Date : 2021-08-10 DOI:10.1108/ils-08-2020-0185
T. Kessner, Priyanka Parekh, Earl Aguliera, Luis E. Pérez Cortés, Kelly Tran, Sinem Siyahhan, Elisabeth R. Gee
{"title":"(设计)大声思考:图书馆创客空间桌面游戏设计营青少年设计对话","authors":"T. Kessner, Priyanka Parekh, Earl Aguliera, Luis E. Pérez Cortés, Kelly Tran, Sinem Siyahhan, Elisabeth R. Gee","doi":"10.1108/ils-08-2020-0185","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Purpose This paper aims to explore how making tabletop board games elicited adolescents’ design thinking during their participation in a summer game design camp at their local library. Design/methodology/approach This study leverages qualitative approaches to coding transcripts of participants’ talk. This study uses the design thinking framework from the Hasso-Plattner Institute of Design at Stanford University as provisional codes to identify and make sense of participants’ verbalized design activity. Findings This study found that the making context of designing tabletop board games elicited a high frequency of design talk in participants, evidenced by both quantitative and qualitative reports of the data. Additionally, participants in large measure obviated constraints on their design activity imposed by linear conceptions of the design thinking model this study introduces, instead of moving fluidly across design modes. Finally, participants’ prior experiences in both life and in regard to games significantly influenced their design study. Originality/value This study highlights the unique affordances of making-centric approaches to designing tabletop games in particular, such as participants’ quick and sustained engagement in the study of design. This study also highlights the need for conceptions of design thinking specific to designing games.","PeriodicalId":44588,"journal":{"name":"Information and Learning Sciences","volume":"69 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"(Design) thinking out loud: adolescents’ design talk in a library makerspace tabletop game design camp\",\"authors\":\"T. Kessner, Priyanka Parekh, Earl Aguliera, Luis E. Pérez Cortés, Kelly Tran, Sinem Siyahhan, Elisabeth R. Gee\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/ils-08-2020-0185\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Purpose This paper aims to explore how making tabletop board games elicited adolescents’ design thinking during their participation in a summer game design camp at their local library. Design/methodology/approach This study leverages qualitative approaches to coding transcripts of participants’ talk. This study uses the design thinking framework from the Hasso-Plattner Institute of Design at Stanford University as provisional codes to identify and make sense of participants’ verbalized design activity. Findings This study found that the making context of designing tabletop board games elicited a high frequency of design talk in participants, evidenced by both quantitative and qualitative reports of the data. Additionally, participants in large measure obviated constraints on their design activity imposed by linear conceptions of the design thinking model this study introduces, instead of moving fluidly across design modes. Finally, participants’ prior experiences in both life and in regard to games significantly influenced their design study. Originality/value This study highlights the unique affordances of making-centric approaches to designing tabletop games in particular, such as participants’ quick and sustained engagement in the study of design. This study also highlights the need for conceptions of design thinking specific to designing games.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44588,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Information and Learning Sciences\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Information and Learning Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/ils-08-2020-0185\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Information and Learning Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/ils-08-2020-0185","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的本研究旨在探讨桌面游戏的制作如何在青少年参加当地图书馆的暑期游戏设计营时激发他们的设计思维。设计/方法/方法本研究利用定性方法对参与者的谈话文本进行编码。本研究采用斯坦福大学Hasso-Plattner设计研究所的设计思维框架作为临时代码来识别和理解参与者的语言化设计活动。研究结果:该研究发现,设计桌面游戏的制作背景会引起参与者高频的设计谈话,这可以从数据的定量和定性报告中得到证明。此外,参与者在很大程度上消除了本研究引入的设计思维模型的线性概念对他们的设计活动施加的限制,而不是在设计模式之间流畅地移动。最后,参与者在生活和游戏方面的经验显著影响了他们的设计研究。独创性/价值这项研究特别强调了以制作为中心的方法在设计桌面游戏方面的独特之处,比如参与者对设计研究的快速和持续参与。这项研究还强调了游戏设计需要特定的设计思维概念。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
(Design) thinking out loud: adolescents’ design talk in a library makerspace tabletop game design camp
Purpose This paper aims to explore how making tabletop board games elicited adolescents’ design thinking during their participation in a summer game design camp at their local library. Design/methodology/approach This study leverages qualitative approaches to coding transcripts of participants’ talk. This study uses the design thinking framework from the Hasso-Plattner Institute of Design at Stanford University as provisional codes to identify and make sense of participants’ verbalized design activity. Findings This study found that the making context of designing tabletop board games elicited a high frequency of design talk in participants, evidenced by both quantitative and qualitative reports of the data. Additionally, participants in large measure obviated constraints on their design activity imposed by linear conceptions of the design thinking model this study introduces, instead of moving fluidly across design modes. Finally, participants’ prior experiences in both life and in regard to games significantly influenced their design study. Originality/value This study highlights the unique affordances of making-centric approaches to designing tabletop games in particular, such as participants’ quick and sustained engagement in the study of design. This study also highlights the need for conceptions of design thinking specific to designing games.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Information and Learning Sciences
Information and Learning Sciences INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
9.50
自引率
2.90%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Information and Learning Sciences advances inter-disciplinary research that explores scholarly intersections shared within 2 key fields: information science and the learning sciences / education sciences. The journal provides a publication venue for work that strengthens our scholarly understanding of human inquiry and learning phenomena, especially as they relate to design and uses of information and e-learning systems innovations.
期刊最新文献
A critical (theory) data literacy: tales from the field Toward a new framework for teaching algorithmic literacy Promoting students’ informal inferential reasoning through arts-integrated data literacy education The data awareness framework as part of data literacies in K-12 education Learning experience network analysis for design-based research
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1