Gabriel R. Neto, Júlio C. G. Silva, Lucas Freitas, Hidayane Gonçalves da Silva Silva, Danillo Caldas, J. Novaes, Maria S Cirilo-Sousa
{"title":"持续或间歇血流量限制的力量训练对男性肥厚、肌肉力量和耐力的影响","authors":"Gabriel R. Neto, Júlio C. G. Silva, Lucas Freitas, Hidayane Gonçalves da Silva Silva, Danillo Caldas, J. Novaes, Maria S Cirilo-Sousa","doi":"10.4025/ACTASCIHEALTHSCI.V41I1.42273","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of strength training (ST) with continuous or intermittent blood flow restriction (BFR) on the muscle hypertrophy (MH), dynamic muscle strength (DMS), isometric muscle strength (IMS) and localized muscular endurance (LME) of healthy men. Twenty-five men with experience in ST were randomly divided into 3 experimental groups: a) 4 low-load exercises at 20% of the one-repetition maximum (1RM) combined with continuous BFR (LL+CBFR), b) 4 low-load exercises at 20% of 1RM combined with intermittent BFR (LL+IBFR); and c) 4 low-load exercises at 20% of 1RM without BFR (LL). Twelve sessions of ST were performed (twice a week for 6 weeks). There were no differences between groups for all variables (p > 0.05). However, there were significant differences in time for the LME in the triceps pulley only in the LL+CBFR group (p < 0.001) and in the biceps pulley in the groups LL+CBFR, LL+IBFR and LL (p < 0.001, p = 0.002, p = 0.032), respectively, with large magnitudes only for the two forms of the BFR. It can be concluded that continuous or intermittent BFR seems to be a good alternative for the increase of the LME of the upper limbs in single-joint exercises.","PeriodicalId":42839,"journal":{"name":"ACTA SCIENTIARUM-HEALTH SCIENCES","volume":"30 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of strength training with continuous or intermittent blood flow restriction on the hypertrophy, muscular strength and endurance of men\",\"authors\":\"Gabriel R. Neto, Júlio C. G. Silva, Lucas Freitas, Hidayane Gonçalves da Silva Silva, Danillo Caldas, J. Novaes, Maria S Cirilo-Sousa\",\"doi\":\"10.4025/ACTASCIHEALTHSCI.V41I1.42273\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of strength training (ST) with continuous or intermittent blood flow restriction (BFR) on the muscle hypertrophy (MH), dynamic muscle strength (DMS), isometric muscle strength (IMS) and localized muscular endurance (LME) of healthy men. Twenty-five men with experience in ST were randomly divided into 3 experimental groups: a) 4 low-load exercises at 20% of the one-repetition maximum (1RM) combined with continuous BFR (LL+CBFR), b) 4 low-load exercises at 20% of 1RM combined with intermittent BFR (LL+IBFR); and c) 4 low-load exercises at 20% of 1RM without BFR (LL). Twelve sessions of ST were performed (twice a week for 6 weeks). There were no differences between groups for all variables (p > 0.05). However, there were significant differences in time for the LME in the triceps pulley only in the LL+CBFR group (p < 0.001) and in the biceps pulley in the groups LL+CBFR, LL+IBFR and LL (p < 0.001, p = 0.002, p = 0.032), respectively, with large magnitudes only for the two forms of the BFR. It can be concluded that continuous or intermittent BFR seems to be a good alternative for the increase of the LME of the upper limbs in single-joint exercises.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42839,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACTA SCIENTIARUM-HEALTH SCIENCES\",\"volume\":\"30 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACTA SCIENTIARUM-HEALTH SCIENCES\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4025/ACTASCIHEALTHSCI.V41I1.42273\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACTA SCIENTIARUM-HEALTH SCIENCES","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4025/ACTASCIHEALTHSCI.V41I1.42273","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PUBLIC, ENVIRONMENTAL & OCCUPATIONAL HEALTH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7
摘要
本研究的目的是比较连续或间歇血流量限制(BFR)的力量训练(ST)对健康男性肌肉肥厚(MH)、动态肌肉力量(DMS)、等长肌肉力量(IMS)和局部肌肉耐力(LME)的影响。25名有ST训练经验的男性被随机分为3个实验组:a) 4项低负荷运动(1RM的20%)结合连续BFR (LL+CBFR), b) 4项低负荷运动(1RM的20%)结合间歇性BFR (LL+IBFR);c) 4次低负荷运动,强度为1RM的20%,无BFR (LL)。进行了12次ST(每周2次,共6周)。各组间各变量差异无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。然而,三头肌滑轮LME仅在LL+CBFR组(p < 0.001)以及二头肌滑轮在LL+CBFR、LL+IBFR和LL组(p < 0.001, p = 0.002, p = 0.032)的时间上存在显著差异,且仅两种形式的BFR存在较大差异。由此可见,对于单关节运动中上肢LME的增加,连续或间歇的BFR似乎是一个很好的选择。
Effects of strength training with continuous or intermittent blood flow restriction on the hypertrophy, muscular strength and endurance of men
The aim of the present study was to compare the effects of strength training (ST) with continuous or intermittent blood flow restriction (BFR) on the muscle hypertrophy (MH), dynamic muscle strength (DMS), isometric muscle strength (IMS) and localized muscular endurance (LME) of healthy men. Twenty-five men with experience in ST were randomly divided into 3 experimental groups: a) 4 low-load exercises at 20% of the one-repetition maximum (1RM) combined with continuous BFR (LL+CBFR), b) 4 low-load exercises at 20% of 1RM combined with intermittent BFR (LL+IBFR); and c) 4 low-load exercises at 20% of 1RM without BFR (LL). Twelve sessions of ST were performed (twice a week for 6 weeks). There were no differences between groups for all variables (p > 0.05). However, there were significant differences in time for the LME in the triceps pulley only in the LL+CBFR group (p < 0.001) and in the biceps pulley in the groups LL+CBFR, LL+IBFR and LL (p < 0.001, p = 0.002, p = 0.032), respectively, with large magnitudes only for the two forms of the BFR. It can be concluded that continuous or intermittent BFR seems to be a good alternative for the increase of the LME of the upper limbs in single-joint exercises.
期刊介绍:
The journal publishes original papers in Health Sciences, such as Clinical Analyses; Physical Education, Nursing, Pharmacy; Pharmacology, Phoniatry and Audiology, Physiotherapy and Occupational Therapy, Medicine, Nutrition, Dentistry and Public Health Policies.