新生儿气管插管闭合

IF 0.5 Q4 PEDIATRICS Journal of Pediatric Intensive Care Pub Date : 2022-09-29 DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1764154
N. Gaspar, G. Rocha, Américo Gonçalves
{"title":"新生儿气管插管闭合","authors":"N. Gaspar, G. Rocha, Américo Gonçalves","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1764154","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Cuffed endotracheal tubes (ETTs) are becoming increasingly used in neonates; nevertheless, current data in the literature mostly include infants over 3,000 g in weight. The aim of this study was to compare the use of cuffed and uncuffed ETTs in neonates in the neonatal intensive care unit of a tertiary children's hospital, assessing the presence of airway complications. We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study. Our study included all term neonates receiving cuffed ETTs over the period from January 2019 to December 2021. The controls were all neonates receiving an uncuffed ETT over the same period. Twenty-five patients were intubated with cuffed ETTs in the study period. The group receiving cuffed ETTs was compared with 53 patients receiving uncuffed ETTs. All cuffed ETTs were inserted in the operating room by anesthesiologists. Comparing the outcomes of the cuffed ETT group with controls, there were no significant differences in the number of unplanned extubations, reintubation episodes, ventilator-associated pneumonia, episodes of atelectasis, the use of dexamethasone, or vocal cord paresis. No unplanned extubation was observed in the cuffed ETT group, and no cases of subglottic stenosis were observed in either of the groups. This retrospective study with a small sample size suggests that the use of cuffed ETTs in surgical patients >2,000 g in weight is not associated with an increase in airway complications. Well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to compare cuffed ETTs with uncuffed ETTs.","PeriodicalId":44426,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Pediatric Intensive Care","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cuffed Endotracheal Tubes in Neonates\",\"authors\":\"N. Gaspar, G. Rocha, Américo Gonçalves\",\"doi\":\"10.1055/s-0043-1764154\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Cuffed endotracheal tubes (ETTs) are becoming increasingly used in neonates; nevertheless, current data in the literature mostly include infants over 3,000 g in weight. The aim of this study was to compare the use of cuffed and uncuffed ETTs in neonates in the neonatal intensive care unit of a tertiary children's hospital, assessing the presence of airway complications. We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study. Our study included all term neonates receiving cuffed ETTs over the period from January 2019 to December 2021. The controls were all neonates receiving an uncuffed ETT over the same period. Twenty-five patients were intubated with cuffed ETTs in the study period. The group receiving cuffed ETTs was compared with 53 patients receiving uncuffed ETTs. All cuffed ETTs were inserted in the operating room by anesthesiologists. Comparing the outcomes of the cuffed ETT group with controls, there were no significant differences in the number of unplanned extubations, reintubation episodes, ventilator-associated pneumonia, episodes of atelectasis, the use of dexamethasone, or vocal cord paresis. No unplanned extubation was observed in the cuffed ETT group, and no cases of subglottic stenosis were observed in either of the groups. This retrospective study with a small sample size suggests that the use of cuffed ETTs in surgical patients >2,000 g in weight is not associated with an increase in airway complications. Well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to compare cuffed ETTs with uncuffed ETTs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44426,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Pediatric Intensive Care\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Pediatric Intensive Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1764154\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"PEDIATRICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Pediatric Intensive Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1764154","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"PEDIATRICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:套管式气管插管(eta)在新生儿中的应用越来越广泛;然而,目前文献中的数据主要包括体重超过3000克的婴儿。本研究的目的是比较一家三级儿童医院新生儿重症监护病房新生儿使用带手铐和不带手铐的气管插管的情况,评估气道并发症的存在。我们进行了一项单中心回顾性队列研究。我们的研究包括了2019年1月至2021年12月期间所有接受袖口插管的足月新生儿。对照组是在同一时期接受无套气管插管的所有新生儿。在研究期间,有25例患者接受了袖口气管插管。与53名接受未戴手铐的患者进行比较。所有带手铐的气管插管均由麻醉师插入手术室。与对照组比较,非计划拔管次数、再插管次数、呼吸机相关性肺炎、肺不张次数、地塞米松使用次数或声带轻瘫次数均无显著差异。套筒ETT组未见意外拔管,两组均未见声门下狭窄病例。这项小样本量的回顾性研究表明,在体重> 2000 g的外科患者中使用带袖口气囊与气道并发症的增加无关。需要设计良好的随机对照试验来比较加箍的与未加箍的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cuffed Endotracheal Tubes in Neonates
Abstract Cuffed endotracheal tubes (ETTs) are becoming increasingly used in neonates; nevertheless, current data in the literature mostly include infants over 3,000 g in weight. The aim of this study was to compare the use of cuffed and uncuffed ETTs in neonates in the neonatal intensive care unit of a tertiary children's hospital, assessing the presence of airway complications. We performed a single-center retrospective cohort study. Our study included all term neonates receiving cuffed ETTs over the period from January 2019 to December 2021. The controls were all neonates receiving an uncuffed ETT over the same period. Twenty-five patients were intubated with cuffed ETTs in the study period. The group receiving cuffed ETTs was compared with 53 patients receiving uncuffed ETTs. All cuffed ETTs were inserted in the operating room by anesthesiologists. Comparing the outcomes of the cuffed ETT group with controls, there were no significant differences in the number of unplanned extubations, reintubation episodes, ventilator-associated pneumonia, episodes of atelectasis, the use of dexamethasone, or vocal cord paresis. No unplanned extubation was observed in the cuffed ETT group, and no cases of subglottic stenosis were observed in either of the groups. This retrospective study with a small sample size suggests that the use of cuffed ETTs in surgical patients >2,000 g in weight is not associated with an increase in airway complications. Well-designed randomized controlled trials are needed to compare cuffed ETTs with uncuffed ETTs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
14.30%
发文量
60
期刊最新文献
Harms Associated with Tracheal Reintubation After Unplanned Extubation: A Retrospective Cohort Study Kindergarten Readiness Assessment Scores in Children who Received Early Life Mechanical Ventilation in the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit “It Would Be All-Consuming”: Community Parents' Perceptions of the Pediatric Intensive Care Unit Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation: Rescue Therapy in Pediatric Bupropion Cardiotoxicity Social Disadvantage and Inequity in Access to Pediatric Critical Care Services for Children Living Remote from a Children's Hospital
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1