“这是我对感情的定义,尽管它不符合你的定义”:在单一规范的文化中生活在多角恋关系中

IF 2.4 3区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Psychology & Sexuality Pub Date : 2021-09-21 DOI:10.1080/19419899.2021.1982755
Ella Marie Sandbakken, Anita Skrautvol, Ole Jacob Madsen
{"title":"“这是我对感情的定义,尽管它不符合你的定义”:在单一规范的文化中生活在多角恋关系中","authors":"Ella Marie Sandbakken, Anita Skrautvol, Ole Jacob Madsen","doi":"10.1080/19419899.2021.1982755","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT One pervasive societal norm in Western societies is that of monogamy as the ‘natural’ way of practising relationships. Polyamorous individuals, who practise consensual non-monogamy, risk experiencing prejudice, discrimination, and marginalisation. The present study documents a thematic analysis of in-depth interviews with 11 Norwegian participants currently in polyamorous relationships, which resulted in three themes: (1) Wishing for normalisation; (2) Lack of literacy impedes recognition; and (3) The continuous consideration of disclosure. The results show that most participants experienced frequently being reminded of their relationship practice as ‘aberrant’ in the mononormative culture. In particular, participants stressed lack of recognition of their relationships as ‘real’, and linked this to scarce knowledge about what polyamory entails. Consequently, several participants considered carefully when to disclose their relationship structures, to avoid negative reactions from others. The study shows the consequences taken-for-granted norms can have for persons engaging in relationships that do not conform to these norms. Our study suggests that working towards a higher level of polyamory literacy, as well as a heightened awareness of the stressful environments the majority may unintentionally create for the polyamorous minority, is key to reduce minority stress for individuals living in other relationship structures than monogamy.","PeriodicalId":51686,"journal":{"name":"Psychology & Sexuality","volume":"67 1","pages":"1054 - 1067"},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-21","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"‘It’s my definition of a relationship, even though it doesn’t fit yours’: living in polyamorous relationships in a mononormative culture\",\"authors\":\"Ella Marie Sandbakken, Anita Skrautvol, Ole Jacob Madsen\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/19419899.2021.1982755\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT One pervasive societal norm in Western societies is that of monogamy as the ‘natural’ way of practising relationships. Polyamorous individuals, who practise consensual non-monogamy, risk experiencing prejudice, discrimination, and marginalisation. The present study documents a thematic analysis of in-depth interviews with 11 Norwegian participants currently in polyamorous relationships, which resulted in three themes: (1) Wishing for normalisation; (2) Lack of literacy impedes recognition; and (3) The continuous consideration of disclosure. The results show that most participants experienced frequently being reminded of their relationship practice as ‘aberrant’ in the mononormative culture. In particular, participants stressed lack of recognition of their relationships as ‘real’, and linked this to scarce knowledge about what polyamory entails. Consequently, several participants considered carefully when to disclose their relationship structures, to avoid negative reactions from others. The study shows the consequences taken-for-granted norms can have for persons engaging in relationships that do not conform to these norms. Our study suggests that working towards a higher level of polyamory literacy, as well as a heightened awareness of the stressful environments the majority may unintentionally create for the polyamorous minority, is key to reduce minority stress for individuals living in other relationship structures than monogamy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51686,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Psychology & Sexuality\",\"volume\":\"67 1\",\"pages\":\"1054 - 1067\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-21\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Psychology & Sexuality\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"102\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2021.1982755\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"心理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Psychology & Sexuality","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/19419899.2021.1982755","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

在西方社会,一夫一妻制是一种普遍的社会规范,是一种“自然”的人际关系方式。实行两厢情愿的非一夫一妻制的多角恋个体,有遭受偏见、歧视和边缘化的风险。本研究记录了对11位目前处于多角恋关系中的挪威参与者进行深入访谈的专题分析,结果得出三个主题:(1)希望正常化;(2)不识字妨碍识别;(3)持续考虑披露。结果表明,在单一规范的文化中,大多数参与者经常被提醒他们的关系实践是“异常的”。参与者特别强调,他们缺乏对自己关系“真实”的认识,并将此与对一夫多妻制所需知识的缺乏联系起来。因此,一些参与者仔细考虑了何时披露他们的关系结构,以避免其他人的负面反应。这项研究表明,被视为理所当然的规范可能会对那些不符合这些规范的人产生影响。我们的研究表明,提高对一夫多妻制的理解水平,以及提高对多数人可能无意中为一夫多妻制的少数人创造的压力环境的认识,是减少生活在一夫一妻制以外的其他关系结构中的少数人压力的关键。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
‘It’s my definition of a relationship, even though it doesn’t fit yours’: living in polyamorous relationships in a mononormative culture
ABSTRACT One pervasive societal norm in Western societies is that of monogamy as the ‘natural’ way of practising relationships. Polyamorous individuals, who practise consensual non-monogamy, risk experiencing prejudice, discrimination, and marginalisation. The present study documents a thematic analysis of in-depth interviews with 11 Norwegian participants currently in polyamorous relationships, which resulted in three themes: (1) Wishing for normalisation; (2) Lack of literacy impedes recognition; and (3) The continuous consideration of disclosure. The results show that most participants experienced frequently being reminded of their relationship practice as ‘aberrant’ in the mononormative culture. In particular, participants stressed lack of recognition of their relationships as ‘real’, and linked this to scarce knowledge about what polyamory entails. Consequently, several participants considered carefully when to disclose their relationship structures, to avoid negative reactions from others. The study shows the consequences taken-for-granted norms can have for persons engaging in relationships that do not conform to these norms. Our study suggests that working towards a higher level of polyamory literacy, as well as a heightened awareness of the stressful environments the majority may unintentionally create for the polyamorous minority, is key to reduce minority stress for individuals living in other relationship structures than monogamy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Psychology & Sexuality
Psychology & Sexuality PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
4.30%
发文量
36
期刊最新文献
The role of faith in the experience of grief among sexually diverse individuals: a systematic review Do attitude functions and perceiver demographics predict attitudes towards asexuality? Holding hands: LGBTQ people’s experiences of public displays of affection with their partner(s) Changing beliefs about gender: the relation between contact with gender nonconforming individuals and gender essentialism Functional, communicative, and hybrid barriers to accessing mental health care in LGBTQ+ communities
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1