去工业化理论的激进起源

IF 0.5 4区 经济学 Q1 HISTORY Labour-Le Travail Pub Date : 2023-05-25 DOI:10.52975/llt.2023v91.005
Steven High
{"title":"去工业化理论的激进起源","authors":"Steven High","doi":"10.52975/llt.2023v91.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Deindustrialization became a pressing political issue and an object of research almost simultaneously in North America. This article inquires into the intellectual origins and radical roots of the deindustrialization thesis in Canada and the United States. Though the two countries share much in common, their distinctive formulations of the deindustrial problem in the 1970s and 1980s reflected key economic and political differences between them. Radical political economists in Canada and the United States turned to dependency theory and capital flight, respectively, in their theorization of deindustrialization. Barry Bluestone and Bennett Harrison’s 1982 book, The Deindustrialization of America, in particular, is a founding text for the burgeoning field of deindustrialization studies. We can learn much from re-engaging with this early scholarship. In doing so, however, we need to bridge the continuing analytical divide between micro-level labour histories of working-class communities and macro-level studies of political economy and the international division of labour.","PeriodicalId":33140,"journal":{"name":"Labour-Le Travail","volume":"16 4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Radical Origins of the Deindustrialization Thesis\",\"authors\":\"Steven High\",\"doi\":\"10.52975/llt.2023v91.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Deindustrialization became a pressing political issue and an object of research almost simultaneously in North America. This article inquires into the intellectual origins and radical roots of the deindustrialization thesis in Canada and the United States. Though the two countries share much in common, their distinctive formulations of the deindustrial problem in the 1970s and 1980s reflected key economic and political differences between them. Radical political economists in Canada and the United States turned to dependency theory and capital flight, respectively, in their theorization of deindustrialization. Barry Bluestone and Bennett Harrison’s 1982 book, The Deindustrialization of America, in particular, is a founding text for the burgeoning field of deindustrialization studies. We can learn much from re-engaging with this early scholarship. In doing so, however, we need to bridge the continuing analytical divide between micro-level labour histories of working-class communities and macro-level studies of political economy and the international division of labour.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Labour-Le Travail\",\"volume\":\"16 4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Labour-Le Travail\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52975/llt.2023v91.005\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Labour-Le Travail","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52975/llt.2023v91.005","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在北美,去工业化几乎同时成为一个紧迫的政治问题和研究对象。本文探讨了加拿大和美国去工业化理论的思想渊源和激进根源。尽管这两个国家有很多共同之处,但它们在20世纪70年代和80年代对去工业化问题的独特表述反映了它们之间关键的经济和政治差异。加拿大和美国的激进政治经济学家在他们的去工业化理论中分别转向依赖理论和资本外逃理论。尤其是巴里·布鲁斯通和班尼特·哈里森1982年的著作《美国的去工业化》,是新兴的去工业化研究领域的奠基之作。我们可以从重新参与早期的研究中学到很多东西。然而,在这样做的过程中,我们需要弥合工人阶级社区的微观劳动历史与政治经济学和国际劳动分工的宏观研究之间持续存在的分析鸿沟。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Radical Origins of the Deindustrialization Thesis
Deindustrialization became a pressing political issue and an object of research almost simultaneously in North America. This article inquires into the intellectual origins and radical roots of the deindustrialization thesis in Canada and the United States. Though the two countries share much in common, their distinctive formulations of the deindustrial problem in the 1970s and 1980s reflected key economic and political differences between them. Radical political economists in Canada and the United States turned to dependency theory and capital flight, respectively, in their theorization of deindustrialization. Barry Bluestone and Bennett Harrison’s 1982 book, The Deindustrialization of America, in particular, is a founding text for the burgeoning field of deindustrialization studies. We can learn much from re-engaging with this early scholarship. In doing so, however, we need to bridge the continuing analytical divide between micro-level labour histories of working-class communities and macro-level studies of political economy and the international division of labour.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Labour-Le Travail
Labour-Le Travail Multiple-
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
43
期刊最新文献
Jacinthe Michaud, Frontiers of Feminism: Movements and Influences in Québec and Italy, 1960–1980 (Vancouver: UBC Press, 2021) Krys Maki, Ineligible: Single Mothers Under Welfare Surveillance (Halifax and Winnipeg: Fernwood Publishing 2021) Mark Doussar and Greg Schrock, Justice at work: The Rise of Economic and Racial Justice Coalitions in Cities (Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press 2022) Left Americana and the Ludlow Monument Contributors / Collaborateurs
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1