墨西哥地热能的发展——第三部分:井口与中央发电厂的经济对比

Gerardo Hiriart Le Bert
{"title":"墨西哥地热能的发展——第三部分:井口与中央发电厂的经济对比","authors":"Gerardo Hiriart Le Bert","doi":"10.1016/0198-7593(86)90002-0","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>A comparative economic analysis has been made between a single 110 MW<sub>e</sub> plant using concentrated steam from various wells, condensers and extractors for non-condensable gases to maximize its efficiency, and a system of 22 units, each with a capacity of 5 MW<sub>e</sub>, with the steam discharged at atmospheric pressure.</p><p>The costs used for this comparison have been obtained from experience in Mexican geothermal fields at both Cerro Prieto and Los Azufres. It is concluded that the second alternative is very attractive and should be analyzed in detail for each project where both the production of steam and the generation of electricity are contemplated.</p><p>The results of this analysis were presented at a Geothermal Conference and Workshop held at San Diego, California, U.S.A. in July 1985 sponsored by the Instituto de Investigaciones Electricas, Cuernavaca, Mexico and the Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California, U.S.A.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100786,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Heat Recovery Systems","volume":"6 3","pages":"Pages 191-200"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1986-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0198-7593(86)90002-0","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Developments in geothermal energy in Mexico—Part three: Economics of wellhead versus central power plants\",\"authors\":\"Gerardo Hiriart Le Bert\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0198-7593(86)90002-0\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>A comparative economic analysis has been made between a single 110 MW<sub>e</sub> plant using concentrated steam from various wells, condensers and extractors for non-condensable gases to maximize its efficiency, and a system of 22 units, each with a capacity of 5 MW<sub>e</sub>, with the steam discharged at atmospheric pressure.</p><p>The costs used for this comparison have been obtained from experience in Mexican geothermal fields at both Cerro Prieto and Los Azufres. It is concluded that the second alternative is very attractive and should be analyzed in detail for each project where both the production of steam and the generation of electricity are contemplated.</p><p>The results of this analysis were presented at a Geothermal Conference and Workshop held at San Diego, California, U.S.A. in July 1985 sponsored by the Instituto de Investigaciones Electricas, Cuernavaca, Mexico and the Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California, U.S.A.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100786,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Heat Recovery Systems\",\"volume\":\"6 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 191-200\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1986-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0198-7593(86)90002-0\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Heat Recovery Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0198759386900020\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Heat Recovery Systems","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0198759386900020","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

一个110 MWe的单一电厂,利用来自不同井的浓缩蒸汽、冷凝器和提取器来最大限度地提高其效率,与一个22个机组的系统,每个容量为5 MWe,蒸汽在大气压下排放,进行了比较经济分析。用于这一比较的费用是根据墨西哥塞罗·普列托和洛斯·阿祖雷斯地热田的经验得出的。结论是,第二种替代方案非常有吸引力,应该对每个项目进行详细分析,其中考虑到蒸汽生产和发电。这项分析的结果于1985年7月在美国加利福尼亚州圣地亚哥举行的地热会议和讲习班上提出,该会议和讲习班由墨西哥库埃纳瓦卡电力研究所和美国加利福尼亚州帕洛阿尔托电力研究所主办
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Developments in geothermal energy in Mexico—Part three: Economics of wellhead versus central power plants

A comparative economic analysis has been made between a single 110 MWe plant using concentrated steam from various wells, condensers and extractors for non-condensable gases to maximize its efficiency, and a system of 22 units, each with a capacity of 5 MWe, with the steam discharged at atmospheric pressure.

The costs used for this comparison have been obtained from experience in Mexican geothermal fields at both Cerro Prieto and Los Azufres. It is concluded that the second alternative is very attractive and should be analyzed in detail for each project where both the production of steam and the generation of electricity are contemplated.

The results of this analysis were presented at a Geothermal Conference and Workshop held at San Diego, California, U.S.A. in July 1985 sponsored by the Instituto de Investigaciones Electricas, Cuernavaca, Mexico and the Electric Power Research Institute, Palo Alto, California, U.S.A.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Editorial Editorial Board Announcement Erratum Energy recovery ventilator
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1