烧伤专科护理中的虚弱筛查实践--一项回顾性多中心队列研究。

IF 1 Q4 CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE European burn journal Pub Date : 2023-02-13 DOI:10.3390/ebj4010009
Charlotte I Cords, Cornelis H van der Vlies, Matthea Stoop, Marianne K Nieuwenhuis, Kris Boudestein, Francesco U S Mattace-Raso, Margriet E van Baar, Frail Group, Dutch Burn Repository Group
{"title":"烧伤专科护理中的虚弱筛查实践--一项回顾性多中心队列研究。","authors":"Charlotte I Cords, Cornelis H van der Vlies, Matthea Stoop, Marianne K Nieuwenhuis, Kris Boudestein, Francesco U S Mattace-Raso, Margriet E van Baar, Frail Group, Dutch Burn Repository Group","doi":"10.3390/ebj4010009","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><i>Background:</i> Frailty can have a negative influence on outcomes in elderly patients after burn injuries. The Dutch hospitals have used a four-domain frailty screening instrument from the Dutch Safety Management System (DSMS) since 2012. However, its feasibility and validity have hardly been studied. We aim to assess the feasibility and validity of frailty screening in specialized burn care. <i>Methods:</i> A multicentre retrospective cohort study was conducted in all Dutch burn centres. Patients aged ≥ 70, with a primary admission between 2012-2018, were included. Data were derived from electronic patient files. <i>Results:</i> In total, 515 patients were included. Frailty screening was complete in 39.6% and partially complete in 23.9%. Determinants for a complete screening were admission after 2015 (OR = 2.15, 95% CI 1.42-3.25) and lower percentage TBSA burned (OR = 0.12, 95% CI 0.05-029). In all completely screened patients, 49.9% were at risk of frailty. At risk patients were older, had more comorbidities (known group validity), a longer length of stay, and more frequently a non-home discharge (predictive validity). <i>Conclusion:</i> Frailty screening in specialized burn care is feasible and was conducted in 63.5% of admitted patients. In total, 44% of screened patients were at risk of frailty. Validity of frailty screening was confirmed. Frailty screening can contribute to optimal specialized burn care.</p>","PeriodicalId":72961,"journal":{"name":"European burn journal","volume":"211 1","pages":"87-100"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571870/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Frailty Screening Practice in Specialized Burn Care-A Retrospective Multicentre Cohort Study.\",\"authors\":\"Charlotte I Cords, Cornelis H van der Vlies, Matthea Stoop, Marianne K Nieuwenhuis, Kris Boudestein, Francesco U S Mattace-Raso, Margriet E van Baar, Frail Group, Dutch Burn Repository Group\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/ebj4010009\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><i>Background:</i> Frailty can have a negative influence on outcomes in elderly patients after burn injuries. The Dutch hospitals have used a four-domain frailty screening instrument from the Dutch Safety Management System (DSMS) since 2012. However, its feasibility and validity have hardly been studied. We aim to assess the feasibility and validity of frailty screening in specialized burn care. <i>Methods:</i> A multicentre retrospective cohort study was conducted in all Dutch burn centres. Patients aged ≥ 70, with a primary admission between 2012-2018, were included. Data were derived from electronic patient files. <i>Results:</i> In total, 515 patients were included. Frailty screening was complete in 39.6% and partially complete in 23.9%. Determinants for a complete screening were admission after 2015 (OR = 2.15, 95% CI 1.42-3.25) and lower percentage TBSA burned (OR = 0.12, 95% CI 0.05-029). In all completely screened patients, 49.9% were at risk of frailty. At risk patients were older, had more comorbidities (known group validity), a longer length of stay, and more frequently a non-home discharge (predictive validity). <i>Conclusion:</i> Frailty screening in specialized burn care is feasible and was conducted in 63.5% of admitted patients. In total, 44% of screened patients were at risk of frailty. Validity of frailty screening was confirmed. Frailty screening can contribute to optimal specialized burn care.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72961,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European burn journal\",\"volume\":\"211 1\",\"pages\":\"87-100\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11571870/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European burn journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/ebj4010009\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European burn journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/ebj4010009","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CRITICAL CARE MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:虚弱会对烧伤后老年患者的预后产生负面影响。荷兰医院自 2012 年起开始使用荷兰安全管理系统 (DSMS) 中的四域虚弱筛查工具。然而,对其可行性和有效性几乎没有进行过研究。我们旨在评估烧伤专科护理中虚弱筛查的可行性和有效性。方法:在荷兰所有烧伤中心开展了一项多中心回顾性队列研究。研究对象包括年龄≥ 70 岁、2012 年至 2018 年期间初次入院的患者。数据来自患者电子档案。研究结果共纳入 515 名患者。39.6%的患者完成了虚弱筛查,23.9%的患者部分完成了虚弱筛查。完全筛查的决定因素是 2015 年后入院(OR = 2.15,95% CI 1.42-3.25)和较低的烧伤 TBSA 百分比(OR = 0.12,95% CI 0.05-029)。在所有经过全面筛查的患者中,49.9%的患者存在虚弱风险。高危患者年龄较大、合并症较多(已知组别有效性)、住院时间较长、非居家出院次数较多(预测有效性)。结论在烧伤专科护理中进行虚弱筛查是可行的,63.5% 的入院患者接受了筛查。在接受筛查的患者中,共有 44% 存在虚弱风险。虚弱筛查的有效性已得到证实。虚弱筛查有助于优化烧伤专科护理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Frailty Screening Practice in Specialized Burn Care-A Retrospective Multicentre Cohort Study.

Background: Frailty can have a negative influence on outcomes in elderly patients after burn injuries. The Dutch hospitals have used a four-domain frailty screening instrument from the Dutch Safety Management System (DSMS) since 2012. However, its feasibility and validity have hardly been studied. We aim to assess the feasibility and validity of frailty screening in specialized burn care. Methods: A multicentre retrospective cohort study was conducted in all Dutch burn centres. Patients aged ≥ 70, with a primary admission between 2012-2018, were included. Data were derived from electronic patient files. Results: In total, 515 patients were included. Frailty screening was complete in 39.6% and partially complete in 23.9%. Determinants for a complete screening were admission after 2015 (OR = 2.15, 95% CI 1.42-3.25) and lower percentage TBSA burned (OR = 0.12, 95% CI 0.05-029). In all completely screened patients, 49.9% were at risk of frailty. At risk patients were older, had more comorbidities (known group validity), a longer length of stay, and more frequently a non-home discharge (predictive validity). Conclusion: Frailty screening in specialized burn care is feasible and was conducted in 63.5% of admitted patients. In total, 44% of screened patients were at risk of frailty. Validity of frailty screening was confirmed. Frailty screening can contribute to optimal specialized burn care.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Diagnosis and Treatment of Infections in the Burn Patient. High-Voltage Electrical Burn Requiring Urgent Scalp Reconstruction after Developing a Brain Abscess. Introduction to the Special Issue on Wars and Disasters: Advancing Care during Times of Crisis. The Successful Treatment of Multi-Resistant Colonized Burns with Large-Area Atmospheric Cold Plasma Therapy and Dermis Substitute Matrix-A Case Report. Sustainable Primary Cell Banking for Topical Compound Cytotoxicity Assays: Protocol Validation on Novel Biocides and Antifungals for Optimized Burn Wound Care.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1