{"title":"继续医学教育中的利益冲突——认证机构应该怎么做?","authors":"R. Griebenow","doi":"10.1002/CCE2.15","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The issue of competing interests is pertinent to all areas of medicine – ranging from research to CME [1]. Transparency is considered to be a key prerequisite in order to identify and manage competing interests. Thus, all major accreditors make it mandatory that providers of accredited CME must have a strategy in place for how to declare and manage competing interests of program committee members and all faculties. Communication of interests has traditionally been facing several problems:","PeriodicalId":100331,"journal":{"name":"Continuing Cardiology Education","volume":"4 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Competing interests in continuing medical education – what should accreditors do?\",\"authors\":\"R. Griebenow\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/CCE2.15\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The issue of competing interests is pertinent to all areas of medicine – ranging from research to CME [1]. Transparency is considered to be a key prerequisite in order to identify and manage competing interests. Thus, all major accreditors make it mandatory that providers of accredited CME must have a strategy in place for how to declare and manage competing interests of program committee members and all faculties. Communication of interests has traditionally been facing several problems:\",\"PeriodicalId\":100331,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Continuing Cardiology Education\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Continuing Cardiology Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/CCE2.15\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Continuing Cardiology Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/CCE2.15","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Competing interests in continuing medical education – what should accreditors do?
The issue of competing interests is pertinent to all areas of medicine – ranging from research to CME [1]. Transparency is considered to be a key prerequisite in order to identify and manage competing interests. Thus, all major accreditors make it mandatory that providers of accredited CME must have a strategy in place for how to declare and manage competing interests of program committee members and all faculties. Communication of interests has traditionally been facing several problems:
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
