大恐怖前夕哈尔科夫地区的状态与忏悔生活(1934 - 1937年年中)

Yurii Volosnyk
{"title":"大恐怖前夕哈尔科夫地区的状态与忏悔生活(1934 - 1937年年中)","authors":"Yurii Volosnyk","doi":"10.26565/2220-7929-2022-61-03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article is dedicated to religious life in Kharkiv region on the eve of The Great Terror and the influence of the Soviet state on it. The article analyzes the historiography of the issue under study, and concludes that despite the emergence of recent scientific works, which address various aspects of the functioning of individual religious denominations in Kharkiv region in the 1930s, the issue of reviving religious life in the region on the eve of The Great Terror unleashed by the totalitarian regime is still virtually out of sight of modern scientists and has not become an object of special study. Such processes as the believers’ reaction to the state’s activity, their resistance against the state’s oppression, the influence of the Constitution of 1936 on the religious circumstances, as well as the factors of religious life in Kharkiv province on the eve of the Great Terror have not been sufficiently studied yet. The article analyzes the conditions of religious denominations’ activity on the eve of the Great Terror. The influence of various factors on the revival of religious life is revealed. The different forms of manifestation of religious activity in Kharkiv region are elucidated. The article shows that the public discussion and adoption of the Constitution of 1936, which formally abolished the restrictions on the political rights of the clergy and proclaimed the freedom of conscience, resulted in increased activity of different groups of clergy and believers. The latter hoped for rapid normalization and liberalization of state-confessional relations. However, the revival took place in the situation when the previous practice of repression against members of various religious denominations and the closure of temples and prayer houses still continued. In these circumstances there were the different form of believers’ resistance and the defense of the religious rights which were decelerated by the laws. This activity of \"the religious\" did not go beyond the limits set by the current Soviet legislation and was generally aimed at ensuring freedom of conscience for citizens as proclaimed in the Constitution. In particular, this manifested itself in believers’ attempts to collect signatures to open churches closed (contrary to the existing law) by local authorities, and in numerous petitions and delegations to local and higher authorities, demanding that the prayer houses be returned to the religious communities. Religious communities actively also created various circles (choral singing, chess, etc.) in order to attract young people. There were appeals from the representatives of religious communities to consular offices of foreign countries for support against anti-religious harassment, etc. At the same time, the participation of believers (especially young people) in public worship and mass attendance of religious services, especially during church festivals, etc. intensified. The 1937 census revealed a high level of religiosity among the population (including the younger generation) which was conclusive proof of the failure of Stalin's “Godless Five-Year Plan.” Another important factor in stirring up religious life was the preparation and holding of elections to the Supreme Council of the USSR according to the new electoral laws, during which a fairly high level of self-organization of the clergy and believers were shown to the authorities, as well as their attempts to participate in the electoral race. It seriously frightened the nomenclature of the Soviet Communist Party, which perceived religion and the church as the institutions of the class enemies (according to their ideological paradigm). So they were regarding the state terror as the most effective method of struggle against the religion.","PeriodicalId":33522,"journal":{"name":"Visnik Kharkivs''kogo natsional''nogo universitetu imeni VN Karazina Seriia Ekonomika","volume":"13 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The State and Confessional Life in Kharkiv Region on the Eve of the Great Terror (1934 – the Middle of 1937)\",\"authors\":\"Yurii Volosnyk\",\"doi\":\"10.26565/2220-7929-2022-61-03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article is dedicated to religious life in Kharkiv region on the eve of The Great Terror and the influence of the Soviet state on it. The article analyzes the historiography of the issue under study, and concludes that despite the emergence of recent scientific works, which address various aspects of the functioning of individual religious denominations in Kharkiv region in the 1930s, the issue of reviving religious life in the region on the eve of The Great Terror unleashed by the totalitarian regime is still virtually out of sight of modern scientists and has not become an object of special study. Such processes as the believers’ reaction to the state’s activity, their resistance against the state’s oppression, the influence of the Constitution of 1936 on the religious circumstances, as well as the factors of religious life in Kharkiv province on the eve of the Great Terror have not been sufficiently studied yet. The article analyzes the conditions of religious denominations’ activity on the eve of the Great Terror. The influence of various factors on the revival of religious life is revealed. The different forms of manifestation of religious activity in Kharkiv region are elucidated. The article shows that the public discussion and adoption of the Constitution of 1936, which formally abolished the restrictions on the political rights of the clergy and proclaimed the freedom of conscience, resulted in increased activity of different groups of clergy and believers. The latter hoped for rapid normalization and liberalization of state-confessional relations. However, the revival took place in the situation when the previous practice of repression against members of various religious denominations and the closure of temples and prayer houses still continued. In these circumstances there were the different form of believers’ resistance and the defense of the religious rights which were decelerated by the laws. This activity of \\\"the religious\\\" did not go beyond the limits set by the current Soviet legislation and was generally aimed at ensuring freedom of conscience for citizens as proclaimed in the Constitution. In particular, this manifested itself in believers’ attempts to collect signatures to open churches closed (contrary to the existing law) by local authorities, and in numerous petitions and delegations to local and higher authorities, demanding that the prayer houses be returned to the religious communities. Religious communities actively also created various circles (choral singing, chess, etc.) in order to attract young people. There were appeals from the representatives of religious communities to consular offices of foreign countries for support against anti-religious harassment, etc. At the same time, the participation of believers (especially young people) in public worship and mass attendance of religious services, especially during church festivals, etc. intensified. The 1937 census revealed a high level of religiosity among the population (including the younger generation) which was conclusive proof of the failure of Stalin's “Godless Five-Year Plan.” Another important factor in stirring up religious life was the preparation and holding of elections to the Supreme Council of the USSR according to the new electoral laws, during which a fairly high level of self-organization of the clergy and believers were shown to the authorities, as well as their attempts to participate in the electoral race. It seriously frightened the nomenclature of the Soviet Communist Party, which perceived religion and the church as the institutions of the class enemies (according to their ideological paradigm). So they were regarding the state terror as the most effective method of struggle against the religion.\",\"PeriodicalId\":33522,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Visnik Kharkivs''kogo natsional''nogo universitetu imeni VN Karazina Seriia Ekonomika\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Visnik Kharkivs''kogo natsional''nogo universitetu imeni VN Karazina Seriia Ekonomika\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26565/2220-7929-2022-61-03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Visnik Kharkivs''kogo natsional''nogo universitetu imeni VN Karazina Seriia Ekonomika","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26565/2220-7929-2022-61-03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这篇文章致力于描述大恐怖前夕哈尔科夫地区的宗教生活以及苏维埃国家对其的影响。本文分析了所研究问题的史学,并得出结论,尽管最近出现了一些科学著作,这些著作论述了20世纪30年代哈尔科夫地区各个宗教教派的运作,但在极权政权释放的大恐怖前夕,该地区宗教生活的复兴问题实际上仍然不在现代科学家的视线之内,也没有成为一个专门研究的对象。信徒对国家活动的反应,对国家压迫的反抗,1936年宪法对宗教环境的影响,以及大恐怖前夕哈尔科夫省宗教生活的因素等过程尚未得到充分研究。本文分析了大恐怖前夕宗教界的活动状况。揭示了各种因素对宗教生活复兴的影响。阐明了哈尔科夫地区宗教活动的不同表现形式。1936年《宪法》正式废除了对神职人员政治权利的限制,宣布了信仰自由,公众的讨论和通过导致了不同神职人员和信徒群体的活动增加。后者希望国与国之间的关系迅速正常化和自由化。但是,这次复兴是在以前镇压各种宗教教派成员和关闭寺庙和祈祷所的做法仍然继续的情况下发生的。在这种情况下,宗教信仰者以不同的形式反抗和捍卫宗教权利,但这些反抗和捍卫都被法律所减缓。“宗教人士”的这种活动没有超出苏联现行立法所规定的范围,其总体目的是确保《宪法》所宣布的公民的良心自由。这一点特别表现在信徒试图收集签名,以开放被地方当局(违反现行法律)关闭的教堂,并向地方和上级当局提出无数请愿书和代表团,要求将祈祷所归还给宗教社区。宗教团体也积极创建各种圈子(合唱、象棋等),以吸引年轻人。宗教团体的代表呼吁外国领事馆支持反对反宗教骚扰等。与此同时,信教群众(特别是青年信教群众)参与公开礼拜和集体参加宗教活动,特别是在教堂节日等活动的情况有所加强。1937年的人口普查显示,人口(包括年轻一代)的宗教虔诚程度很高,这是斯大林“无神论五年计划”失败的决定性证据。搅动宗教生活的另一个重要因素是根据新的选举法准备和举行苏联最高委员会的选举,在此期间,神职人员和信徒向当局展示了相当高水平的自我组织,以及他们参加选举的企图。它严重吓坏了苏联共产党的命名法,他们认为宗教和教会是阶级敌人的机构(根据他们的意识形态范式)。因此,他们将国家恐怖主义视为与宗教斗争的最有效方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The State and Confessional Life in Kharkiv Region on the Eve of the Great Terror (1934 – the Middle of 1937)
The article is dedicated to religious life in Kharkiv region on the eve of The Great Terror and the influence of the Soviet state on it. The article analyzes the historiography of the issue under study, and concludes that despite the emergence of recent scientific works, which address various aspects of the functioning of individual religious denominations in Kharkiv region in the 1930s, the issue of reviving religious life in the region on the eve of The Great Terror unleashed by the totalitarian regime is still virtually out of sight of modern scientists and has not become an object of special study. Such processes as the believers’ reaction to the state’s activity, their resistance against the state’s oppression, the influence of the Constitution of 1936 on the religious circumstances, as well as the factors of religious life in Kharkiv province on the eve of the Great Terror have not been sufficiently studied yet. The article analyzes the conditions of religious denominations’ activity on the eve of the Great Terror. The influence of various factors on the revival of religious life is revealed. The different forms of manifestation of religious activity in Kharkiv region are elucidated. The article shows that the public discussion and adoption of the Constitution of 1936, which formally abolished the restrictions on the political rights of the clergy and proclaimed the freedom of conscience, resulted in increased activity of different groups of clergy and believers. The latter hoped for rapid normalization and liberalization of state-confessional relations. However, the revival took place in the situation when the previous practice of repression against members of various religious denominations and the closure of temples and prayer houses still continued. In these circumstances there were the different form of believers’ resistance and the defense of the religious rights which were decelerated by the laws. This activity of "the religious" did not go beyond the limits set by the current Soviet legislation and was generally aimed at ensuring freedom of conscience for citizens as proclaimed in the Constitution. In particular, this manifested itself in believers’ attempts to collect signatures to open churches closed (contrary to the existing law) by local authorities, and in numerous petitions and delegations to local and higher authorities, demanding that the prayer houses be returned to the religious communities. Religious communities actively also created various circles (choral singing, chess, etc.) in order to attract young people. There were appeals from the representatives of religious communities to consular offices of foreign countries for support against anti-religious harassment, etc. At the same time, the participation of believers (especially young people) in public worship and mass attendance of religious services, especially during church festivals, etc. intensified. The 1937 census revealed a high level of religiosity among the population (including the younger generation) which was conclusive proof of the failure of Stalin's “Godless Five-Year Plan.” Another important factor in stirring up religious life was the preparation and holding of elections to the Supreme Council of the USSR according to the new electoral laws, during which a fairly high level of self-organization of the clergy and believers were shown to the authorities, as well as their attempts to participate in the electoral race. It seriously frightened the nomenclature of the Soviet Communist Party, which perceived religion and the church as the institutions of the class enemies (according to their ideological paradigm). So they were regarding the state terror as the most effective method of struggle against the religion.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Rethinking the business process through reengineering Clinical trials market: state and prospects, IT segment The use of tools of business communication culture during business negotiations Ecologization of production as an innovative direction for the development of domestic business entities Multifactor econometric models of the standard of living of the population
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1