从实验室到临床实践:了解生物制药免疫原性检测的挑战和不确定性

G. Gunn, D. C. F. Sealey, F. Jamali, B. Meibohm, S. Ghosh, G. Shankar
{"title":"从实验室到临床实践:了解生物制药免疫原性检测的挑战和不确定性","authors":"G. Gunn, D. C. F. Sealey, F. Jamali, B. Meibohm, S. Ghosh, G. Shankar","doi":"10.1111/cei.12742","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Unlike conventional chemical drugs where immunogenicity typically does not occur, the development of anti‐drug antibodies following treatment with biologics has led to concerns about their impact on clinical safety and efficacy. Hence the elucidation of the immunogenicity of biologics is required for drug approval by health regulatory authorities worldwide. Published ADA ‘incidence’ rates can vary greatly between same‐class products and different patient populations. Such differences are due to disparate bioanalytical methods and interpretation approaches, as well as a plethora of product‐specific and patient‐specific factors that are not fully understood. Therefore, the incidence of ADA and their association with clinical consequences cannot be generalized across products. In this context, the intent of this review article is to discuss the complex nature of ADA and key nuances of the methodologies used for immunogenicity assessments, and to dispel some fallacies and myths.","PeriodicalId":10179,"journal":{"name":"Clinical & Experimental Immunology","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"76","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From the bench to clinical practice: understanding the challenges and uncertainties in immunogenicity testing for biopharmaceuticals\",\"authors\":\"G. Gunn, D. C. F. Sealey, F. Jamali, B. Meibohm, S. Ghosh, G. Shankar\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/cei.12742\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Unlike conventional chemical drugs where immunogenicity typically does not occur, the development of anti‐drug antibodies following treatment with biologics has led to concerns about their impact on clinical safety and efficacy. Hence the elucidation of the immunogenicity of biologics is required for drug approval by health regulatory authorities worldwide. Published ADA ‘incidence’ rates can vary greatly between same‐class products and different patient populations. Such differences are due to disparate bioanalytical methods and interpretation approaches, as well as a plethora of product‐specific and patient‐specific factors that are not fully understood. Therefore, the incidence of ADA and their association with clinical consequences cannot be generalized across products. In this context, the intent of this review article is to discuss the complex nature of ADA and key nuances of the methodologies used for immunogenicity assessments, and to dispel some fallacies and myths.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10179,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Clinical & Experimental Immunology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"76\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Clinical & Experimental Immunology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/cei.12742\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Clinical & Experimental Immunology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/cei.12742","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 76

摘要

与通常不发生免疫原性的传统化学药物不同,生物制剂治疗后抗药物抗体的发展引起了人们对其对临床安全性和有效性影响的担忧。因此,阐明生物制剂的免疫原性是全球卫生监管部门批准药物的必要条件。公布的《美国残疾人法》“发病率”在同一类产品和不同患者群体之间差异很大。这种差异是由于不同的生物分析方法和解释方法,以及大量的产品特异性和患者特异性因素尚未完全了解。因此,ADA的发生率及其与临床后果的关系不能一概而论。在这种背景下,这篇综述文章的目的是讨论ADA的复杂性和用于免疫原性评估的方法的关键细微差别,并消除一些谬论和神话。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
From the bench to clinical practice: understanding the challenges and uncertainties in immunogenicity testing for biopharmaceuticals
Unlike conventional chemical drugs where immunogenicity typically does not occur, the development of anti‐drug antibodies following treatment with biologics has led to concerns about their impact on clinical safety and efficacy. Hence the elucidation of the immunogenicity of biologics is required for drug approval by health regulatory authorities worldwide. Published ADA ‘incidence’ rates can vary greatly between same‐class products and different patient populations. Such differences are due to disparate bioanalytical methods and interpretation approaches, as well as a plethora of product‐specific and patient‐specific factors that are not fully understood. Therefore, the incidence of ADA and their association with clinical consequences cannot be generalized across products. In this context, the intent of this review article is to discuss the complex nature of ADA and key nuances of the methodologies used for immunogenicity assessments, and to dispel some fallacies and myths.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Redundant role of PAD2 and PAD4 in the development of cardiovascular lesions in a mouse model of Kawasaki Disease vasculitis CpG Oligodeoxynucleotide-Coated Chitosan Nanoparticles Enhance Macrophage Proinflammatory Phenotype In Vitro Follow-up of Immune Response in Patients with Common Variable Immunodeficiency following SARS-CoV-2 Vaccination Immune profiling reveals umbilical cord blood mononuclear cells from South India display an IL-8 dominant, CXCL-10 deficient polyfunctional monocyte response to pathogen-associated molecular patterns (PAMPs) that is distinct from adult blood cells NKG2C+CD57+ natural killer with senescent features cells are induced in cutaneous leishmaniasis and accumulate in patients with lesional healing impairment
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1