国内民学研究与发展中心

IF 0.4 Q3 LAW Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review Pub Date : 2022-05-05 DOI:10.24031/1992-2043-2022-22-1-30-44

E. Sukhanov

{"title":"国内民学研究与发展中心","authors":"E. Sukhanov","doi":"10.24031/1992-2043-2022-22-1-30-44","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The main results of the 30-year work of the Private Law Research Centre and the main directions of the forthcoming scientific work are highlighted. The negative features of the concept of economic analysis of law, which are proposed to be gradually replaced by legal analysis of the economy, as well as the negative aspects of excessive enthusiasm for the legal registration of business relations and borrowing foreign experience in legal development, are noted. The necessity of developing a general theory of civil law is proved, and the groundlessness of the search and reinforcement of theoretical structures directly in law enforcement (judicial) practice is pointed out.","PeriodicalId":35992,"journal":{"name":"Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review","volume":"26 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"THE RESEARCH CENTRE AND DEVELOPMENT OF DOMESTIC CIVIL STUDIES\",\"authors\":\"E. Sukhanov\",\"doi\":\"10.24031/1992-2043-2022-22-1-30-44\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The main results of the 30-year work of the Private Law Research Centre and the main directions of the forthcoming scientific work are highlighted. The negative features of the concept of economic analysis of law, which are proposed to be gradually replaced by legal analysis of the economy, as well as the negative aspects of excessive enthusiasm for the legal registration of business relations and borrowing foreign experience in legal development, are noted. The necessity of developing a general theory of civil law is proved, and the groundlessness of the search and reinforcement of theoretical structures directly in law enforcement (judicial) practice is pointed out.\",\"PeriodicalId\":35992,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review\",\"volume\":\"26 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24031/1992-2043-2022-22-1-30-44\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24031/1992-2043-2022-22-1-30-44","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

重点介绍了私法研究中心30年来工作的主要成果和今后科学工作的主要方向。指出了法律的经济分析概念的消极特征，即被经济的法律分析逐渐取代，以及过度热衷于商业关系的法律登记和在法律发展中借鉴外国经验的消极方面。论证了发展民法通论的必要性，指出了直接在执法(司法)实践中寻找和强化理论结构的缺乏根据。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

THE RESEARCH CENTRE AND DEVELOPMENT OF DOMESTIC CIVIL STUDIES

The main results of the 30-year work of the Private Law Research Centre and the main directions of the forthcoming scientific work are highlighted. The negative features of the concept of economic analysis of law, which are proposed to be gradually replaced by legal analysis of the economy, as well as the negative aspects of excessive enthusiasm for the legal registration of business relations and borrowing foreign experience in legal development, are noted. The necessity of developing a general theory of civil law is proved, and the groundlessness of the search and reinforcement of theoretical structures directly in law enforcement (judicial) practice is pointed out.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review Social Sciences-Law

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： The Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review (CR-CL) is the nation’s leading progressive law journal. Founded in 1966 as an instrument to advance personal freedoms and human dignities, CR-CL seeks to catalyze progressive thought and dialogue through publishing innovative legal scholarship and from various perspectives and in diverse fields of study.