社会交易的一瞥-表现分析的信号提供者

delete Pub Date : 2019-05-01 DOI:10.2139/ssrn.3410534
Alexander Deneke
{"title":"社会交易的一瞥-表现分析的信号提供者","authors":"Alexander Deneke","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3410534","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study provides an overview of the characteristics of signal providers on social trading platforms, which are increasing in relevance supported by the fact that retail investors do not like to make investment decisions by themselves. Signal providers and receivers exist on the platform. We use a proprietary data set of one of the largest German social trading platforms. Signal providers are grouped to certain career levels, which represent a track record calculated with the help of certain performance and risk variables. Career level five represents the highest possible ranking. We show that signal providers in general neither outperform mutual funds nor the market. However, the motivation for signal receivers to go on social trading platforms should be the high transparency and simplicity to invest amongst others. Furthermore, the study's robustness check indicates that signal providers' investment strategies are not likely to be effected in times of high market volatility due to not investing in assets that are highly prone to market movements. This behaviour is shown by a factor analysis.","PeriodicalId":11044,"journal":{"name":"delete","volume":"8 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Social Trading at a Glance - A Performance Analysis of Signal Providers\",\"authors\":\"Alexander Deneke\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3410534\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study provides an overview of the characteristics of signal providers on social trading platforms, which are increasing in relevance supported by the fact that retail investors do not like to make investment decisions by themselves. Signal providers and receivers exist on the platform. We use a proprietary data set of one of the largest German social trading platforms. Signal providers are grouped to certain career levels, which represent a track record calculated with the help of certain performance and risk variables. Career level five represents the highest possible ranking. We show that signal providers in general neither outperform mutual funds nor the market. However, the motivation for signal receivers to go on social trading platforms should be the high transparency and simplicity to invest amongst others. Furthermore, the study's robustness check indicates that signal providers' investment strategies are not likely to be effected in times of high market volatility due to not investing in assets that are highly prone to market movements. This behaviour is shown by a factor analysis.\",\"PeriodicalId\":11044,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"delete\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-05-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"delete\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3410534\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"delete","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3410534","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究概述了社交交易平台上信号提供者的特征,这些特征与散户投资者不喜欢自己做出投资决策这一事实的相关性越来越强。平台上存在信号提供者和接收器。我们使用德国最大的社交交易平台之一的专有数据集。信号提供商被划分为特定的职业级别,这代表了在某些绩效和风险变量的帮助下计算的跟踪记录。职业级别5代表最高可能的排名。我们的研究表明,信号提供商总体上既不优于共同基金,也不优于市场。然而,信号接收者进入社交交易平台的动机应该是高透明度和简单的投资。此外,研究的稳健性检验表明,信号提供商的投资策略不太可能在高市场波动时期受到影响,因为他们不投资于高度容易受到市场波动影响的资产。因子分析显示了这种行为。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Social Trading at a Glance - A Performance Analysis of Signal Providers
This study provides an overview of the characteristics of signal providers on social trading platforms, which are increasing in relevance supported by the fact that retail investors do not like to make investment decisions by themselves. Signal providers and receivers exist on the platform. We use a proprietary data set of one of the largest German social trading platforms. Signal providers are grouped to certain career levels, which represent a track record calculated with the help of certain performance and risk variables. Career level five represents the highest possible ranking. We show that signal providers in general neither outperform mutual funds nor the market. However, the motivation for signal receivers to go on social trading platforms should be the high transparency and simplicity to invest amongst others. Furthermore, the study's robustness check indicates that signal providers' investment strategies are not likely to be effected in times of high market volatility due to not investing in assets that are highly prone to market movements. This behaviour is shown by a factor analysis.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Balanced Votes Method: A new perspective on symmetry in creating fair redistricting plans and measuring gerrymandering An in Vitro Study to Evaluate and Compare the Remineralizing Potential among Casein Phosphopeptide-Amorphous Calcium Phosphate (CPP-ACP) with Fluoride and Surface Pre-Reacted Glass (S-PRG) Fillers Using Quantitative Analysis. Sport Sponsorship Announcement and Stock Returns: A Meta-Analytic Review How Shifting from In-Person to Virtual-Only Shareholder Meetings Affects Shareholders’ Voice Did Everything Change After 911? Not Everything!
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1