18 ~ 35岁正常人头部倾斜大小对主观视觉垂直度(SVV)的影响研究

IF 0.3 Q4 AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY Hearing Balance and Communication Pub Date : 2022-03-13 DOI:10.1080/21695717.2022.2033947
Mahmoud Rezvani Amin, Hadi Behzad
{"title":"18 ~ 35岁正常人头部倾斜大小对主观视觉垂直度(SVV)的影响研究","authors":"Mahmoud Rezvani Amin, Hadi Behzad","doi":"10.1080/21695717.2022.2033947","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objective: The subjective visual vertical (SVV) is commonly considered as an indicator of the sense of orientation. The present study aims to assess the impact of head tilt size (by 0°, 15°, 30° and 45° to the left or to the right) on SVV among the normal individuals with ages ranged from 18 to 35 years. Methods: Four healthy participants (30 males and 17 females; mean ± SD age: 22.14 ± 3.463) were included in current study. SVV was measured using a forced-choice paradigm and was applied (in different head tilt positions) for every individual twice the time. In addition, difference in averages of SVV in zero and non-zero positions was compared. A p-value of .05 or below was considered to be statistically significant. Results: There is statistically significant different between head tilt size by 15° and without head tilt for averages of SVV responses (p ˂ .001). Averages of SVV responses were not different between the head tilt size by 30° and 45° and without head tilt (p > .05). In addition, there is statistically significant different between head tilt size by 15° to the left and to the right (p ˂ .001). This rate was not statistically significant between 30° to the left and to the right and 40° to the left and to the right (p > .05). Conclusion: Our results showed that head tilt size by 15° have an impact on the evaluation of the SVV. These findings must be taken into account in the growing body of research that uses the SVV paradigm in disease settings.","PeriodicalId":43765,"journal":{"name":"Hearing Balance and Communication","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The impact examination of the head tilt size on the subjective visual vertical (SVV) among the normal individuals with ages ranged from 18 to 35 years\",\"authors\":\"Mahmoud Rezvani Amin, Hadi Behzad\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21695717.2022.2033947\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Objective: The subjective visual vertical (SVV) is commonly considered as an indicator of the sense of orientation. The present study aims to assess the impact of head tilt size (by 0°, 15°, 30° and 45° to the left or to the right) on SVV among the normal individuals with ages ranged from 18 to 35 years. Methods: Four healthy participants (30 males and 17 females; mean ± SD age: 22.14 ± 3.463) were included in current study. SVV was measured using a forced-choice paradigm and was applied (in different head tilt positions) for every individual twice the time. In addition, difference in averages of SVV in zero and non-zero positions was compared. A p-value of .05 or below was considered to be statistically significant. Results: There is statistically significant different between head tilt size by 15° and without head tilt for averages of SVV responses (p ˂ .001). Averages of SVV responses were not different between the head tilt size by 30° and 45° and without head tilt (p > .05). In addition, there is statistically significant different between head tilt size by 15° to the left and to the right (p ˂ .001). This rate was not statistically significant between 30° to the left and to the right and 40° to the left and to the right (p > .05). Conclusion: Our results showed that head tilt size by 15° have an impact on the evaluation of the SVV. These findings must be taken into account in the growing body of research that uses the SVV paradigm in disease settings.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43765,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Hearing Balance and Communication\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Hearing Balance and Communication\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21695717.2022.2033947\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hearing Balance and Communication","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21695717.2022.2033947","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要目的:主观视觉垂直度(SVV)通常被认为是方向感的一个指标。本研究旨在评估头部倾斜大小(向左或向右倾斜0°,15°,30°和45°)对18至35岁正常人SVV的影响。方法:4名健康受试者(男性30名,女性17名;平均±SD年龄:22.14±3.463)。SVV使用强迫选择范式进行测量,并对每个人(在不同的头部倾斜位置)应用两次。此外,比较了零位置和非零位置SVV平均值的差异。p值小于等于0.05被认为具有统计学意义。结果:头部倾斜15°和不倾斜15°对SVV反应的平均值有统计学意义上的差异(p小于0.001)。头部倾斜30°和45°与不倾斜头部之间,SVV反应的平均值没有差异(p > 0.05)。此外,头部向左倾斜15°和向右倾斜15°之间存在统计学上的显著差异(p小于0.001)。在左右30°和左右40°之间,这一比率无统计学意义(p > 0.05)。结论:我们的研究结果表明,头部倾斜15°的大小对SVV的评估有影响。在疾病环境中使用SVV范式的越来越多的研究中,必须考虑到这些发现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The impact examination of the head tilt size on the subjective visual vertical (SVV) among the normal individuals with ages ranged from 18 to 35 years
Abstract Objective: The subjective visual vertical (SVV) is commonly considered as an indicator of the sense of orientation. The present study aims to assess the impact of head tilt size (by 0°, 15°, 30° and 45° to the left or to the right) on SVV among the normal individuals with ages ranged from 18 to 35 years. Methods: Four healthy participants (30 males and 17 females; mean ± SD age: 22.14 ± 3.463) were included in current study. SVV was measured using a forced-choice paradigm and was applied (in different head tilt positions) for every individual twice the time. In addition, difference in averages of SVV in zero and non-zero positions was compared. A p-value of .05 or below was considered to be statistically significant. Results: There is statistically significant different between head tilt size by 15° and without head tilt for averages of SVV responses (p ˂ .001). Averages of SVV responses were not different between the head tilt size by 30° and 45° and without head tilt (p > .05). In addition, there is statistically significant different between head tilt size by 15° to the left and to the right (p ˂ .001). This rate was not statistically significant between 30° to the left and to the right and 40° to the left and to the right (p > .05). Conclusion: Our results showed that head tilt size by 15° have an impact on the evaluation of the SVV. These findings must be taken into account in the growing body of research that uses the SVV paradigm in disease settings.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Hearing Balance and Communication
Hearing Balance and Communication AUDIOLOGY & SPEECH-LANGUAGE PATHOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
51
期刊最新文献
Comparison of quick speech-in-noise test and pure tone audiometry in noise-induced hearing loss Otolin-1 as a biomarker for the evaluation of the effectiveness of betahistine treatment for benign paroxysmal positional vertigo The effect of hearing loss on balance in subjects with cognitive disorders Effect of auditory deprivation on threshold of sound lateralization Assessment of spatial acuity in typically developing children: a comparative study of sound-field and closed-field sound source identification paradigms
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1