弗吉尼亚州K-12学校校园里的树木

J. Kirwan, P. Wiseman, J. Seiler
{"title":"弗吉尼亚州K-12学校校园里的树木","authors":"J. Kirwan, P. Wiseman, J. Seiler","doi":"10.25778/10.25778/9AQ6-CZ64","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Trees and saplings growing on K-12 school campuses were investigated in 105 school districts across Virginia. There were 2812 trees (>12.5 cm stem diameter at 1.4 m above ground level) inventoried across all campuses. The mean and median campus tree population was 27 and 18, respectively. Lob lolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) was the most abundant species, accounting for 11 % of all inventoried trees. Red maple (Acer rubrum L.) was the most frequently inventoried species, present on 44% of the campuses. Sapling (trees with 2.5-12.5 cm stem diameter at 1.4 m above ground level) populations were similar to tree populations. The mean and median campus sapling population was 23 and 13, respectively. Flowering dogwood (Cornus florid a L.) and red maple were the most abundant sapling species, each accounting for about 10% of all inventoried saplings. Flowering dogwood, red maple, Bradford pear (Pyrus calleryana Decne. 'Bradford'), willow oak (Quercus phellos L.), and ornamental cherry (Prunus spp.) were the most frequently inventoried sapling species, each present on more than 25% of the campuses. Across all campuses, species diversity was relatively low: less than 10 species accounted for over 50% of the inventoried trees and saplings. Prominent Virginia natives, in particular Carya and Quercus species, were under represented in the inventory. INTRODUCTION Urban forests are increasingly recognized for their ecological and societal benefits (Kane and Kirwan 2005). Trees in the urban forest improve air quality, protect watersheds, sequester carbon, and reduce energy consumption for heating and cooling buildings. In addition, properly designed and maintained urban vegetation has been linked to reduced crime (Kuo and Sullivan 2001), enhance cognitive development of children (Wells 2000), and job satisfaction (Kaplan et al. 1988). As the U.S. population grows and becomes more urbanized, urban forests will play an increasingly important role in environmental sustainability and quality of life. From 1910 to 2000, the urban segment of the U.S. population increased from 28% to 80% (Hobbs and Stoops 2002). By 2030, 87% of the U.S. population (projected to exceed 370 million) will live in urbanized areas (UNESA 2004) . The population of Virginia (currently about 7.5 million) is projected to reach 9.8 million by 2030 (U.S. Census Bureau 2005). In the Chesapeake Bay watershed alone, residential development is projected to consume 800,000 acres of land between 2003 and 2030 (Boesch and Greer 2003). This pattern and rate of population growth will place unprecedented strain on natural resources. Healthy, well-managed urban forests may be a key component of sustainable community growth. In 1998, the Virginia Tech Department of Forestry began an outreach program to teach dendrology, forest biology, and forest management concepts to K-12 students and Virginia Journal of Science, Vol. 58, No. 1, 2007 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/vjs/vol58/iss1 4 VIRGINIA JOURNAL OF SCIENCE other public audiences. The program was initiated to help address a nationwide decline in science achievement during the middle school years (Calsyn et al. 1999) and to help Virginia teachers meet their Standards of Learning (SOL) objectives (Board of Education 2003). The program has been delivered through a dedicated web site (http://www.cnr.vt.edu/dendro/forsite /contents.htm), classroom presentations by Virginia Tech undergraduate students, and internet-based scientific investigations conducted by K-12 students (Kirwan and Seiler 2005). Now in its eighth year, the outreach program has spanned across three states and reached nearly 15,000 K-12 students at 83 schools and numerous 4-H clubs. As part of the outreach program, tree inventories were conducted on school campuses. From these inventories, school tree lists were compiled and placed on the program website. Dendrology fact sheets and an online dichotomous key developed by the Virginia Tech Department of Forestry were linked to the tree lists to facilitate student learning about tree identification and forest biology. In compiling the tree lists, a wealth of information has emerged on the composition of campus tree populations. Trees are a valuable asset on school campuses. They not only provide important environmental benefits such as shade and storm water abatement, but are also a valuable, yet often overlooked, resource to teach students about ecology and stewardship. Perhaps more important, the composition of campus tree populations is arguably a reflection of local knowledge, attitudes, and values regarding trees on public property. In most localities, the same biological, sociopolitical, and economic forces that influence tree preservation and planting on school campuses similarly impact other public properties. For these reasons, campus tree inventories can provide insight into natural resource management and education efforts in Virginia. The purpose of this paper is to report key findings from these campus tree inventories and discuss the implications for future management and education efforts. MATERIALS AND METHODS From 2000 to 2005, the lead author, with assistance from local students, teachers, and extension agents, conducted tree inventories on K-12 school campuses across Virginia. Tree inventories were conducted at schools where outreach educational programs were conducted or where there was a request to compile a school tree list. To obtain a broad geographical representation, inventory data from only one school campus in each of 105 school districts were analyzed in this study (Appendix 1 ). In school districts where more than one campus was inventoried, the school that was first in alphabetical order was selected for this study. The majority of tree inventory data used in this study was collected at public elementary schools (91 of 105 campuses). The balance came from middle school (10), high school (1 ), or combined (2) campuses. One private elementary school campus was also inventoried. The inventories were limited to trees growing in maintained campus areas. Boundary line trees and trees in campus natural areas were not inventoried. The species and stem diameter at breast height (DBH-measured 1.4 m above ground level) were determined for each inventoried tree. For multi-stemmed trees that divided below 1.4 m, the individual stem diameters were summed. Trees :s:: 12.5 cm DBH were designated as saplings in the inventory. Trees <2.5 cm DBH were not inventoried. Species abundance, frequency, and importance metrics were calculated using the SCHOOL CAMPUS TREES 5 TABLE 1. Statistics describing tree (> 12.5 cm stem diameter at 1.4 m above ground level) and sapling (trees with 2.5-12.5 cm stem diameter at 1.4 m above ground level) populations inventoried on 105 Virginia school campuses during 2000-2005. Campus Plant Count Campus Species Richness Trees Minimum 0 0 25th Percentile 8 3 Median 18 6 Mean 27 7 75th Percentile 39 9 Maximum 162 23 Total 2812 100 Saplings Minimum 0 0 25th Percentile 6 3 Median 13 5 Mean 23 6 75th Percentile 25 8 Maximum 196 22 Total 2431 103 combined inventory data. Each metric was calculated separately for trees and saplings. Species abundance was calculated as the number of plants of a given species divided by the total number of plants in the inventory. Species frequency was calculated as the number of campuses where a species was inventoried divided by the total number of campuses inventoried. Abundance and frequency values were multiplied by 100 and expressed as percentages. Species importance was calculated as the sum of the abundance and frequency percentages. The importance metric was developed as a simple way to communicate both the preponderance and geographic distribution of a species. A high importance value does not necessarily imply that a species has high ecological or economic value. Rather, the importance metric reveals patterns in tree preservation and tree planting on school campuses that are not discernable from the abundance and frequency metrics alone. RESULTS Trees There were 2812 trees inventoried across the 105 school campuses (Table 1 ). The mean and median campus tree population was 27 and 18, respectively. Three campuses each had over 100 inventoried trees (Figure 1 ). Conversely, nine campuses had no inventoried trees . About one-fourth of the campuses had eight or fewer inventoried trees. There were 100 tree species, representing 52 genera, inventoried across the 105 school campuses. On average, there were seven different species on each campus. \\ Virginia Journal of Science, Vol. 58, No. 1, 2007 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/vjs/vol58/iss1 6 VIRGINIA JOURNAL OF SCIENCE","PeriodicalId":23516,"journal":{"name":"Virginia journal of science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2007-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Trees on K-12 School Campuses in Virginia\",\"authors\":\"J. Kirwan, P. Wiseman, J. Seiler\",\"doi\":\"10.25778/10.25778/9AQ6-CZ64\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Trees and saplings growing on K-12 school campuses were investigated in 105 school districts across Virginia. There were 2812 trees (>12.5 cm stem diameter at 1.4 m above ground level) inventoried across all campuses. The mean and median campus tree population was 27 and 18, respectively. Lob lolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) was the most abundant species, accounting for 11 % of all inventoried trees. Red maple (Acer rubrum L.) was the most frequently inventoried species, present on 44% of the campuses. Sapling (trees with 2.5-12.5 cm stem diameter at 1.4 m above ground level) populations were similar to tree populations. The mean and median campus sapling population was 23 and 13, respectively. Flowering dogwood (Cornus florid a L.) and red maple were the most abundant sapling species, each accounting for about 10% of all inventoried saplings. Flowering dogwood, red maple, Bradford pear (Pyrus calleryana Decne. 'Bradford'), willow oak (Quercus phellos L.), and ornamental cherry (Prunus spp.) were the most frequently inventoried sapling species, each present on more than 25% of the campuses. Across all campuses, species diversity was relatively low: less than 10 species accounted for over 50% of the inventoried trees and saplings. Prominent Virginia natives, in particular Carya and Quercus species, were under represented in the inventory. INTRODUCTION Urban forests are increasingly recognized for their ecological and societal benefits (Kane and Kirwan 2005). Trees in the urban forest improve air quality, protect watersheds, sequester carbon, and reduce energy consumption for heating and cooling buildings. In addition, properly designed and maintained urban vegetation has been linked to reduced crime (Kuo and Sullivan 2001), enhance cognitive development of children (Wells 2000), and job satisfaction (Kaplan et al. 1988). As the U.S. population grows and becomes more urbanized, urban forests will play an increasingly important role in environmental sustainability and quality of life. From 1910 to 2000, the urban segment of the U.S. population increased from 28% to 80% (Hobbs and Stoops 2002). By 2030, 87% of the U.S. population (projected to exceed 370 million) will live in urbanized areas (UNESA 2004) . The population of Virginia (currently about 7.5 million) is projected to reach 9.8 million by 2030 (U.S. Census Bureau 2005). In the Chesapeake Bay watershed alone, residential development is projected to consume 800,000 acres of land between 2003 and 2030 (Boesch and Greer 2003). This pattern and rate of population growth will place unprecedented strain on natural resources. Healthy, well-managed urban forests may be a key component of sustainable community growth. In 1998, the Virginia Tech Department of Forestry began an outreach program to teach dendrology, forest biology, and forest management concepts to K-12 students and Virginia Journal of Science, Vol. 58, No. 1, 2007 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/vjs/vol58/iss1 4 VIRGINIA JOURNAL OF SCIENCE other public audiences. The program was initiated to help address a nationwide decline in science achievement during the middle school years (Calsyn et al. 1999) and to help Virginia teachers meet their Standards of Learning (SOL) objectives (Board of Education 2003). The program has been delivered through a dedicated web site (http://www.cnr.vt.edu/dendro/forsite /contents.htm), classroom presentations by Virginia Tech undergraduate students, and internet-based scientific investigations conducted by K-12 students (Kirwan and Seiler 2005). Now in its eighth year, the outreach program has spanned across three states and reached nearly 15,000 K-12 students at 83 schools and numerous 4-H clubs. As part of the outreach program, tree inventories were conducted on school campuses. From these inventories, school tree lists were compiled and placed on the program website. Dendrology fact sheets and an online dichotomous key developed by the Virginia Tech Department of Forestry were linked to the tree lists to facilitate student learning about tree identification and forest biology. In compiling the tree lists, a wealth of information has emerged on the composition of campus tree populations. Trees are a valuable asset on school campuses. They not only provide important environmental benefits such as shade and storm water abatement, but are also a valuable, yet often overlooked, resource to teach students about ecology and stewardship. Perhaps more important, the composition of campus tree populations is arguably a reflection of local knowledge, attitudes, and values regarding trees on public property. In most localities, the same biological, sociopolitical, and economic forces that influence tree preservation and planting on school campuses similarly impact other public properties. For these reasons, campus tree inventories can provide insight into natural resource management and education efforts in Virginia. The purpose of this paper is to report key findings from these campus tree inventories and discuss the implications for future management and education efforts. MATERIALS AND METHODS From 2000 to 2005, the lead author, with assistance from local students, teachers, and extension agents, conducted tree inventories on K-12 school campuses across Virginia. Tree inventories were conducted at schools where outreach educational programs were conducted or where there was a request to compile a school tree list. To obtain a broad geographical representation, inventory data from only one school campus in each of 105 school districts were analyzed in this study (Appendix 1 ). In school districts where more than one campus was inventoried, the school that was first in alphabetical order was selected for this study. The majority of tree inventory data used in this study was collected at public elementary schools (91 of 105 campuses). The balance came from middle school (10), high school (1 ), or combined (2) campuses. One private elementary school campus was also inventoried. The inventories were limited to trees growing in maintained campus areas. Boundary line trees and trees in campus natural areas were not inventoried. The species and stem diameter at breast height (DBH-measured 1.4 m above ground level) were determined for each inventoried tree. For multi-stemmed trees that divided below 1.4 m, the individual stem diameters were summed. Trees :s:: 12.5 cm DBH were designated as saplings in the inventory. Trees <2.5 cm DBH were not inventoried. Species abundance, frequency, and importance metrics were calculated using the SCHOOL CAMPUS TREES 5 TABLE 1. Statistics describing tree (> 12.5 cm stem diameter at 1.4 m above ground level) and sapling (trees with 2.5-12.5 cm stem diameter at 1.4 m above ground level) populations inventoried on 105 Virginia school campuses during 2000-2005. Campus Plant Count Campus Species Richness Trees Minimum 0 0 25th Percentile 8 3 Median 18 6 Mean 27 7 75th Percentile 39 9 Maximum 162 23 Total 2812 100 Saplings Minimum 0 0 25th Percentile 6 3 Median 13 5 Mean 23 6 75th Percentile 25 8 Maximum 196 22 Total 2431 103 combined inventory data. Each metric was calculated separately for trees and saplings. Species abundance was calculated as the number of plants of a given species divided by the total number of plants in the inventory. Species frequency was calculated as the number of campuses where a species was inventoried divided by the total number of campuses inventoried. Abundance and frequency values were multiplied by 100 and expressed as percentages. Species importance was calculated as the sum of the abundance and frequency percentages. The importance metric was developed as a simple way to communicate both the preponderance and geographic distribution of a species. A high importance value does not necessarily imply that a species has high ecological or economic value. Rather, the importance metric reveals patterns in tree preservation and tree planting on school campuses that are not discernable from the abundance and frequency metrics alone. RESULTS Trees There were 2812 trees inventoried across the 105 school campuses (Table 1 ). The mean and median campus tree population was 27 and 18, respectively. Three campuses each had over 100 inventoried trees (Figure 1 ). Conversely, nine campuses had no inventoried trees . About one-fourth of the campuses had eight or fewer inventoried trees. There were 100 tree species, representing 52 genera, inventoried across the 105 school campuses. On average, there were seven different species on each campus. \\\\ Virginia Journal of Science, Vol. 58, No. 1, 2007 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/vjs/vol58/iss1 6 VIRGINIA JOURNAL OF SCIENCE\",\"PeriodicalId\":23516,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Virginia journal of science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2007-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Virginia journal of science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25778/10.25778/9AQ6-CZ64\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Virginia journal of science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25778/10.25778/9AQ6-CZ64","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在弗吉尼亚州105个学区对K-12学校校园里生长的树木和树苗进行了调查。各校区共有2812棵树(树干直径大于12.5 cm,高于地面1.4 m)。校园树的平均和中位数分别为27和18。高山松(Pinus taeda L.)是最丰富的树种,占所有调查树种的11%。红枫(Acer rubrum L.)是最常被发现的树种,占校园的44%。苗木(茎径2.5 ~ 12.5 cm,距地面1.4 m)种群与乔木种群相似。校园树苗的平均树龄为23株,中位数为13株。开花茱萸(Cornus florid a L.)和红枫是最丰富的树苗种类,各占树苗总数的10%左右。开花茱萸,红枫,布拉德福梨(Pyrus calleryana Decne)。'Bradford'),柳树(Quercus phellos L.)和观赏樱桃(Prunus spp.)是最常见的树苗物种,每种树苗在超过25%的校园中存在。在所有校园中,物种多样性相对较低,不到10种的树木和树苗占清查树木和树苗的50%以上。突出的弗吉尼亚本地物种,特别是山核桃和栎属物种,在清单中代表性不足。城市森林因其生态和社会效益而日益得到认可(Kane and Kirwan 2005)。城市森林中的树木改善了空气质量,保护了流域,隔离了碳,减少了建筑供暖和制冷的能源消耗。此外,适当设计和维护的城市植被与减少犯罪(Kuo and Sullivan 2001)、促进儿童认知发展(Wells 2000)和工作满意度(Kaplan et al. 1988)有关。随着美国人口的增长和城市化程度的提高,城市森林将在环境可持续性和生活质量方面发挥越来越重要的作用。从1910年到2000年,美国的城市人口从28%增加到80% (Hobbs and Stoops 2002)。到2030年,87%的美国人口(预计超过3.7亿)将生活在城市化地区(UNESA 2004)。弗吉尼亚州的人口(目前约为750万)预计到2030年将达到980万(美国人口普查局2005年)。仅在切萨皮克湾流域,住宅开发预计将在2003年至2030年间消耗80万英亩土地(Boesch和Greer 2003)。这种人口增长模式和速度将对自然资源造成前所未有的压力。健康、管理良好的城市森林可能是可持续社区增长的关键组成部分。1998年,弗吉尼亚理工大学林业系开始了一项扩展计划,向K-12学生和《弗吉尼亚科学杂志》(2007年第58卷第1期)https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/vjs/vol58/iss1教授树木学、森林生物学和森林管理概念。该计划的启动是为了帮助解决全国中学生科学成绩下降的问题(Calsyn et al. 1999),并帮助弗吉尼亚州的教师达到他们的学习标准(SOL)目标(教育委员会2003年)。该计划通过一个专门的网站(http://www.cnr.vt.edu/dendro/forsite /content .htm)、弗吉尼亚理工大学本科生的课堂演讲和K-12学生进行的基于互联网的科学调查来实施(Kirwan and Seiler 2005)。如今,这个拓展项目已经进入了第八个年头,横跨三个州,覆盖了83所学校和众多4-H俱乐部的近1.5万名K-12学生。作为推广计划的一部分,在学校校园进行了三次调查。根据这些清单,编制了学校树清单并将其放在项目网站上。由弗吉尼亚理工大学林业系开发的树木情况说明书和在线二分键与树木列表相连,以方便学生学习树木识别和森林生物学。在编制树木名单的过程中,我们获得了大量关于校园树木种群构成的信息。树木是校园里宝贵的资产。它们不仅提供了重要的环境效益,如遮阳和雨水减少,但也是一个宝贵的,但往往被忽视的资源,教导学生关于生态和管理。也许更重要的是,校园树木数量的构成反映了当地对公共财产树木的知识、态度和价值观。在大多数地区,影响校园树木保护和种植的生物、社会政治和经济力量同样影响着其他公共财产。由于这些原因,校园树木清单可以为弗吉尼亚的自然资源管理和教育工作提供洞察力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Trees on K-12 School Campuses in Virginia
Trees and saplings growing on K-12 school campuses were investigated in 105 school districts across Virginia. There were 2812 trees (>12.5 cm stem diameter at 1.4 m above ground level) inventoried across all campuses. The mean and median campus tree population was 27 and 18, respectively. Lob lolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) was the most abundant species, accounting for 11 % of all inventoried trees. Red maple (Acer rubrum L.) was the most frequently inventoried species, present on 44% of the campuses. Sapling (trees with 2.5-12.5 cm stem diameter at 1.4 m above ground level) populations were similar to tree populations. The mean and median campus sapling population was 23 and 13, respectively. Flowering dogwood (Cornus florid a L.) and red maple were the most abundant sapling species, each accounting for about 10% of all inventoried saplings. Flowering dogwood, red maple, Bradford pear (Pyrus calleryana Decne. 'Bradford'), willow oak (Quercus phellos L.), and ornamental cherry (Prunus spp.) were the most frequently inventoried sapling species, each present on more than 25% of the campuses. Across all campuses, species diversity was relatively low: less than 10 species accounted for over 50% of the inventoried trees and saplings. Prominent Virginia natives, in particular Carya and Quercus species, were under represented in the inventory. INTRODUCTION Urban forests are increasingly recognized for their ecological and societal benefits (Kane and Kirwan 2005). Trees in the urban forest improve air quality, protect watersheds, sequester carbon, and reduce energy consumption for heating and cooling buildings. In addition, properly designed and maintained urban vegetation has been linked to reduced crime (Kuo and Sullivan 2001), enhance cognitive development of children (Wells 2000), and job satisfaction (Kaplan et al. 1988). As the U.S. population grows and becomes more urbanized, urban forests will play an increasingly important role in environmental sustainability and quality of life. From 1910 to 2000, the urban segment of the U.S. population increased from 28% to 80% (Hobbs and Stoops 2002). By 2030, 87% of the U.S. population (projected to exceed 370 million) will live in urbanized areas (UNESA 2004) . The population of Virginia (currently about 7.5 million) is projected to reach 9.8 million by 2030 (U.S. Census Bureau 2005). In the Chesapeake Bay watershed alone, residential development is projected to consume 800,000 acres of land between 2003 and 2030 (Boesch and Greer 2003). This pattern and rate of population growth will place unprecedented strain on natural resources. Healthy, well-managed urban forests may be a key component of sustainable community growth. In 1998, the Virginia Tech Department of Forestry began an outreach program to teach dendrology, forest biology, and forest management concepts to K-12 students and Virginia Journal of Science, Vol. 58, No. 1, 2007 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/vjs/vol58/iss1 4 VIRGINIA JOURNAL OF SCIENCE other public audiences. The program was initiated to help address a nationwide decline in science achievement during the middle school years (Calsyn et al. 1999) and to help Virginia teachers meet their Standards of Learning (SOL) objectives (Board of Education 2003). The program has been delivered through a dedicated web site (http://www.cnr.vt.edu/dendro/forsite /contents.htm), classroom presentations by Virginia Tech undergraduate students, and internet-based scientific investigations conducted by K-12 students (Kirwan and Seiler 2005). Now in its eighth year, the outreach program has spanned across three states and reached nearly 15,000 K-12 students at 83 schools and numerous 4-H clubs. As part of the outreach program, tree inventories were conducted on school campuses. From these inventories, school tree lists were compiled and placed on the program website. Dendrology fact sheets and an online dichotomous key developed by the Virginia Tech Department of Forestry were linked to the tree lists to facilitate student learning about tree identification and forest biology. In compiling the tree lists, a wealth of information has emerged on the composition of campus tree populations. Trees are a valuable asset on school campuses. They not only provide important environmental benefits such as shade and storm water abatement, but are also a valuable, yet often overlooked, resource to teach students about ecology and stewardship. Perhaps more important, the composition of campus tree populations is arguably a reflection of local knowledge, attitudes, and values regarding trees on public property. In most localities, the same biological, sociopolitical, and economic forces that influence tree preservation and planting on school campuses similarly impact other public properties. For these reasons, campus tree inventories can provide insight into natural resource management and education efforts in Virginia. The purpose of this paper is to report key findings from these campus tree inventories and discuss the implications for future management and education efforts. MATERIALS AND METHODS From 2000 to 2005, the lead author, with assistance from local students, teachers, and extension agents, conducted tree inventories on K-12 school campuses across Virginia. Tree inventories were conducted at schools where outreach educational programs were conducted or where there was a request to compile a school tree list. To obtain a broad geographical representation, inventory data from only one school campus in each of 105 school districts were analyzed in this study (Appendix 1 ). In school districts where more than one campus was inventoried, the school that was first in alphabetical order was selected for this study. The majority of tree inventory data used in this study was collected at public elementary schools (91 of 105 campuses). The balance came from middle school (10), high school (1 ), or combined (2) campuses. One private elementary school campus was also inventoried. The inventories were limited to trees growing in maintained campus areas. Boundary line trees and trees in campus natural areas were not inventoried. The species and stem diameter at breast height (DBH-measured 1.4 m above ground level) were determined for each inventoried tree. For multi-stemmed trees that divided below 1.4 m, the individual stem diameters were summed. Trees :s:: 12.5 cm DBH were designated as saplings in the inventory. Trees <2.5 cm DBH were not inventoried. Species abundance, frequency, and importance metrics were calculated using the SCHOOL CAMPUS TREES 5 TABLE 1. Statistics describing tree (> 12.5 cm stem diameter at 1.4 m above ground level) and sapling (trees with 2.5-12.5 cm stem diameter at 1.4 m above ground level) populations inventoried on 105 Virginia school campuses during 2000-2005. Campus Plant Count Campus Species Richness Trees Minimum 0 0 25th Percentile 8 3 Median 18 6 Mean 27 7 75th Percentile 39 9 Maximum 162 23 Total 2812 100 Saplings Minimum 0 0 25th Percentile 6 3 Median 13 5 Mean 23 6 75th Percentile 25 8 Maximum 196 22 Total 2431 103 combined inventory data. Each metric was calculated separately for trees and saplings. Species abundance was calculated as the number of plants of a given species divided by the total number of plants in the inventory. Species frequency was calculated as the number of campuses where a species was inventoried divided by the total number of campuses inventoried. Abundance and frequency values were multiplied by 100 and expressed as percentages. Species importance was calculated as the sum of the abundance and frequency percentages. The importance metric was developed as a simple way to communicate both the preponderance and geographic distribution of a species. A high importance value does not necessarily imply that a species has high ecological or economic value. Rather, the importance metric reveals patterns in tree preservation and tree planting on school campuses that are not discernable from the abundance and frequency metrics alone. RESULTS Trees There were 2812 trees inventoried across the 105 school campuses (Table 1 ). The mean and median campus tree population was 27 and 18, respectively. Three campuses each had over 100 inventoried trees (Figure 1 ). Conversely, nine campuses had no inventoried trees . About one-fourth of the campuses had eight or fewer inventoried trees. There were 100 tree species, representing 52 genera, inventoried across the 105 school campuses. On average, there were seven different species on each campus. \ Virginia Journal of Science, Vol. 58, No. 1, 2007 https://digitalcommons.odu.edu/vjs/vol58/iss1 6 VIRGINIA JOURNAL OF SCIENCE
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Habitat Partitioning and Associated Morphological Differences Among Three Species of Catostomidae (Teleostei: Actinopterygii) in the South Fork Roanoke River, Virginia Estimated 2020 CO2 Emission Reductions in Virginia’s Transportation Sector from COVID-19 Identification of Planktothrix (Cyanobacteria) Blooms and Effects on the Aquatic Macroinvertebrate Community in the Non-Tidal Potomac River, USA A Survey on Securing Personally Identifiable Information on Smartphones Central Administration of Agouti-Related Peptide Increases Food Intake in Japanese Quail
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1