Q4 Arts and Humanities Images (Poland) Pub Date : 2021-12-15 DOI:10.14746/i.2021.39.02
Iwona Kolasińska-Pasterczyk
{"title":"Filmowe reprezentacje ostatniej wieczerzy jako locus theologicus (trzy wizje biblijnej sceny)","authors":"Iwona Kolasińska-Pasterczyk","doi":"10.14746/i.2021.39.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The cinematic scenes of the Last Supper were treated as a challenge to visual theology. As the Last Supper, which in the films about Jesus of Nazareth (and, of course, the gospels) is the culmination (and also a turning point as an event ending Jesus` earthly activity), it is possible to see the essence of the theological message of films referring to the gospel in its presentation. The scenes of the Last Supper from three films were subjected  to a comparative analysis, each of which is an individual director`s vision. These are The King of Kings (1961) by Nicholas Ray, The Passion of the Christ (2004) by Mel Gibson and The Thorn of God (2015) by Óscar Parra de Carrizosa. The selection criterion was the importance given in the films to the scenes of the Last Supper and their mutually diverse representations. It has been shown how the established new transmission of visual theology modifies the meanings determined by classical theology, basically not deviating from the framework set by it.","PeriodicalId":37086,"journal":{"name":"Images (Poland)","volume":"65 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Images (Poland)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14746/i.2021.39.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

《最后的晚餐》的电影场景被视为对视觉神学的挑战。在关于拿撒勒人耶稣(当然,还有福音书)的电影中,最后的晚餐是高潮(也是结束耶稣尘世活动的转折点),因此我们可以看到电影中神学信息的本质是指福音的呈现。对三部电影中的《最后的晚餐》场景进行了对比分析,每一部都是导演的个人视角。分别是尼古拉斯·雷的《万王之王》(1961)、梅尔·吉布森的《耶稣受难传》(2004)和Óscar帕拉·德·卡里佐萨的《上帝之刺》(2015)。评选标准是电影中对《最后的晚餐》场景的重视程度及其相互差异的表现形式。已经确立的视觉神学新传播是如何修改经典神学所确定的意义的,基本上没有偏离经典神学所设定的框架。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Filmowe reprezentacje ostatniej wieczerzy jako locus theologicus (trzy wizje biblijnej sceny)
The cinematic scenes of the Last Supper were treated as a challenge to visual theology. As the Last Supper, which in the films about Jesus of Nazareth (and, of course, the gospels) is the culmination (and also a turning point as an event ending Jesus` earthly activity), it is possible to see the essence of the theological message of films referring to the gospel in its presentation. The scenes of the Last Supper from three films were subjected  to a comparative analysis, each of which is an individual director`s vision. These are The King of Kings (1961) by Nicholas Ray, The Passion of the Christ (2004) by Mel Gibson and The Thorn of God (2015) by Óscar Parra de Carrizosa. The selection criterion was the importance given in the films to the scenes of the Last Supper and their mutually diverse representations. It has been shown how the established new transmission of visual theology modifies the meanings determined by classical theology, basically not deviating from the framework set by it.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Images (Poland)
Images (Poland) Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Queerowanie gier AAA na przykładzie serii Assassin’s Creed – możliwości i zagrożenia Grofilia. Omówienie zjawiska na przykładzie wybranych seriali platformy Netflix Rola regulacji prawnych w kształtowaniu treści gier i mechanizmów ich promocji na przykładzie wybranych zagadnień ochrony konsumentów Postklasyczna groza. Przeobrażenia fuzji gatunkowej survival horroru Otwarty świat i narracja rozproszona w grze Elden Ring studia FromSoftware
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1