PG40将模拟教学建立为基础教学计划,以加强学习和培养临床教师

Tobias Chanin, Amit Dawar, J. Fanning
{"title":"PG40将模拟教学建立为基础教学计划,以加强学习和培养临床教师","authors":"Tobias Chanin, Amit Dawar, J. Fanning","doi":"10.1136/BMJSTEL-2020-ASPIHCONF.88","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The delivery of teaching to foundation doctors (FDs) is most often by didactic lectures, delivered by consultants as subject matter experts. This is effective for information delivery but can struggle to engage FDs and does not always allow for interaction and detailed discussion. We aimed to challenge this model by using peer-to-peer teaching and feedback as a primary method of content delivery. Summary of Work Simulation based education for FDs takes place once a month. We engaged our year 2 FDs to design simulation scenarios based on real or synthesised cases. For this they had to set learning objectives, design an appropriate scenario, ensure any equipment needed was available and finally deliver the scenario. They would then put together a presentation on the main learning outcome and deliver this after the debrief. FDs were asked to develop their scenarios and email them to a facilitator prior to the teaching. They were then given feedback on these scenarios and adapted them accordingly. The 17/18 programme was evaluated by collecting a pre and post questionnaire from the FDs. Summary of results 12 simulation sessions were delivered over the year. 12 FDs completed the pre-programme questionnaire and 11 completed the post. When asked ‘How useful is simulation in developing you as an educator’ the FDs scored an average of 6.0 (range 2–9) on the pre and 8.2/10 (range 6–10) on the post-questionnaire. FDs answered ‘How useful has Sim been in developing understanding of learning styles and the educational needs of others´ with an average of 5.3 prior to the programme and 8.4/10 after. Aside from these obvious improvements, some FDs developed novel teaching session e.g. Running a public health, tabletop simulation of a pandemic, that showed even more creativity in teaching. Discussion and Conclusions We have demonstrated that it is possible to run an effective simulation-based teaching programme that allows peer-to-peer teaching and debriefing. We have shown that allowing these scenarios to be designed and delivered by FDs can improve engagement in teaching and assist in developing them as future educators.","PeriodicalId":44757,"journal":{"name":"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PG40 Building simulation into a foundation teaching programme to enhance learning and develop the clinical teacher\",\"authors\":\"Tobias Chanin, Amit Dawar, J. Fanning\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/BMJSTEL-2020-ASPIHCONF.88\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background The delivery of teaching to foundation doctors (FDs) is most often by didactic lectures, delivered by consultants as subject matter experts. This is effective for information delivery but can struggle to engage FDs and does not always allow for interaction and detailed discussion. We aimed to challenge this model by using peer-to-peer teaching and feedback as a primary method of content delivery. Summary of Work Simulation based education for FDs takes place once a month. We engaged our year 2 FDs to design simulation scenarios based on real or synthesised cases. For this they had to set learning objectives, design an appropriate scenario, ensure any equipment needed was available and finally deliver the scenario. They would then put together a presentation on the main learning outcome and deliver this after the debrief. FDs were asked to develop their scenarios and email them to a facilitator prior to the teaching. They were then given feedback on these scenarios and adapted them accordingly. The 17/18 programme was evaluated by collecting a pre and post questionnaire from the FDs. Summary of results 12 simulation sessions were delivered over the year. 12 FDs completed the pre-programme questionnaire and 11 completed the post. When asked ‘How useful is simulation in developing you as an educator’ the FDs scored an average of 6.0 (range 2–9) on the pre and 8.2/10 (range 6–10) on the post-questionnaire. FDs answered ‘How useful has Sim been in developing understanding of learning styles and the educational needs of others´ with an average of 5.3 prior to the programme and 8.4/10 after. Aside from these obvious improvements, some FDs developed novel teaching session e.g. Running a public health, tabletop simulation of a pandemic, that showed even more creativity in teaching. Discussion and Conclusions We have demonstrated that it is possible to run an effective simulation-based teaching programme that allows peer-to-peer teaching and debriefing. We have shown that allowing these scenarios to be designed and delivered by FDs can improve engagement in teaching and assist in developing them as future educators.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44757,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJSTEL-2020-ASPIHCONF.88\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/BMJSTEL-2020-ASPIHCONF.88","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:对基础医生(FDs)的教学通常是由作为学科专家的顾问进行说教式讲座。这对于信息传递是有效的,但可能难以吸引fd,并且不总是允许交互和详细讨论。我们的目标是通过使用点对点教学和反馈作为内容传递的主要方法来挑战这种模式。以工作模拟为基础的培训总结每月进行一次。我们让二年级的学生根据真实或合成的案例设计模拟场景。为此,他们必须设定学习目标,设计适当的场景,确保所需的任何设备都可用,并最终交付场景。然后,他们会就主要的学习成果整理一份报告,并在汇报后发表。在教学之前,fd被要求开发他们的场景,并通过电子邮件将其发送给辅导员。然后,他们得到了关于这些场景的反馈,并相应地进行了调整。17/18计划是通过从fd收集前后问卷来评估的。成果总结全年共举办了12次模拟会议。12名fd完成了方案前调查表,11名完成了该职位。当被问及“模拟对培养你成为一名教育者有多大帮助”时,FDs在问卷前的平均得分为6.0(范围2-9),在问卷后的平均得分为8.2/10(范围6-10)。在回答“Sim在培养对他人学习风格和教育需求的理解方面有多有用”时,参与课程前的平均得分为5.3分,参与课程后的平均得分为8.4分(10分)。除了这些明显的改进之外,一些fd开发了新的教学课程,例如运行公共卫生,桌面模拟大流行,这在教学中显示出更多的创造力。讨论和结论我们已经证明,运行一个有效的基于模拟的教学程序是可能的,它允许对等教学和汇报。我们已经证明,允许fd设计和提供这些场景可以提高教学参与度,并帮助他们成为未来的教育者。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
PG40 Building simulation into a foundation teaching programme to enhance learning and develop the clinical teacher
Background The delivery of teaching to foundation doctors (FDs) is most often by didactic lectures, delivered by consultants as subject matter experts. This is effective for information delivery but can struggle to engage FDs and does not always allow for interaction and detailed discussion. We aimed to challenge this model by using peer-to-peer teaching and feedback as a primary method of content delivery. Summary of Work Simulation based education for FDs takes place once a month. We engaged our year 2 FDs to design simulation scenarios based on real or synthesised cases. For this they had to set learning objectives, design an appropriate scenario, ensure any equipment needed was available and finally deliver the scenario. They would then put together a presentation on the main learning outcome and deliver this after the debrief. FDs were asked to develop their scenarios and email them to a facilitator prior to the teaching. They were then given feedback on these scenarios and adapted them accordingly. The 17/18 programme was evaluated by collecting a pre and post questionnaire from the FDs. Summary of results 12 simulation sessions were delivered over the year. 12 FDs completed the pre-programme questionnaire and 11 completed the post. When asked ‘How useful is simulation in developing you as an educator’ the FDs scored an average of 6.0 (range 2–9) on the pre and 8.2/10 (range 6–10) on the post-questionnaire. FDs answered ‘How useful has Sim been in developing understanding of learning styles and the educational needs of others´ with an average of 5.3 prior to the programme and 8.4/10 after. Aside from these obvious improvements, some FDs developed novel teaching session e.g. Running a public health, tabletop simulation of a pandemic, that showed even more creativity in teaching. Discussion and Conclusions We have demonstrated that it is possible to run an effective simulation-based teaching programme that allows peer-to-peer teaching and debriefing. We have shown that allowing these scenarios to be designed and delivered by FDs can improve engagement in teaching and assist in developing them as future educators.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning
BMJ Simulation & Technology Enhanced Learning HEALTH CARE SCIENCES & SERVICES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Influence of Simulation-based Training on Reflective Practice. Virtual tabletop simulations for primary care pandemic preparedness and response. Developing a simulation programme to train airway management during the COVID-19 pandemic in a tertiary-level hospital. Interprofessional teamwork for managing medical deterioration in pregnancy: what contributes to good clinical performance in simulated practice? Age suit simulation replicates in healthy young adults the functional challenges to balance experienced by older adults: an observational study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1