{"title":"波托马克河河口“可溶性”铁的去除:一个答复","authors":"A. Eaton","doi":"10.1016/S0302-3524(80)80011-9","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Sholkovitz (1980) states that the observations of Eaton (1979) on freshwater removal of soluble Fe in the Potomac River actually represent cation coagulation at very low salinities. It is shown here that the salinity does not change over the region of Fe removal and thus the original hypotheses of Eaton (1979) are a better explanation in this case.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100492,"journal":{"name":"Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science","volume":"11 5","pages":"Pages 589-591"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1980-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0302-3524(80)80011-9","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Removal of ‘soluble’ iron in the Potomac River estuary: A reply\",\"authors\":\"A. Eaton\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S0302-3524(80)80011-9\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Sholkovitz (1980) states that the observations of Eaton (1979) on freshwater removal of soluble Fe in the Potomac River actually represent cation coagulation at very low salinities. It is shown here that the salinity does not change over the region of Fe removal and thus the original hypotheses of Eaton (1979) are a better explanation in this case.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100492,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science\",\"volume\":\"11 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 589-591\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1980-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S0302-3524(80)80011-9\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0302352480800119\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Estuarine and Coastal Marine Science","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0302352480800119","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Removal of ‘soluble’ iron in the Potomac River estuary: A reply
Sholkovitz (1980) states that the observations of Eaton (1979) on freshwater removal of soluble Fe in the Potomac River actually represent cation coagulation at very low salinities. It is shown here that the salinity does not change over the region of Fe removal and thus the original hypotheses of Eaton (1979) are a better explanation in this case.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
