对比甾体醌与0.9%氯化钠输注治疗糖尿病酮症酸中毒:一项初步研究

IF 0.1 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Medicine and Health Pub Date : 2017-12-22 DOI:10.17576/MH.2017.1202.03
H. Rossman, Mahathar Aw, N. Muhamad
{"title":"对比甾体醌与0.9%氯化钠输注治疗糖尿病酮症酸中毒:一项初步研究","authors":"H. Rossman, Mahathar Aw, N. Muhamad","doi":"10.17576/MH.2017.1202.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fluid replacement is the mainstay treatment for diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). Currently, the best choice of fluids is still debatable. An amount of 0.9% sodium chloride is commonly used. Sterofundin® is an alternative crystalloid that is assumed to expedite resolution of acidosis. Advantages in sterofundin content being smaller significant ion difference (SID) to plasma and lower chloride content. The main objective of the study was to compare rate of acidosis resolution in DKA patients between treatment with 0.9% normal saline and Sterofundin over 12 hrs. Other objectives were to compare significant ion difference (SID), 12-hr blood ketone clearance and electrolyte balance between the two groups. The study was a prospective open labelled randomized control trial. This study was conducted over 6 months. Sample size of 18 was obtained with 9 for each arm. Main difference between two groups was initial median 2-hr pH level improvement (NS = +0.006 vs. Sterofundin = +0.05, P=0.063), however not being significant. Ketone, anion gap reduction, bicarbonate normalisation, sodium, chloride, urea and creatinine levels failed to show any significant differences between both groups. Twelve-hour median chloride levels increments were higher in the NS group (+11) compared to the sterofundin group (+6). There was no difference between mortality and morbidity. Comparing the two fluid groups, there was no significant biochemical differences during treatment of DKA. This was a pilot study that can initiate further clinical trials.","PeriodicalId":53946,"journal":{"name":"Medicine and Health","volume":"11 1","pages":"179-192"},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2017-12-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparing sterofundin to 0.9% sodium chloride infusion in managing diabetic ketoacidosis: a pilot study\",\"authors\":\"H. Rossman, Mahathar Aw, N. Muhamad\",\"doi\":\"10.17576/MH.2017.1202.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Fluid replacement is the mainstay treatment for diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). Currently, the best choice of fluids is still debatable. An amount of 0.9% sodium chloride is commonly used. Sterofundin® is an alternative crystalloid that is assumed to expedite resolution of acidosis. Advantages in sterofundin content being smaller significant ion difference (SID) to plasma and lower chloride content. The main objective of the study was to compare rate of acidosis resolution in DKA patients between treatment with 0.9% normal saline and Sterofundin over 12 hrs. Other objectives were to compare significant ion difference (SID), 12-hr blood ketone clearance and electrolyte balance between the two groups. The study was a prospective open labelled randomized control trial. This study was conducted over 6 months. Sample size of 18 was obtained with 9 for each arm. Main difference between two groups was initial median 2-hr pH level improvement (NS = +0.006 vs. Sterofundin = +0.05, P=0.063), however not being significant. Ketone, anion gap reduction, bicarbonate normalisation, sodium, chloride, urea and creatinine levels failed to show any significant differences between both groups. Twelve-hour median chloride levels increments were higher in the NS group (+11) compared to the sterofundin group (+6). There was no difference between mortality and morbidity. Comparing the two fluid groups, there was no significant biochemical differences during treatment of DKA. This was a pilot study that can initiate further clinical trials.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53946,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medicine and Health\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"179-192\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-12-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medicine and Health\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17576/MH.2017.1202.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medicine and Health","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17576/MH.2017.1202.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

补液是糖尿病酮症酸中毒(DKA)的主要治疗方法。目前,液体的最佳选择仍有争议。通常使用0.9%的氯化钠。Sterofundin®是一种替代晶体,被认为可以加速酸中毒的解决。其优点是与血浆的显著离子差(SID)较小,氯离子含量较低。该研究的主要目的是比较0.9%生理盐水和甾体氟定治疗12小时内DKA患者酸中毒的缓解率。其他目的是比较两组之间的显著离子差异(SID)、12小时血酮清除率和电解质平衡。本研究为前瞻性开放标签随机对照试验。这项研究进行了6个月。样本量为18个,每组9个。两组之间的主要差异是初始中位2小时pH水平改善(NS = +0.006 vs Sterofundin = +0.05, P=0.063),但无显著性差异。酮、阴离子间隙减少、碳酸氢盐正常化、钠、氯化物、尿素和肌酐水平在两组之间没有显着差异。NS组12小时氯离子水平中位数增量(+11)高于甾体醌组(+6)。死亡率和发病率之间没有差异。两液体组比较,DKA治疗期间生化指标无显著差异。这是一项初步研究,可以启动进一步的临床试验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparing sterofundin to 0.9% sodium chloride infusion in managing diabetic ketoacidosis: a pilot study
Fluid replacement is the mainstay treatment for diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA). Currently, the best choice of fluids is still debatable. An amount of 0.9% sodium chloride is commonly used. Sterofundin® is an alternative crystalloid that is assumed to expedite resolution of acidosis. Advantages in sterofundin content being smaller significant ion difference (SID) to plasma and lower chloride content. The main objective of the study was to compare rate of acidosis resolution in DKA patients between treatment with 0.9% normal saline and Sterofundin over 12 hrs. Other objectives were to compare significant ion difference (SID), 12-hr blood ketone clearance and electrolyte balance between the two groups. The study was a prospective open labelled randomized control trial. This study was conducted over 6 months. Sample size of 18 was obtained with 9 for each arm. Main difference between two groups was initial median 2-hr pH level improvement (NS = +0.006 vs. Sterofundin = +0.05, P=0.063), however not being significant. Ketone, anion gap reduction, bicarbonate normalisation, sodium, chloride, urea and creatinine levels failed to show any significant differences between both groups. Twelve-hour median chloride levels increments were higher in the NS group (+11) compared to the sterofundin group (+6). There was no difference between mortality and morbidity. Comparing the two fluid groups, there was no significant biochemical differences during treatment of DKA. This was a pilot study that can initiate further clinical trials.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Medicine and Health
Medicine and Health MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
25th Medical & Health Research Week 2nd Malaysian Anatomical Association Education Symposium (MAAES) ST Elevation in Lead aVR with Malperfusion Syndrome: Sign of Severe Aortic Dissection The Chicago Lead Knowledge Test-Malay Version: A Cultural and Linguistic Adaptation for the Malaysian Population Venous Stasis Retinopathy Complicating a Case of Cavernous-carotid Fistula with an Initial Normal Computed Tomography Angiogram of the Brain
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1