产后两周多胎妇女和初产妇对产后助产支持评价的差异

RN, CM, BA (Psych), PhD Margaret Cooke (Senior researcher), RN CM MPH Tomasina Stacey
{"title":"产后两周多胎妇女和初产妇对产后助产支持评价的差异","authors":"RN, CM, BA (Psych), PhD Margaret Cooke (Senior researcher),&nbsp;RN CM MPH Tomasina Stacey","doi":"10.1016/S1448-8272(03)80012-3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The aim of this study was to describe the differences in midwifery support required by women having their first and subsequent babies in the first week after birth. The sample group was all women in a one-month period who gave birth in three urban hospitals in Sydney. The sample size was 365 with a 78% response rate at the two-week follow up. Self-report questionnaires were used to collect the data antenatally (28–36 weeks) and two weeks after birth. Analysis was simple descriptive statistics, t-tests and chi-square analyses were used where appropriate.</p><p>The results show a high proportion of primiparouswomen (85–100%) required the 17 items of postnatal support examined. Although experimenced mothers required less baby care support and less health suport than first time mothers, between 57–72% of experienced mothers reported that they required midwifery support when caring for their infants. At least one-fifth of women (regardless of parity) did not have their needs met for 13/17 of the items of postnatal support examined. A large proportion of all women (&gt;40%) did not have their health needs met. The only significant difference in the post-natal support provided to women was that first time mothers were less likely, tham multiparous women, to have their emotional needs met.</p><p>The sutdy demonstrated that midwifery supportduring the postnatal period needs to be improved for both primiparous and multiparous and multiparous women. The majority of multiparous women would like to have supoort from midwives related to baby care, physuical and emotiuonal health.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100149,"journal":{"name":"Australian Midwifery","volume":"16 3","pages":"Pages 18-24"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1448-8272(03)80012-3","citationCount":"42","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Differences in the evaluation of postnatal midwifery support by multiparous and primiparous women in the first two weeks after birth\",\"authors\":\"RN, CM, BA (Psych), PhD Margaret Cooke (Senior researcher),&nbsp;RN CM MPH Tomasina Stacey\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/S1448-8272(03)80012-3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The aim of this study was to describe the differences in midwifery support required by women having their first and subsequent babies in the first week after birth. The sample group was all women in a one-month period who gave birth in three urban hospitals in Sydney. The sample size was 365 with a 78% response rate at the two-week follow up. Self-report questionnaires were used to collect the data antenatally (28–36 weeks) and two weeks after birth. Analysis was simple descriptive statistics, t-tests and chi-square analyses were used where appropriate.</p><p>The results show a high proportion of primiparouswomen (85–100%) required the 17 items of postnatal support examined. Although experimenced mothers required less baby care support and less health suport than first time mothers, between 57–72% of experienced mothers reported that they required midwifery support when caring for their infants. At least one-fifth of women (regardless of parity) did not have their needs met for 13/17 of the items of postnatal support examined. A large proportion of all women (&gt;40%) did not have their health needs met. The only significant difference in the post-natal support provided to women was that first time mothers were less likely, tham multiparous women, to have their emotional needs met.</p><p>The sutdy demonstrated that midwifery supportduring the postnatal period needs to be improved for both primiparous and multiparous and multiparous women. The majority of multiparous women would like to have supoort from midwives related to baby care, physuical and emotiuonal health.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100149,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Midwifery\",\"volume\":\"16 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 18-24\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/S1448-8272(03)80012-3\",\"citationCount\":\"42\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Midwifery\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1448827203800123\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Midwifery","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1448827203800123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 42

摘要

本研究的目的是描述在分娩后第一周生育第一个孩子和第二个孩子的妇女在助产支持方面的差异。样本组是在一个月内在悉尼三家城市医院分娩的所有妇女。在为期两周的随访中,样本量为365人,回复率为78%。采用自我报告问卷收集产前(28-36周)和出生后两周的数据。分析采用简单的描述性统计,适当时使用t检验和卡方分析。结果显示,初产妇对17项产后支持的要求较高(85-100%)。虽然有经验的母亲需要的婴儿护理支持和健康支持比初次母亲少,但57%至72%有经验的母亲报告说,她们在照顾婴儿时需要助产支持。至少五分之一的妇女(不论胎次)在13/17的产后支助项目中没有得到满足。所有妇女中有很大一部分(40%)的保健需求没有得到满足。在为妇女提供的产后支持方面,唯一显著的区别是,与多次分娩的妇女相比,第一次分娩的母亲的情感需求得到满足的可能性更小。该研究表明,产后期间的助产支持需要改善,无论是初产和多产和多产妇女。大多数产多胎妇女希望得到助产士在婴儿护理、身体和心理健康方面的支持。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Differences in the evaluation of postnatal midwifery support by multiparous and primiparous women in the first two weeks after birth

The aim of this study was to describe the differences in midwifery support required by women having their first and subsequent babies in the first week after birth. The sample group was all women in a one-month period who gave birth in three urban hospitals in Sydney. The sample size was 365 with a 78% response rate at the two-week follow up. Self-report questionnaires were used to collect the data antenatally (28–36 weeks) and two weeks after birth. Analysis was simple descriptive statistics, t-tests and chi-square analyses were used where appropriate.

The results show a high proportion of primiparouswomen (85–100%) required the 17 items of postnatal support examined. Although experimenced mothers required less baby care support and less health suport than first time mothers, between 57–72% of experienced mothers reported that they required midwifery support when caring for their infants. At least one-fifth of women (regardless of parity) did not have their needs met for 13/17 of the items of postnatal support examined. A large proportion of all women (>40%) did not have their health needs met. The only significant difference in the post-natal support provided to women was that first time mothers were less likely, tham multiparous women, to have their emotional needs met.

The sutdy demonstrated that midwifery supportduring the postnatal period needs to be improved for both primiparous and multiparous and multiparous women. The majority of multiparous women would like to have supoort from midwives related to baby care, physuical and emotiuonal health.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Higher degree abstracts ‘Multidisciplinary collaboration’ and ‘team work’: misnomers for subjugation? The emotional impact on mothers and midwives of conflict between workplace and personal/professional ethics Australian college of midwifery journal to be reborn The experiences of a first cohort of Bachelor of Midwifery students, Victoria, Australia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1