慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者面对面和远程评估计时向上、行走和5次坐立试验的可重复性

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q3 RESPIRATORY SYSTEM COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Pub Date : 2022-04-06 DOI:10.1080/15412555.2022.2038119
Ismail Ozsoy, Muhammed İhsan Kodak, C. Karartı, Gulsah Ozsoy, A. Erturk, T. Kahraman
{"title":"慢性阻塞性肺疾病患者面对面和远程评估计时向上、行走和5次坐立试验的可重复性","authors":"Ismail Ozsoy, Muhammed İhsan Kodak, C. Karartı, Gulsah Ozsoy, A. Erturk, T. Kahraman","doi":"10.1080/15412555.2022.2038119","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Timed-Up and Go (TUG) and 5-Times Sit-to-Stand (5STS) are frequently used in clinical practice for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The aim of the study was to investigate the intra- and inter-rater reproducibility of the TUG and 5STS as both face-to-face and tele-assessment tests in patients with COPD. Forty-four patients with diagnosed COPD were included. Evaluations were carried out face-to-face and tele-assessment (synchronized and asynchronized). Inter-reliability between face-to-face and tele-assessment was excellent for TUG (ICC = 0.977) and 5STS (ICC = 0.970). Inter-reliability between two tele-raters was also excellent for TUG (ICC = 0.995) with the SEM = 0.04, SEM95% = 0.08, and SDC95% = 0.10 s, and 5STS (ICC = 0.990) with the SEM = 0.06, SEM95% = 0.12, and SDC95% = 0.18 s. Intra-rater reliability of the tele-assessment (synchronized) was excellent for TUG (ICC = 0.976) and 5STS (ICC = 0.964). The SEM, SEM95%, and SDC95% values were computed as 0.08, 0.16, and 0.22 s for TUG, and 0.11, 0.22, and 0.31 s for 5STS, respectively. The TUG and 5STS tests are reproducible tele-assessment measures in patients with COPD with excellent intra- and inter-rater reproducibility. The authors recommend these tests as practical assessment tools in patients with COPD at home for tele-health interventions. The reported SEM, SEM95%, and SDC95% values can be used as a minimum change that needs to be observed to be confident that the observed change is real and not, potentially, a product of measurement error.","PeriodicalId":10704,"journal":{"name":"COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","volume":"79 1","pages":"125 - 132"},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intra- and Inter-Rater Reproducibility of the Face-to-Face and Tele-Assessment of Timed-up and Go and 5-Times Sit-to-Stand Tests in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease\",\"authors\":\"Ismail Ozsoy, Muhammed İhsan Kodak, C. Karartı, Gulsah Ozsoy, A. Erturk, T. Kahraman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/15412555.2022.2038119\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Timed-Up and Go (TUG) and 5-Times Sit-to-Stand (5STS) are frequently used in clinical practice for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The aim of the study was to investigate the intra- and inter-rater reproducibility of the TUG and 5STS as both face-to-face and tele-assessment tests in patients with COPD. Forty-four patients with diagnosed COPD were included. Evaluations were carried out face-to-face and tele-assessment (synchronized and asynchronized). Inter-reliability between face-to-face and tele-assessment was excellent for TUG (ICC = 0.977) and 5STS (ICC = 0.970). Inter-reliability between two tele-raters was also excellent for TUG (ICC = 0.995) with the SEM = 0.04, SEM95% = 0.08, and SDC95% = 0.10 s, and 5STS (ICC = 0.990) with the SEM = 0.06, SEM95% = 0.12, and SDC95% = 0.18 s. Intra-rater reliability of the tele-assessment (synchronized) was excellent for TUG (ICC = 0.976) and 5STS (ICC = 0.964). The SEM, SEM95%, and SDC95% values were computed as 0.08, 0.16, and 0.22 s for TUG, and 0.11, 0.22, and 0.31 s for 5STS, respectively. The TUG and 5STS tests are reproducible tele-assessment measures in patients with COPD with excellent intra- and inter-rater reproducibility. The authors recommend these tests as practical assessment tools in patients with COPD at home for tele-health interventions. The reported SEM, SEM95%, and SDC95% values can be used as a minimum change that needs to be observed to be confident that the observed change is real and not, potentially, a product of measurement error.\",\"PeriodicalId\":10704,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease\",\"volume\":\"79 1\",\"pages\":\"125 - 132\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/15412555.2022.2038119\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/15412555.2022.2038119","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RESPIRATORY SYSTEM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在慢性阻塞性肺疾病(COPD)患者的临床实践中,经常使用计时起跳(TUG)和5次坐立(5STS)。该研究的目的是研究TUG和5STS作为COPD患者面对面和远程评估测试的内部和内部可重复性。44名诊断为慢性阻塞性肺病的患者被纳入研究。评估进行面对面和远程评估(同步和异步)。TUG量表(ICC = 0.977)和5STS量表(ICC = 0.970)面对面评估与远程评估的信度极好。对于TUG (ICC = 0.995) (SEM = 0.04, SEM95% = 0.08, SDC95% = 0.10 s)和5STS (ICC = 0.990) (SEM = 0.06, SEM95% = 0.12, SDC95% = 0.18 s),两个远程评分者之间的互信度也很好。TUG (ICC = 0.976)和5STS (ICC = 0.964)的远程评估(同步)信度极佳。TUG的SEM、SEM95%和SDC95%值分别为0.08、0.16和0.22 s, 5STS的SEM、SEM95%和SDC95%值分别为0.11、0.22和0.31 s。TUG和5STS试验是COPD患者可重复的远程评估方法,具有良好的组内和组间重复性。作者推荐这些测试作为家中COPD患者远程医疗干预的实用评估工具。报告的SEM、SEM95%和SDC95%值可以用作需要观察到的最小变化,以确信观察到的变化是真实的,而不是潜在的测量误差的产物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Intra- and Inter-Rater Reproducibility of the Face-to-Face and Tele-Assessment of Timed-up and Go and 5-Times Sit-to-Stand Tests in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease
Abstract Timed-Up and Go (TUG) and 5-Times Sit-to-Stand (5STS) are frequently used in clinical practice for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). The aim of the study was to investigate the intra- and inter-rater reproducibility of the TUG and 5STS as both face-to-face and tele-assessment tests in patients with COPD. Forty-four patients with diagnosed COPD were included. Evaluations were carried out face-to-face and tele-assessment (synchronized and asynchronized). Inter-reliability between face-to-face and tele-assessment was excellent for TUG (ICC = 0.977) and 5STS (ICC = 0.970). Inter-reliability between two tele-raters was also excellent for TUG (ICC = 0.995) with the SEM = 0.04, SEM95% = 0.08, and SDC95% = 0.10 s, and 5STS (ICC = 0.990) with the SEM = 0.06, SEM95% = 0.12, and SDC95% = 0.18 s. Intra-rater reliability of the tele-assessment (synchronized) was excellent for TUG (ICC = 0.976) and 5STS (ICC = 0.964). The SEM, SEM95%, and SDC95% values were computed as 0.08, 0.16, and 0.22 s for TUG, and 0.11, 0.22, and 0.31 s for 5STS, respectively. The TUG and 5STS tests are reproducible tele-assessment measures in patients with COPD with excellent intra- and inter-rater reproducibility. The authors recommend these tests as practical assessment tools in patients with COPD at home for tele-health interventions. The reported SEM, SEM95%, and SDC95% values can be used as a minimum change that needs to be observed to be confident that the observed change is real and not, potentially, a product of measurement error.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: From pathophysiology and cell biology to pharmacology and psychosocial impact, COPD: Journal Of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease publishes a wide range of original research, reviews, case studies, and conference proceedings to promote advances in the pathophysiology, diagnosis, management, and control of lung and airway disease and inflammation - providing a unique forum for the discussion, design, and evaluation of more efficient and effective strategies in patient care.
期刊最新文献
Granzyme B May Act as an Effector Molecule to Control the Inflammatory Process in COPD. Guidelines for the Pharmacologic Treatment of COPD 2023: Canada versus GOLD. The Role of Bioactive Small Molecules in COPD Pathogenesis. Assessment of the Relationship Between Genetic Determinants of Obesity, Unhealthy Eating Habits and Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Mendelian Randomisation Study. Beyond Spirometry: Linking Wasted Ventilation to Exertional Dyspnea in the Initial Stages of COPD.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1