基于复杂超声评估的子宫肌瘤和腺肌病淋巴结鉴别诊断的新可能性

M. Shalina, S. V. Nagorneva, M. Yarmolinskaya
{"title":"基于复杂超声评估的子宫肌瘤和腺肌病淋巴结鉴别诊断的新可能性","authors":"M. Shalina, S. V. Nagorneva, M. Yarmolinskaya","doi":"10.17816/jowd110878","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND: Ultrasound is widely used in routine practice to diagnose various forms of adenomyosis and uterine fibroids. However, due to the lack of unified criteria, hypo- or overdiagnosis of internal endometriosis is possible. Moreover, there are a number of difficulties in the differential diagnosis of nodular adenomyosis and uterine fibroids. \nAIM: The aim of this study was to develop a complex technique for the differential diagnosis of uterine fibroids and adenomyosis nodes. \nMATERIALS AND METHODS: We applied a complex ultrasound technique with a detailed and consistent application of the following tools 3D reconstruction, elastography, color Doppler, 3D power Doppler (glass body mode). The study was conducted in 124 patients of reproductive age with subsequent intraoperative and histological confirmation of the diagnosis. \nRESULTS: After the proposed ultrasound technique, uterine fibroids were diagnosed in 112 (90.3%) patients, of whom 85 (75.9%) patients had uterine fibroids combined with a diffuse form of internal endometriosis. Nodular adenomyosis was diagnosed in 12 (9.7%) patients. The additional examination and surgical treatment showed that the preliminary diagnosis of uterine fibroids was confirmed in 110 out of 112 women, and in two other cases, nodular adenomyosis was diagnosed. Eleven (91.7%) out of 12 patients were diagnosed correctly with nodular adenomyosis by the complex ultrasound examination, while in one case the preliminary diagnosis proved to be incorrect, with a conglomerate of three myomatous nodes detected as a result of surgical treatment. Thus, based on the technique we developed, the correct diagnosis was made in 121 (97.6%) patients. Misdiagnosis in three cases was associated with a history of a long-term medical treatment of adenomyosis and therefore Doppler and elastography results had lower sensitivity. \nCONCLUSIONS: The development of the described complex ultrasound technique allows for accurately diagnosing the form of adenomyosis, identifying early forms of the disease and differentiating adenomyosis nodes from myomatous nodes, which is necessary for the correct diagnosis, the right choice of the management tactics and the necessary treatment.","PeriodicalId":16623,"journal":{"name":"Journal of obstetrics and women's diseases","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New possibilities of differential diagnosis of uterine fibroids and adenomyosis nodes based on a complex ultrasound assessment\",\"authors\":\"M. Shalina, S. V. Nagorneva, M. Yarmolinskaya\",\"doi\":\"10.17816/jowd110878\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND: Ultrasound is widely used in routine practice to diagnose various forms of adenomyosis and uterine fibroids. However, due to the lack of unified criteria, hypo- or overdiagnosis of internal endometriosis is possible. Moreover, there are a number of difficulties in the differential diagnosis of nodular adenomyosis and uterine fibroids. \\nAIM: The aim of this study was to develop a complex technique for the differential diagnosis of uterine fibroids and adenomyosis nodes. \\nMATERIALS AND METHODS: We applied a complex ultrasound technique with a detailed and consistent application of the following tools 3D reconstruction, elastography, color Doppler, 3D power Doppler (glass body mode). The study was conducted in 124 patients of reproductive age with subsequent intraoperative and histological confirmation of the diagnosis. \\nRESULTS: After the proposed ultrasound technique, uterine fibroids were diagnosed in 112 (90.3%) patients, of whom 85 (75.9%) patients had uterine fibroids combined with a diffuse form of internal endometriosis. Nodular adenomyosis was diagnosed in 12 (9.7%) patients. The additional examination and surgical treatment showed that the preliminary diagnosis of uterine fibroids was confirmed in 110 out of 112 women, and in two other cases, nodular adenomyosis was diagnosed. Eleven (91.7%) out of 12 patients were diagnosed correctly with nodular adenomyosis by the complex ultrasound examination, while in one case the preliminary diagnosis proved to be incorrect, with a conglomerate of three myomatous nodes detected as a result of surgical treatment. Thus, based on the technique we developed, the correct diagnosis was made in 121 (97.6%) patients. Misdiagnosis in three cases was associated with a history of a long-term medical treatment of adenomyosis and therefore Doppler and elastography results had lower sensitivity. \\nCONCLUSIONS: The development of the described complex ultrasound technique allows for accurately diagnosing the form of adenomyosis, identifying early forms of the disease and differentiating adenomyosis nodes from myomatous nodes, which is necessary for the correct diagnosis, the right choice of the management tactics and the necessary treatment.\",\"PeriodicalId\":16623,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of obstetrics and women's diseases\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of obstetrics and women's diseases\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.17816/jowd110878\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of obstetrics and women's diseases","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.17816/jowd110878","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:超声在常规临床中广泛用于诊断各种形式的子宫腺肌病和子宫肌瘤。然而,由于缺乏统一的诊断标准,对子宫内膜异位症的低诊断或过度诊断是可能的。此外,在结节性子宫肌病和子宫肌瘤的鉴别诊断有许多困难。目的:本研究的目的是发展一种复杂的技术鉴别诊断子宫肌瘤和腺肌病淋巴结。材料和方法:我们应用了一种复杂的超声技术,详细和一致地应用了以下工具:3D重建、弹性成像、彩色多普勒、3D功率多普勒(玻璃体模式)。该研究在124例育龄患者中进行,随后术中和组织学证实了诊断。结果:采用超声技术后,112例(90.3%)患者诊断出子宫肌瘤,其中85例(75.9%)患者合并弥漫性子宫内膜异位症。结节性子宫肌病12例(9.7%)。进一步的检查和手术治疗显示,112例妇女中有110例被初步诊断为子宫肌瘤,另外2例被诊断为结节性子宫肌病。12例患者中11例(91.7%)通过复杂超声检查正确诊断结节性腺肌病,而1例初步诊断不正确,手术治疗后发现3个肌瘤结节。因此,基于我们开发的技术,121例(97.6%)患者做出了正确的诊断。三例误诊与长期治疗子宫腺肌病的病史有关,因此多普勒和弹性成像结果敏感性较低。结论:所述复杂超声技术的发展可以准确诊断子宫腺肌病的形态,识别疾病的早期形态,区分子宫腺肌病淋巴结与肌瘤淋巴结,这对于正确诊断、正确选择治疗策略和必要的治疗是必要的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
New possibilities of differential diagnosis of uterine fibroids and adenomyosis nodes based on a complex ultrasound assessment
BACKGROUND: Ultrasound is widely used in routine practice to diagnose various forms of adenomyosis and uterine fibroids. However, due to the lack of unified criteria, hypo- or overdiagnosis of internal endometriosis is possible. Moreover, there are a number of difficulties in the differential diagnosis of nodular adenomyosis and uterine fibroids. AIM: The aim of this study was to develop a complex technique for the differential diagnosis of uterine fibroids and adenomyosis nodes. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We applied a complex ultrasound technique with a detailed and consistent application of the following tools 3D reconstruction, elastography, color Doppler, 3D power Doppler (glass body mode). The study was conducted in 124 patients of reproductive age with subsequent intraoperative and histological confirmation of the diagnosis. RESULTS: After the proposed ultrasound technique, uterine fibroids were diagnosed in 112 (90.3%) patients, of whom 85 (75.9%) patients had uterine fibroids combined with a diffuse form of internal endometriosis. Nodular adenomyosis was diagnosed in 12 (9.7%) patients. The additional examination and surgical treatment showed that the preliminary diagnosis of uterine fibroids was confirmed in 110 out of 112 women, and in two other cases, nodular adenomyosis was diagnosed. Eleven (91.7%) out of 12 patients were diagnosed correctly with nodular adenomyosis by the complex ultrasound examination, while in one case the preliminary diagnosis proved to be incorrect, with a conglomerate of three myomatous nodes detected as a result of surgical treatment. Thus, based on the technique we developed, the correct diagnosis was made in 121 (97.6%) patients. Misdiagnosis in three cases was associated with a history of a long-term medical treatment of adenomyosis and therefore Doppler and elastography results had lower sensitivity. CONCLUSIONS: The development of the described complex ultrasound technique allows for accurately diagnosing the form of adenomyosis, identifying early forms of the disease and differentiating adenomyosis nodes from myomatous nodes, which is necessary for the correct diagnosis, the right choice of the management tactics and the necessary treatment.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of obstetrics and women's diseases
Journal of obstetrics and women's diseases Medicine-Obstetrics and Gynecology
CiteScore
0.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
53
期刊最新文献
The role of cervicovaginal microbiota in the occurrence of severe cervical intraepithelial dysplasia Evaluation of the effectiveness of innovative methods of focused ultrasound and uterine artery embolization in the treatment of uterine fibroids IGF1R rs907806 and GHSR rs572169 genetic variants in fetal macrosomia Assessment of endometrial and subendometrial three-dimensional power Doppler angiography evaluated by the VOCAL method in frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles on hormone replacement therapy Peculiarities of anesthesia for caesarean section in patients with gestational diabetes mellitus
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1