加州洛杉矶空气盆地12棵城市遮荫树的碳氢化合物排放

Stephanie B. Corchnoy , Janet Arey , Roger Atkinson
{"title":"加州洛杉矶空气盆地12棵城市遮荫树的碳氢化合物排放","authors":"Stephanie B. Corchnoy ,&nbsp;Janet Arey ,&nbsp;Roger Atkinson","doi":"10.1016/0957-1272(92)90009-H","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The large-scale planting of shade trees in urban areas to counteract heat-island effects and to minimize energy use is currently being discussed. Among the costs to be considered in a cost/benefit analysis of such a program is the potential for additional reactive organic compounds in the atmosphere due to emissions from these trees. In this program, 15 species of potential shade trees for the Los Angeles Air Basin were studied and emission rates were determined for 11 of these trees, with one further tree (Crape myrtle) exhibiting no detectable emissions. The emission rates normalized to dry leaf weight and corrected to 30°C were (in μg g<sup>−1</sup> h<sup>−1</sup>), ranked from lowest to highest emission rate: Crape myrtle, none detected; Camphor, 0.03; Aleppo pine, 0.15; Deodar cedar, 0.29; Italian Stone pine, 0.42; Monterey pine, 0.90; Brazilian pepper, 1.3; Canary Island pine, 1.7; Ginkgo, 3.0; California pepper, 3.7; Liquidambar, 37; Carrotwood, 49. In addition to the emission rates per unit biomass, the biomass per tree must be factored into any assessment of the relative merits of the various trees, since some trees have higher biomass constants than others. The present data shows that there are large differences in emission rates among different tree species and this should be factored into decision-making as to which shade trees to plant. Based solely on the presently determined emission rates, the Crape myrtle and Camphor tree are good choices for large-scale planting, while the Carrotwood tree and Liquidambar are poor choices due to their high isoprene emission rates.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100140,"journal":{"name":"Atmospheric Environment. Part B. Urban Atmosphere","volume":"26 3","pages":"Pages 339-348"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0957-1272(92)90009-H","citationCount":"72","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Hydrocarbon emissions from twelve urban shade trees of the Los Angeles, California, Air Basin\",\"authors\":\"Stephanie B. Corchnoy ,&nbsp;Janet Arey ,&nbsp;Roger Atkinson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0957-1272(92)90009-H\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The large-scale planting of shade trees in urban areas to counteract heat-island effects and to minimize energy use is currently being discussed. Among the costs to be considered in a cost/benefit analysis of such a program is the potential for additional reactive organic compounds in the atmosphere due to emissions from these trees. In this program, 15 species of potential shade trees for the Los Angeles Air Basin were studied and emission rates were determined for 11 of these trees, with one further tree (Crape myrtle) exhibiting no detectable emissions. The emission rates normalized to dry leaf weight and corrected to 30°C were (in μg g<sup>−1</sup> h<sup>−1</sup>), ranked from lowest to highest emission rate: Crape myrtle, none detected; Camphor, 0.03; Aleppo pine, 0.15; Deodar cedar, 0.29; Italian Stone pine, 0.42; Monterey pine, 0.90; Brazilian pepper, 1.3; Canary Island pine, 1.7; Ginkgo, 3.0; California pepper, 3.7; Liquidambar, 37; Carrotwood, 49. In addition to the emission rates per unit biomass, the biomass per tree must be factored into any assessment of the relative merits of the various trees, since some trees have higher biomass constants than others. The present data shows that there are large differences in emission rates among different tree species and this should be factored into decision-making as to which shade trees to plant. Based solely on the presently determined emission rates, the Crape myrtle and Camphor tree are good choices for large-scale planting, while the Carrotwood tree and Liquidambar are poor choices due to their high isoprene emission rates.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100140,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Atmospheric Environment. Part B. Urban Atmosphere\",\"volume\":\"26 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 339-348\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0957-1272(92)90009-H\",\"citationCount\":\"72\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Atmospheric Environment. Part B. Urban Atmosphere\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/095712729290009H\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Atmospheric Environment. Part B. Urban Atmosphere","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/095712729290009H","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 72

摘要

目前正在讨论在城市地区大规模种植遮荫树以抵消热岛效应和尽量减少能源使用的问题。在对这一计划进行成本/效益分析时,需要考虑的成本之一是这些树木的排放可能会在大气中产生额外的活性有机化合物。在这个项目中,对洛杉矶空气盆地的15种潜在遮荫树进行了研究,并确定了其中11种树的排放率,另外一种树(紫薇)没有可检测到的排放率。经30℃校正后,按干叶重归一化的排放率依次为(单位:μg−1 h−1),排放率从低到高依次为:紫薇,未检测到;樟脑,0.03;阿勒颇松,0.15;雪松,0.29;意大利石松,0.42;蒙特利松,0.90;巴西辣椒,1.3;加那利岛松树,1.7;银杏,3.0;加州辣椒,3.7分;37岁的香;Carrotwood 49。除了每单位生物量的排放率外,每棵树的生物量必须考虑到各种树木的相对优点的任何评估,因为有些树木的生物量常数比其他树木高。目前的数据表明,不同树种之间的排放率有很大差异,在决定种植哪种遮荫树时应考虑到这一点。仅从目前确定的排放率来看,紫薇和樟树是大规模种植的好选择,而由于异戊二烯排放率高,红杨树和枫香树是不理想的选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Hydrocarbon emissions from twelve urban shade trees of the Los Angeles, California, Air Basin

The large-scale planting of shade trees in urban areas to counteract heat-island effects and to minimize energy use is currently being discussed. Among the costs to be considered in a cost/benefit analysis of such a program is the potential for additional reactive organic compounds in the atmosphere due to emissions from these trees. In this program, 15 species of potential shade trees for the Los Angeles Air Basin were studied and emission rates were determined for 11 of these trees, with one further tree (Crape myrtle) exhibiting no detectable emissions. The emission rates normalized to dry leaf weight and corrected to 30°C were (in μg g−1 h−1), ranked from lowest to highest emission rate: Crape myrtle, none detected; Camphor, 0.03; Aleppo pine, 0.15; Deodar cedar, 0.29; Italian Stone pine, 0.42; Monterey pine, 0.90; Brazilian pepper, 1.3; Canary Island pine, 1.7; Ginkgo, 3.0; California pepper, 3.7; Liquidambar, 37; Carrotwood, 49. In addition to the emission rates per unit biomass, the biomass per tree must be factored into any assessment of the relative merits of the various trees, since some trees have higher biomass constants than others. The present data shows that there are large differences in emission rates among different tree species and this should be factored into decision-making as to which shade trees to plant. Based solely on the presently determined emission rates, the Crape myrtle and Camphor tree are good choices for large-scale planting, while the Carrotwood tree and Liquidambar are poor choices due to their high isoprene emission rates.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Meteorologically adjusted ozone trends in urban areas: A probabilistic approach Model for traffic emissions estimation Characterization of outdoor submicron particles and selected combustion sources of indoor particles Atmospheric turbidity and transmittance of solar radiation in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia Modeling of photochemical pollution in Athens, Greece. Application of the RAMS-CALGRID modeling system
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1