建筑系学生设计过程中脑-学习生理与概念化方法的关系[j]

A. Mahmoodi, Mahyar Bastani
{"title":"建筑系学生设计过程中脑-学习生理与概念化方法的关系[j]","authors":"A. Mahmoodi, Mahyar Bastani","doi":"10.1386/adch_00060_1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The importance of the design process in architecture is one of the most popular subjects for the researchers in this field. By reviewing the literature on the subject of design methods in architecture, the authors suggested a model of four types of conceptual design: analogical, typological, pragmatic and theoretical. Also, based on the previous studies of brain dominancy, individuals can be divided into four main groups. In order to find the relation between brain dominancy of architecture students and their preferred conceptualization methods in design, over 350 students of architecture participated in this research in Iran. Using Ned Herrmann’s brain physiology model, the findings concluded that the participants who use their A quadrant of brain prefer pragmatic and theoretical approaches. The preference of participants with B and C quarter-brain dominance is respectively typological and theoretical methods. Participants who use their D quadrant of brain prefer analogical and theoretical methods.","PeriodicalId":42996,"journal":{"name":"Art Design & Communication in Higher Education","volume":"74 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The relation between brain-learning physiology and conceptualization methods in the design process of architecture students1\",\"authors\":\"A. Mahmoodi, Mahyar Bastani\",\"doi\":\"10.1386/adch_00060_1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The importance of the design process in architecture is one of the most popular subjects for the researchers in this field. By reviewing the literature on the subject of design methods in architecture, the authors suggested a model of four types of conceptual design: analogical, typological, pragmatic and theoretical. Also, based on the previous studies of brain dominancy, individuals can be divided into four main groups. In order to find the relation between brain dominancy of architecture students and their preferred conceptualization methods in design, over 350 students of architecture participated in this research in Iran. Using Ned Herrmann’s brain physiology model, the findings concluded that the participants who use their A quadrant of brain prefer pragmatic and theoretical approaches. The preference of participants with B and C quarter-brain dominance is respectively typological and theoretical methods. Participants who use their D quadrant of brain prefer analogical and theoretical methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42996,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Art Design & Communication in Higher Education\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Art Design & Communication in Higher Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1386/adch_00060_1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"ART\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Art Design & Communication in Higher Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1386/adch_00060_1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ART","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

设计过程在建筑中的重要性是该领域研究人员最热门的课题之一。通过回顾有关建筑设计方法的文献,作者提出了四种类型的概念设计模型:类比型、类型型、实用型和理论型。此外,根据先前对大脑优势的研究,个体可以分为四个主要群体。为了找出建筑系学生的大脑优势与他们在设计中偏爱的概念化方法之间的关系,350多名建筑系学生参加了伊朗的这项研究。利用内德·赫尔曼的大脑生理学模型,研究结果得出结论:使用大脑A象限的参与者更喜欢实用主义和理论方法。B型和C型四分之一脑优势被试的偏好分别是类型学和理论方法。使用大脑D象限的参与者更喜欢类比和理论方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The relation between brain-learning physiology and conceptualization methods in the design process of architecture students1
The importance of the design process in architecture is one of the most popular subjects for the researchers in this field. By reviewing the literature on the subject of design methods in architecture, the authors suggested a model of four types of conceptual design: analogical, typological, pragmatic and theoretical. Also, based on the previous studies of brain dominancy, individuals can be divided into four main groups. In order to find the relation between brain dominancy of architecture students and their preferred conceptualization methods in design, over 350 students of architecture participated in this research in Iran. Using Ned Herrmann’s brain physiology model, the findings concluded that the participants who use their A quadrant of brain prefer pragmatic and theoretical approaches. The preference of participants with B and C quarter-brain dominance is respectively typological and theoretical methods. Participants who use their D quadrant of brain prefer analogical and theoretical methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
‘How can I say this politely?’: Remodelling peer critiquing in design education and revealing compassionate critiques Identity and empathy: Pushing boundaries and transgressing barriers Introduction to Design Education: Theory, Research, and Practical Applications for Educators, Steven Faerm (2023) A photo-elicitation as an arts-based method for exploring the experiences of LGBTQ+ students in higher education in Ireland Access and Widening Participation in Arts Higher Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1