护士临床能力与临床表现的横断面研究

Naeimeh Eshraghi Arani, Mohsen Adib Hajbaghery, Ismail Azizi Fini
{"title":"护士临床能力与临床表现的横断面研究","authors":"Naeimeh Eshraghi Arani, Mohsen Adib Hajbaghery, Ismail Azizi Fini","doi":"10.5812/msnj-132816","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In organizational analysis, competence and performance are fundamental issues. To ensure the quality of ‎nursing care, it seems essential to evaluate nurses’ clinical competence (CC) and clinical performance (CP) as the largest group ‎of professionals in the healthcare system. Objectives: This study aimed to examine the ‎CC and CP of nurses and other related factors. Methods: This cross-sectional study involved 220 nurses from various wards of Shahid Beheshti hospital in Kashan, Iran, in 2020. The samples were randomly selected based on the quota assigned to each section (coin toss). Then, 220 selected nurses filled out the CC questionnaire by self-reporting, and among them, the performance of 50 nurses was observed randomly (tossing a coin) in an entire work shift. The data collection tools included a personal information questionnaire and a checklist ‎for evaluating CC and CP. The data were analyzed using SPSS software (version 16; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Data analysis was carried out using descriptive statistical ‎methods, t-tests, analysis of variance, and Spearman and Pearson correlation coefficients. A P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant in all tests. Results: The mean age of the participants was 31.15 ± 6.26 years. Moreover, the participants’ mean scores of work experience and work experience in the current ward ‎were 7.57 ± 5.73 and 4.02 ± 3.88 years, respectively. The nurses’ mean scores of CC and CP were 80.79 ± 12.09 (out of 100) and 70.30 ± 11.94 (out of 100), respectively. Female subjects had a significantly higher mean score in terms of CC than male subjects. Additionally, ‎married nurses had a higher mean score than single nurses (P < 0.05). Nurses in the critical care wards and ‎emergency wards scored the highest (89.09 ± 12.09) and lowest (76.39 ± 12.65) regarding CC, ‎‏respectively, ‏which was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Furthermore, nurses with official employment had the ‎highest mean CC score; nevertheless, nurses with designated employment had the lowest mean CC score, which was statistically ‎significant (P < 0.05). According to the correlation test, nurses’ CC and CP were ‎also associated with age, marital status, work experience in the current ward, and type of employment (P < 0.05).‎ Conclusions: The CP and CC of the nurses participating in this study were satisfactory. Regarding the relationship between the CP score with marital status, workplace sector, employment status, age, ‎general work experience, and current work experience, it is suggested to consider the aforementioned ‎variables in programs for the improvement of nurses’ CP.","PeriodicalId":18480,"journal":{"name":"Medical-Surgical Nursing Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical Competence and Clinical Performance of Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study\",\"authors\":\"Naeimeh Eshraghi Arani, Mohsen Adib Hajbaghery, Ismail Azizi Fini\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/msnj-132816\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: In organizational analysis, competence and performance are fundamental issues. To ensure the quality of ‎nursing care, it seems essential to evaluate nurses’ clinical competence (CC) and clinical performance (CP) as the largest group ‎of professionals in the healthcare system. Objectives: This study aimed to examine the ‎CC and CP of nurses and other related factors. Methods: This cross-sectional study involved 220 nurses from various wards of Shahid Beheshti hospital in Kashan, Iran, in 2020. The samples were randomly selected based on the quota assigned to each section (coin toss). Then, 220 selected nurses filled out the CC questionnaire by self-reporting, and among them, the performance of 50 nurses was observed randomly (tossing a coin) in an entire work shift. The data collection tools included a personal information questionnaire and a checklist ‎for evaluating CC and CP. The data were analyzed using SPSS software (version 16; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Data analysis was carried out using descriptive statistical ‎methods, t-tests, analysis of variance, and Spearman and Pearson correlation coefficients. A P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant in all tests. Results: The mean age of the participants was 31.15 ± 6.26 years. Moreover, the participants’ mean scores of work experience and work experience in the current ward ‎were 7.57 ± 5.73 and 4.02 ± 3.88 years, respectively. The nurses’ mean scores of CC and CP were 80.79 ± 12.09 (out of 100) and 70.30 ± 11.94 (out of 100), respectively. Female subjects had a significantly higher mean score in terms of CC than male subjects. Additionally, ‎married nurses had a higher mean score than single nurses (P < 0.05). Nurses in the critical care wards and ‎emergency wards scored the highest (89.09 ± 12.09) and lowest (76.39 ± 12.65) regarding CC, ‎‏respectively, ‏which was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Furthermore, nurses with official employment had the ‎highest mean CC score; nevertheless, nurses with designated employment had the lowest mean CC score, which was statistically ‎significant (P < 0.05). According to the correlation test, nurses’ CC and CP were ‎also associated with age, marital status, work experience in the current ward, and type of employment (P < 0.05).‎ Conclusions: The CP and CC of the nurses participating in this study were satisfactory. Regarding the relationship between the CP score with marital status, workplace sector, employment status, age, ‎general work experience, and current work experience, it is suggested to consider the aforementioned ‎variables in programs for the improvement of nurses’ CP.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18480,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Medical-Surgical Nursing Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Medical-Surgical Nursing Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/msnj-132816\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Medical-Surgical Nursing Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/msnj-132816","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:在组织分析中,能力和绩效是基本问题。为了确保护理质量,作为医疗保健系统中最大的专业群体,评估护士的临床能力(CC)和临床表现(CP)似乎是必不可少的。目的:探讨护士的CC和CP及其相关因素。方法:本横断面研究涉及2020年伊朗卡尚Shahid Beheshti医院各病房的220名护士。样本是根据分配给每个部分的配额随机选择的(掷硬币)。然后,选取220名护士以自我报告的方式填写CC问卷,并在其中随机观察50名护士在整个轮班中的表现(投掷硬币)。数据收集工具包括个人信息问卷和用于评估CC和CP的检查表。数据分析使用SPSS软件(版本16;SPSS Inc.,芝加哥,伊利诺伊州,美国)。数据分析采用描述性统计方法、t检验、方差分析、Spearman和Pearson相关系数。p值< 0.05被认为在所有检验中具有统计学意义。结果:参与者平均年龄为31.15±6.26岁。此外,参与者的工作经验和在当前病房工作经验的平均得分分别为7.57±5.73和4.02±3.88年。护士CC和CP的平均得分分别为80.79±12.09(满分100分)和70.30±11.94(满分100分)。女性受试者在CC方面的平均得分显著高于男性受试者。已婚护士的平均得分高于单身护士(P < 0.05)。重症监护病房和急诊科护士在CC、_()方面得分最高(89.09±12.09),最低(76.39±12.65),差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。此外,正式就业的护士的平均CC评分最高;指定职业护士的平均CC评分最低,差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。相关检验显示,护士CC、CP与年龄、婚姻状况、现病区工作经验、就业类型也有相关性(P < 0.05)。结论:参与本研究的护士的CP和CC均令人满意。关于护士CP得分与婚姻状况、工作部门、就业状况、年龄、一般工作经验、当前工作经验的关系,建议在护士CP改善方案中考虑上述变量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical Competence and Clinical Performance of Nurses: A Cross-Sectional Study
Background: In organizational analysis, competence and performance are fundamental issues. To ensure the quality of ‎nursing care, it seems essential to evaluate nurses’ clinical competence (CC) and clinical performance (CP) as the largest group ‎of professionals in the healthcare system. Objectives: This study aimed to examine the ‎CC and CP of nurses and other related factors. Methods: This cross-sectional study involved 220 nurses from various wards of Shahid Beheshti hospital in Kashan, Iran, in 2020. The samples were randomly selected based on the quota assigned to each section (coin toss). Then, 220 selected nurses filled out the CC questionnaire by self-reporting, and among them, the performance of 50 nurses was observed randomly (tossing a coin) in an entire work shift. The data collection tools included a personal information questionnaire and a checklist ‎for evaluating CC and CP. The data were analyzed using SPSS software (version 16; SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL, USA). Data analysis was carried out using descriptive statistical ‎methods, t-tests, analysis of variance, and Spearman and Pearson correlation coefficients. A P-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant in all tests. Results: The mean age of the participants was 31.15 ± 6.26 years. Moreover, the participants’ mean scores of work experience and work experience in the current ward ‎were 7.57 ± 5.73 and 4.02 ± 3.88 years, respectively. The nurses’ mean scores of CC and CP were 80.79 ± 12.09 (out of 100) and 70.30 ± 11.94 (out of 100), respectively. Female subjects had a significantly higher mean score in terms of CC than male subjects. Additionally, ‎married nurses had a higher mean score than single nurses (P < 0.05). Nurses in the critical care wards and ‎emergency wards scored the highest (89.09 ± 12.09) and lowest (76.39 ± 12.65) regarding CC, ‎‏respectively, ‏which was statistically significant (P < 0.05). Furthermore, nurses with official employment had the ‎highest mean CC score; nevertheless, nurses with designated employment had the lowest mean CC score, which was statistically ‎significant (P < 0.05). According to the correlation test, nurses’ CC and CP were ‎also associated with age, marital status, work experience in the current ward, and type of employment (P < 0.05).‎ Conclusions: The CP and CC of the nurses participating in this study were satisfactory. Regarding the relationship between the CP score with marital status, workplace sector, employment status, age, ‎general work experience, and current work experience, it is suggested to consider the aforementioned ‎variables in programs for the improvement of nurses’ CP.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Effectiveness of ACT and DBT-Based Interventions with and without Exercise on Pain Outcomes and Desire for Treatment in Substance-Dependent Patients with Chronic Pain Effect of Self-efficacy-Based Training on Treatment Adherence of Patients with Heart Failure The Effect of an Exercise Program on the Quality of Life in Burn Patients Activities of Daily Living in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Hybrid Concept Analysis Effect of Mobile Health Self-Care Training on Fatigue in Multiple Sclerosis Patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1