住院患者COVID-19治疗的成本效益分析:印度尼西亚巴淡岛医疗保健提供者的视角

Mesa Sukmadani Rusdi, Yusvina -, D. Dillasamola, Mariam Efendi
{"title":"住院患者COVID-19治疗的成本效益分析:印度尼西亚巴淡岛医疗保健提供者的视角","authors":"Mesa Sukmadani Rusdi, Yusvina -, D. Dillasamola, Mariam Efendi","doi":"10.55131/jphd/2023/210223","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The COVID-19 pandemic is a global crisis that has continued to impact health, population, and the economy. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of COVID-19 treatment for hospitalized patients from the perspective of healthcare providers. An observational study was conducted retrospectively by collecting data from medical records of hospitalized COVID-19 patients between April 1 and June 30, 2021. The effectiveness of the therapy was evaluated based on COVID-19 treatment guidelines in Indonesia, by calculating the number of recovered patients within 14 days. The study only considered the direct medical costs of treatment, while the cost-effectiveness was analyzed using Average Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ACER) and Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER). The results showed that the average direct cost of COVID-19 treatment per patient was approximately IDR 28,114,775.52 ± IDR 16,352,597.11. The most effective treatment was Favipiravir + Levofloxacin + N-acetylcysteine, followed by Favipiravir + Levofloxacin + Azithromycin + N-acetylcysteine, with 97% and 91% effectiveness, respectively. The ACER of COVID-19 treatments ranged from Rp 15,596,973 to 58,140,864, while the ICER was mainly located in the South East Quadrant, with Favipiravir + Levofloxacin + N-acetylcysteine being dominant compared to other treatments, saving IDR 161,653.97 to 33,870,916.17 per recovered patient. Effective COVID-19 treatments for hospitalized patients provide good value for the health system. However, this study was limited by the unavailability of the most recent information on the rapidly evolving pandemic.","PeriodicalId":36393,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Public Health and Development","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cost-effectiveness analysis of COVID-19 treatment for hospitalized patients: a healthcare provider perspective in Batam, Indonesia\",\"authors\":\"Mesa Sukmadani Rusdi, Yusvina -, D. Dillasamola, Mariam Efendi\",\"doi\":\"10.55131/jphd/2023/210223\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The COVID-19 pandemic is a global crisis that has continued to impact health, population, and the economy. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of COVID-19 treatment for hospitalized patients from the perspective of healthcare providers. An observational study was conducted retrospectively by collecting data from medical records of hospitalized COVID-19 patients between April 1 and June 30, 2021. The effectiveness of the therapy was evaluated based on COVID-19 treatment guidelines in Indonesia, by calculating the number of recovered patients within 14 days. The study only considered the direct medical costs of treatment, while the cost-effectiveness was analyzed using Average Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ACER) and Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER). The results showed that the average direct cost of COVID-19 treatment per patient was approximately IDR 28,114,775.52 ± IDR 16,352,597.11. The most effective treatment was Favipiravir + Levofloxacin + N-acetylcysteine, followed by Favipiravir + Levofloxacin + Azithromycin + N-acetylcysteine, with 97% and 91% effectiveness, respectively. The ACER of COVID-19 treatments ranged from Rp 15,596,973 to 58,140,864, while the ICER was mainly located in the South East Quadrant, with Favipiravir + Levofloxacin + N-acetylcysteine being dominant compared to other treatments, saving IDR 161,653.97 to 33,870,916.17 per recovered patient. Effective COVID-19 treatments for hospitalized patients provide good value for the health system. However, this study was limited by the unavailability of the most recent information on the rapidly evolving pandemic.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36393,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Public Health and Development\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Public Health and Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55131/jphd/2023/210223\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Public Health and Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55131/jphd/2023/210223","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

2019冠状病毒病大流行是一场持续影响健康、人口和经济的全球危机。因此,本研究旨在从医疗服务提供者的角度评估COVID-19治疗住院患者的成本-效果。回顾性观察性研究收集2021年4月1日至6月30日住院的COVID-19患者的医疗记录数据。根据印度尼西亚新冠肺炎治疗指南,通过计算14天内康复的患者数量,评估了治疗效果。本研究仅考虑治疗的直接医疗费用,使用平均成本-效果比(ACER)和增量成本-效果比(ICER)分析成本-效果。结果显示,每名患者治疗新冠肺炎的平均直接成本约为28,114,775.52±16,352,597.11印尼盾。以Favipiravir +左氧氟沙星+ n -乙酰半胱氨酸治疗效果最好,其次为Favipiravir +左氧氟沙星+阿奇霉素+ n -乙酰半胱氨酸,有效率分别为97%和91%。COVID-19治疗的ACER范围为15,596,973 - 58,140,864卢比,ICER主要位于东南象限,与其他治疗相比,Favipiravir +左氧氟沙星+ n -乙酰半胱氨酸占主导地位,每位康复患者节省161,653.97 - 33,870,916.17卢比。针对住院患者的有效COVID-19治疗为卫生系统提供了良好的价值。然而,由于无法获得关于这一迅速演变的大流行病的最新信息,这项研究受到了限制。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cost-effectiveness analysis of COVID-19 treatment for hospitalized patients: a healthcare provider perspective in Batam, Indonesia
The COVID-19 pandemic is a global crisis that has continued to impact health, population, and the economy. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of COVID-19 treatment for hospitalized patients from the perspective of healthcare providers. An observational study was conducted retrospectively by collecting data from medical records of hospitalized COVID-19 patients between April 1 and June 30, 2021. The effectiveness of the therapy was evaluated based on COVID-19 treatment guidelines in Indonesia, by calculating the number of recovered patients within 14 days. The study only considered the direct medical costs of treatment, while the cost-effectiveness was analyzed using Average Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ACER) and Incremental Cost-Effectiveness Ratio (ICER). The results showed that the average direct cost of COVID-19 treatment per patient was approximately IDR 28,114,775.52 ± IDR 16,352,597.11. The most effective treatment was Favipiravir + Levofloxacin + N-acetylcysteine, followed by Favipiravir + Levofloxacin + Azithromycin + N-acetylcysteine, with 97% and 91% effectiveness, respectively. The ACER of COVID-19 treatments ranged from Rp 15,596,973 to 58,140,864, while the ICER was mainly located in the South East Quadrant, with Favipiravir + Levofloxacin + N-acetylcysteine being dominant compared to other treatments, saving IDR 161,653.97 to 33,870,916.17 per recovered patient. Effective COVID-19 treatments for hospitalized patients provide good value for the health system. However, this study was limited by the unavailability of the most recent information on the rapidly evolving pandemic.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Public Health and Development
Journal of Public Health and Development Social Sciences-Health (social science)
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
64
期刊最新文献
Factors affecting preventive behaviors for unplanned pregnancy in female high school students Counseling intervention on iron-folic acid adherence and clinical outcomes among pregnant women and women planning to be pregnant: a scoping review Antibiotics Use, Resistance and Self-medication Practices among Healthcare Workers in a Federal Teaching Hospital in Southwest, Nigeria Predictive factors for resilience quotient among village health volunteers in Northern Thailand post-COVID-19 Applying the concept of Thai nutrient profiling as a model for the Thai school lunch planner
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1