改进土耳其seydiemail附近的微地震目录

IF 1.2 4区 地球科学 Q3 GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS Annals of Geophysics Pub Date : 2022-10-03 DOI:10.4401/ag-8736
Evrim Yavuz
{"title":"改进土耳其seydiemail附近的微地震目录","authors":"Evrim Yavuz","doi":"10.4401/ag-8736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In Turkey, two official seismology centers, Bogazici University Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute Regional Earthquake-Tsunami Monitoring Center (KOERI-RETMC) and Republic of Turkey Prime Ministry Disaster Emergency Management Authority (AFAD) announce and share seismic catalogs with the public and international services. According to their seismic network distribution, together with different crustal models and calculation algorithms, obtaining earthquake parameters (location, depth, etc.) could differ between these two centers, especially, affecting source types of the low-magnitude events. Both low-magnitude tectonic events and artificial quakes that originating from open-pit quarry are catalogued by the seismology centers. These two centers announce different source types for the seismic events; therefore, this study focuses on the reliable identification of the micro-seismic events. Magnitude Ml<2.4 177 seismic events commonly identified in KOERI-RETMC and AFAD catalogs are used. Due to the differences between KOERI-RETMC and AFAD seismic catalogs, the “first determination” (FD) was needed to start the discrimination analyses. Then, waveforms of the station SEYD and SEDI are operated by KOERI-RETMC and AFAD were analyzed with four methods (Amplitude Ratio, Complexity, Short Time Fourier Transform and Corner Frequency-Power Spectrum) and two statistical approaches (linear and quadratic discriminant functions) with the use and comparison with FD. Finally, station-based weightings are obtained with all techniques, and the source types of all events are calculated in percent. Generally, the success rates of the methods are calculated over 90%. The reliability increases with the co-usage of many analyses and the application of method-based weighting. Hence, many methods should be used to reliably determine the source types of micro-seismic events. Both centers should make more detailed analyses to identify micro-seismic events and share their reliable and revised catalogs.","PeriodicalId":50766,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Geophysics","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Refining micro-seismic catalogs around Seydişehir, Turkey\",\"authors\":\"Evrim Yavuz\",\"doi\":\"10.4401/ag-8736\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In Turkey, two official seismology centers, Bogazici University Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute Regional Earthquake-Tsunami Monitoring Center (KOERI-RETMC) and Republic of Turkey Prime Ministry Disaster Emergency Management Authority (AFAD) announce and share seismic catalogs with the public and international services. According to their seismic network distribution, together with different crustal models and calculation algorithms, obtaining earthquake parameters (location, depth, etc.) could differ between these two centers, especially, affecting source types of the low-magnitude events. Both low-magnitude tectonic events and artificial quakes that originating from open-pit quarry are catalogued by the seismology centers. These two centers announce different source types for the seismic events; therefore, this study focuses on the reliable identification of the micro-seismic events. Magnitude Ml<2.4 177 seismic events commonly identified in KOERI-RETMC and AFAD catalogs are used. Due to the differences between KOERI-RETMC and AFAD seismic catalogs, the “first determination” (FD) was needed to start the discrimination analyses. Then, waveforms of the station SEYD and SEDI are operated by KOERI-RETMC and AFAD were analyzed with four methods (Amplitude Ratio, Complexity, Short Time Fourier Transform and Corner Frequency-Power Spectrum) and two statistical approaches (linear and quadratic discriminant functions) with the use and comparison with FD. Finally, station-based weightings are obtained with all techniques, and the source types of all events are calculated in percent. Generally, the success rates of the methods are calculated over 90%. The reliability increases with the co-usage of many analyses and the application of method-based weighting. Hence, many methods should be used to reliably determine the source types of micro-seismic events. Both centers should make more detailed analyses to identify micro-seismic events and share their reliable and revised catalogs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":50766,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of Geophysics\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-10-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of Geophysics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-8736\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"地球科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Geophysics","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4401/ag-8736","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"地球科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"GEOCHEMISTRY & GEOPHYSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在土耳其,两个官方地震学中心,博加济奇大学坎迪利天文台和地震研究所区域地震海啸监测中心(KOERI-RETMC)以及土耳其共和国总理灾害应急管理局(AFAD)宣布并与公众和国际服务机构共享地震目录。根据地震台网分布,再加上不同的地壳模型和计算算法,两个中心的地震参数(位置、深度等)的获取可能存在差异,特别是影响低震级事件的震源类型。地震学中心对低震级构造事件和源自露天采石场的人工地震进行了分类。这两个中心公布了地震事件的不同震源类型;因此,本研究的重点是微地震事件的可靠识别。使用KOERI-RETMC和AFAD目录中常见的Ml<2.4级地震事件。由于KOERI-RETMC和AFAD地震目录之间存在差异,因此需要进行“第一次确定”(FD)来开始判别分析。利用KOERI-RETMC和AFAD处理台站SEYD和SEDI的波形,采用幅度比、复杂度、短时傅立叶变换和角频功率谱4种方法和线性和二次判别函数2种统计方法进行分析,并与FD进行比较。最后,使用所有技术获得基于站点的权重,并以百分比计算所有事件的源类型。一般来说,这些方法的成功率都在90%以上。通过多种分析方法的协同使用和基于方法的加权方法的应用,可靠性得到了提高。因此,需要采用多种方法来可靠地确定微地震事件的震源类型。这两个中心都应该进行更详细的分析,以确定微地震事件,并共享其可靠的修订目录。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Refining micro-seismic catalogs around Seydişehir, Turkey
In Turkey, two official seismology centers, Bogazici University Kandilli Observatory and Earthquake Research Institute Regional Earthquake-Tsunami Monitoring Center (KOERI-RETMC) and Republic of Turkey Prime Ministry Disaster Emergency Management Authority (AFAD) announce and share seismic catalogs with the public and international services. According to their seismic network distribution, together with different crustal models and calculation algorithms, obtaining earthquake parameters (location, depth, etc.) could differ between these two centers, especially, affecting source types of the low-magnitude events. Both low-magnitude tectonic events and artificial quakes that originating from open-pit quarry are catalogued by the seismology centers. These two centers announce different source types for the seismic events; therefore, this study focuses on the reliable identification of the micro-seismic events. Magnitude Ml<2.4 177 seismic events commonly identified in KOERI-RETMC and AFAD catalogs are used. Due to the differences between KOERI-RETMC and AFAD seismic catalogs, the “first determination” (FD) was needed to start the discrimination analyses. Then, waveforms of the station SEYD and SEDI are operated by KOERI-RETMC and AFAD were analyzed with four methods (Amplitude Ratio, Complexity, Short Time Fourier Transform and Corner Frequency-Power Spectrum) and two statistical approaches (linear and quadratic discriminant functions) with the use and comparison with FD. Finally, station-based weightings are obtained with all techniques, and the source types of all events are calculated in percent. Generally, the success rates of the methods are calculated over 90%. The reliability increases with the co-usage of many analyses and the application of method-based weighting. Hence, many methods should be used to reliably determine the source types of micro-seismic events. Both centers should make more detailed analyses to identify micro-seismic events and share their reliable and revised catalogs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of Geophysics
Annals of Geophysics 地学-地球化学与地球物理
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Annals of Geophysics is an international, peer-reviewed, open-access, online journal. Annals of Geophysics welcomes contributions on primary research on Seismology, Geodesy, Volcanology, Physics and Chemistry of the Earth, Oceanography and Climatology, Geomagnetism and Paleomagnetism, Geodynamics and Tectonophysics, Physics and Chemistry of the Atmosphere. It provides: -Open-access, freely accessible online (authors retain copyright) -Fast publication times -Peer review by expert, practicing researchers -Free of charge publication -Post-publication tools to indicate quality and impact -Worldwide media coverage. Annals of Geophysics is published by Istituto Nazionale di Geofisica e Vulcanologia (INGV), nonprofit public research institution.
期刊最新文献
Investigating Mt. Etna lava fountains by seismic and infrasonic signals: 14-21 February 2021 case study Integration of Microtremor and PS-INSAR Analysis to Investigate the Susceptible Area in the Pronojiwo District (Indonesia) Following the 2021 East Java M6.1 Earthquake Behind the Italian catalogues: overlooked but far from negligible earthquakes Understanding the structure of crust and shallow upper mantle beneath western Tibet through the joint inversion of Rayleigh wave group velocity dispersion with interpolated receiver functions Scintillation Climatology from a Software Defined Radio Receiver over Antarctica
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1