电子政务统一模型:基于元分析的系统文献综述

IF 0.6 Q3 MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology Pub Date : 2023-07-27 DOI:10.47836/pjst.31.5.26
Rakib Ahmed Saleh, Rozi Nor Haizan Nor, Md. Tariqul Islam, Y. Y. Jusoh, Salfarina Abdullah
{"title":"电子政务统一模型:基于元分析的系统文献综述","authors":"Rakib Ahmed Saleh, Rozi Nor Haizan Nor, Md. Tariqul Islam, Y. Y. Jusoh, Salfarina Abdullah","doi":"10.47836/pjst.31.5.26","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The unified Model of Electronic Government Adoption (UMEGA) was developed to bring novel insight into the context of citizen adoption of e-government services. As UMEGA is a recently evolved model, it demonstrates unequivocally the necessity for evaluating this model tailored to adopting e-government from the citizens’ perspective. The current study aims to perform a systematic literature review on the empirical validation of the UMEGA accomplished in several countries since its inception in 2017 by following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PRISMA is performed to synthesize the findings and analyze the performance of the constructs of the UMEGA. The systematic literature review encompassed the general characteristics, overall descriptive statistics, and synthesis of the constructs, analytical tools, and findings of the selected empirical articles. In the present study, the meta-analysis offered a strong confidence and prediction interval and significant combined effect size, suggesting that the constructs of the UMEGA, namely, performance expectancy, social influence, perceived risk, and facilitating conditions, significantly influenced attitude and behavioral intention to use e-government services. The association between attitude and behavioral intention is also found to be significant. The heterogeneity of the true effect of behavioral intention among empirical studies was partially explained by subgrouping in terms of sampling techniques, and E-government Development Index (EGDI) moderated the association between attitude and behavioral intention. The current study’s findings can serve as a solid foundation for knowledge expansion, easing the way for theoretical development and helping the government understand what aspects need to be considered while establishing initiatives to enhance the utilization of e-government services.","PeriodicalId":46234,"journal":{"name":"Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology","volume":"87 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Unified Model of Electronic Government Adoption (UMEGA): A Systematic Literature Review with Meta-Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Rakib Ahmed Saleh, Rozi Nor Haizan Nor, Md. Tariqul Islam, Y. Y. Jusoh, Salfarina Abdullah\",\"doi\":\"10.47836/pjst.31.5.26\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The unified Model of Electronic Government Adoption (UMEGA) was developed to bring novel insight into the context of citizen adoption of e-government services. As UMEGA is a recently evolved model, it demonstrates unequivocally the necessity for evaluating this model tailored to adopting e-government from the citizens’ perspective. The current study aims to perform a systematic literature review on the empirical validation of the UMEGA accomplished in several countries since its inception in 2017 by following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PRISMA is performed to synthesize the findings and analyze the performance of the constructs of the UMEGA. The systematic literature review encompassed the general characteristics, overall descriptive statistics, and synthesis of the constructs, analytical tools, and findings of the selected empirical articles. In the present study, the meta-analysis offered a strong confidence and prediction interval and significant combined effect size, suggesting that the constructs of the UMEGA, namely, performance expectancy, social influence, perceived risk, and facilitating conditions, significantly influenced attitude and behavioral intention to use e-government services. The association between attitude and behavioral intention is also found to be significant. The heterogeneity of the true effect of behavioral intention among empirical studies was partially explained by subgrouping in terms of sampling techniques, and E-government Development Index (EGDI) moderated the association between attitude and behavioral intention. The current study’s findings can serve as a solid foundation for knowledge expansion, easing the way for theoretical development and helping the government understand what aspects need to be considered while establishing initiatives to enhance the utilization of e-government services.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46234,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology\",\"volume\":\"87 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47836/pjst.31.5.26\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47836/pjst.31.5.26","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

电子政务采用统一模型(UMEGA)的开发是为了对公民采用电子政务服务的背景提出新的见解。由于UMEGA是一个最近才发展起来的模式,它明确地表明了从公民的角度来评估这种适合于采用电子政务的模式的必要性。本研究旨在按照系统评价和荟萃分析(PRISMA)指南的首选报告项目,对自2017年启动以来在几个国家完成的UMEGA的实证验证进行系统的文献综述。进行PRISMA以综合研究结果并分析UMEGA构建体的性能。系统的文献综述包括一般特征、总体描述性统计、结构综合、分析工具和所选实证文章的发现。在本研究中,meta分析提供了较强的置信区间和预测区间,并提供了显著的联合效应量,表明UMEGA的构式即绩效期望、社会影响、感知风险和便利条件显著影响电子政务服务的态度和行为意愿。态度和行为意向之间的关联也被发现是显著的。实证研究中行为意向真实效果的异质性可以通过抽样技术的亚分组得到部分解释,电子政务发展指数(EGDI)调节了态度与行为意向之间的关联。本研究结果可作为知识拓展的坚实基础,为理论发展铺平道路,并帮助政府了解在制定提高电子政务服务利用率的举措时需要考虑哪些方面。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Unified Model of Electronic Government Adoption (UMEGA): A Systematic Literature Review with Meta-Analysis
The unified Model of Electronic Government Adoption (UMEGA) was developed to bring novel insight into the context of citizen adoption of e-government services. As UMEGA is a recently evolved model, it demonstrates unequivocally the necessity for evaluating this model tailored to adopting e-government from the citizens’ perspective. The current study aims to perform a systematic literature review on the empirical validation of the UMEGA accomplished in several countries since its inception in 2017 by following Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. PRISMA is performed to synthesize the findings and analyze the performance of the constructs of the UMEGA. The systematic literature review encompassed the general characteristics, overall descriptive statistics, and synthesis of the constructs, analytical tools, and findings of the selected empirical articles. In the present study, the meta-analysis offered a strong confidence and prediction interval and significant combined effect size, suggesting that the constructs of the UMEGA, namely, performance expectancy, social influence, perceived risk, and facilitating conditions, significantly influenced attitude and behavioral intention to use e-government services. The association between attitude and behavioral intention is also found to be significant. The heterogeneity of the true effect of behavioral intention among empirical studies was partially explained by subgrouping in terms of sampling techniques, and E-government Development Index (EGDI) moderated the association between attitude and behavioral intention. The current study’s findings can serve as a solid foundation for knowledge expansion, easing the way for theoretical development and helping the government understand what aspects need to be considered while establishing initiatives to enhance the utilization of e-government services.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology
Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology MULTIDISCIPLINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
16.70%
发文量
178
期刊介绍: Pertanika Journal of Science and Technology aims to provide a forum for high quality research related to science and engineering research. Areas relevant to the scope of the journal include: bioinformatics, bioscience, biotechnology and bio-molecular sciences, chemistry, computer science, ecology, engineering, engineering design, environmental control and management, mathematics and statistics, medicine and health sciences, nanotechnology, physics, safety and emergency management, and related fields of study.
期刊最新文献
Estimation of Leachate Volume and Treatment Cost Avoidance Through Waste Segregation Programme in Malaysia Understanding the Degradation of Carbofuran in Agricultural Area: A Review of Fate, Metabolites, and Toxicity Phenolics-Enhancing Piper sarmentosum (Roxburgh) Extracts Pre-Treated with Supercritical Carbon Dioxide and its Correlation with Cytotoxicity and α-Glucosidase Inhibitory Activities Comparison Using Intelligent Systems for Data Prediction and Near Miss Detection Techniques Investigation of Blended Seaweed Waste Recycling Using Black Soldier Fly Larvae
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1