结构信用损失分布估计量的鲁棒性

IF 0.3 4区 经济学 Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Journal of Credit Risk Pub Date : 2015-06-08 DOI:10.21314/JCR.2015.193
Enrique Eugenio Batiz‐Zuk, G. Christodoulakis, S. Poon
{"title":"结构信用损失分布估计量的鲁棒性","authors":"Enrique Eugenio Batiz‐Zuk, G. Christodoulakis, S. Poon","doi":"10.21314/JCR.2015.193","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper provides Monte Carlo results for the performance of the method of moments (MM), maximum likelihood (ML) and ordinary least squares (OLS) estimators of the credit loss distribution implied by the Merton (1974) and Vasicek (1987, 2002) framework when the common or idiosyncratic asset-return factor is non-Gaussian and, thus, the true credit loss distribution deviates from the theoretical one. We find that OLS and ML outperform MM in small samples when the true data-generating process comprises a non-Gaussian common factor. This result intensifies as the sample size increases and holds in all cases. We also find that all three estimators present a large bias and variance when the true data-generating process comprises a non-Gaussian idiosyncratic factor. This last result holds independently of the sample size, across different asset correlation levels, and it intensifies for positive shape parameter values.","PeriodicalId":44244,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Credit Risk","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2015-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Robustness of Estimators in Structural Credit Loss Distributions\",\"authors\":\"Enrique Eugenio Batiz‐Zuk, G. Christodoulakis, S. Poon\",\"doi\":\"10.21314/JCR.2015.193\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper provides Monte Carlo results for the performance of the method of moments (MM), maximum likelihood (ML) and ordinary least squares (OLS) estimators of the credit loss distribution implied by the Merton (1974) and Vasicek (1987, 2002) framework when the common or idiosyncratic asset-return factor is non-Gaussian and, thus, the true credit loss distribution deviates from the theoretical one. We find that OLS and ML outperform MM in small samples when the true data-generating process comprises a non-Gaussian common factor. This result intensifies as the sample size increases and holds in all cases. We also find that all three estimators present a large bias and variance when the true data-generating process comprises a non-Gaussian idiosyncratic factor. This last result holds independently of the sample size, across different asset correlation levels, and it intensifies for positive shape parameter values.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44244,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Credit Risk\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2015-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Credit Risk\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21314/JCR.2015.193\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Economics, Econometrics and Finance\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Credit Risk","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21314/JCR.2015.193","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文提供了Merton(1974)和Vasicek(1987, 2002)框架所隐含的信用损失分布的矩量法(MM)、极大似然法(ML)和普通最小二乘(OLS)估计的蒙特卡罗结果,当共同或特殊资产收益因子是非高斯的,从而真实的信用损失分布偏离理论分布时。我们发现,当真实的数据生成过程包含非高斯公因子时,OLS和ML在小样本中优于MM。这个结果随着样本量的增加而增强,并且在所有情况下都成立。我们还发现,当真实的数据生成过程包含非高斯特质因素时,所有三个估计器都呈现出很大的偏差和方差。最后一个结果独立于样本量,跨越不同的资产相关水平,并且对于正形状参数值它会增强。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Robustness of Estimators in Structural Credit Loss Distributions
This paper provides Monte Carlo results for the performance of the method of moments (MM), maximum likelihood (ML) and ordinary least squares (OLS) estimators of the credit loss distribution implied by the Merton (1974) and Vasicek (1987, 2002) framework when the common or idiosyncratic asset-return factor is non-Gaussian and, thus, the true credit loss distribution deviates from the theoretical one. We find that OLS and ML outperform MM in small samples when the true data-generating process comprises a non-Gaussian common factor. This result intensifies as the sample size increases and holds in all cases. We also find that all three estimators present a large bias and variance when the true data-generating process comprises a non-Gaussian idiosyncratic factor. This last result holds independently of the sample size, across different asset correlation levels, and it intensifies for positive shape parameter values.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Credit Risk
Journal of Credit Risk BUSINESS, FINANCE-
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
10
期刊介绍: With the re-writing of the Basel accords in international banking and their ensuing application, interest in credit risk has never been greater. The Journal of Credit Risk focuses on the measurement and management of credit risk, the valuation and hedging of credit products, and aims to promote a greater understanding in the area of credit risk theory and practice. The Journal of Credit Risk considers submissions in the form of research papers and technical papers, on topics including, but not limited to: Modelling and management of portfolio credit risk Recent advances in parameterizing credit risk models: default probability estimation, copulas and credit risk correlation, recoveries and loss given default, collateral valuation, loss distributions and extreme events Pricing and hedging of credit derivatives Structured credit products and securitizations e.g. collateralized debt obligations, synthetic securitizations, credit baskets, etc. Measuring managing and hedging counterparty credit risk Credit risk transfer techniques Liquidity risk and extreme credit events Regulatory issues, such as Basel II, internal ratings systems, credit-scoring techniques and credit risk capital adequacy.
期刊最新文献
Understanding and predicting systemic corporate distress: a machine-learning approach Managerial connections and corporate risk-taking: evidence from the Great Recession Instabilities in Cox proportional hazards models in credit risk Calibration alternatives to logistic regression and their potential for transferring the statistical dispersion of discriminatory power into uncertainties in probabilities of default Small and medium-sized enterprises’ time to default: an analysis using an improved mixture cure model with time-varying covariates
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1