挪威毒品改革的新举措?最近的三个最高法院案件涉及对毒品犯罪的判决

Pub Date : 2022-05-12 DOI:10.15845/bjclcj.v10i1.3687
Jørn Jacobsen, Victoria Westrum
{"title":"挪威毒品改革的新举措?最近的三个最高法院案件涉及对毒品犯罪的判决","authors":"Jørn Jacobsen, Victoria Westrum","doi":"10.15845/bjclcj.v10i1.3687","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Our previous article ‘Status report: A Norwegian decriminalisation of use and possession of drugs?’ in Volume 9 no. 1 of Bergen Journal of Criminal Law and Criminal Justice described the situation of the drug reform as of June 2021. At that time, of our last report, it was hard to predict the future development within this area. The Parliament’s deliberations did not result in any on decriminalistion of use and possession of drugs, nor on any threshold values for differentiating the sentencing. Two of the three political parties that rejected the proposed reform, the Labour Party and the Centre Party, are now in power.1 A more restricted reform has been suggested, but not (yet, at least) proposed for the Parliament. A much-debated issue is to what extent section 98 of the Norwegian Constitution, stating that ‘[a]ll people are equal under the law’ and ‘[n]o human being must be subject to unfair or disproportionate differential treatment’, allows for decriminalisation only for specific groups, that is; for drug addicts.","PeriodicalId":0,"journal":{"name":"","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2022-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"New steps towards a Norwegian drug reform? Three recent Supreme Court cases concerning sentencing for drug crimes\",\"authors\":\"Jørn Jacobsen, Victoria Westrum\",\"doi\":\"10.15845/bjclcj.v10i1.3687\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Our previous article ‘Status report: A Norwegian decriminalisation of use and possession of drugs?’ in Volume 9 no. 1 of Bergen Journal of Criminal Law and Criminal Justice described the situation of the drug reform as of June 2021. At that time, of our last report, it was hard to predict the future development within this area. The Parliament’s deliberations did not result in any on decriminalistion of use and possession of drugs, nor on any threshold values for differentiating the sentencing. Two of the three political parties that rejected the proposed reform, the Labour Party and the Centre Party, are now in power.1 A more restricted reform has been suggested, but not (yet, at least) proposed for the Parliament. A much-debated issue is to what extent section 98 of the Norwegian Constitution, stating that ‘[a]ll people are equal under the law’ and ‘[n]o human being must be subject to unfair or disproportionate differential treatment’, allows for decriminalisation only for specific groups, that is; for drug addicts.\",\"PeriodicalId\":0,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15845/bjclcj.v10i1.3687\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15845/bjclcj.v10i1.3687","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们之前的文章“现状报告:挪威是否将使用和持有毒品合法化?”第9卷第2页。卑尔根刑法与刑事司法杂志1描述了截至2021年6月的毒品改革情况。在我们上次报告的时候,很难预测这个领域的未来发展。议会的审议没有就使用和拥有毒品的非刑事化问题产生任何意见,也没有就区别量刑的阈值问题产生任何意见。反对改革的三个政党中的两个,工党和中间党,现在已经执政有人提出了一项更严格的改革,但(至少)尚未向议会提出。一个备受争议的问题是,挪威宪法第98条规定“所有人在法律下一律平等”和“任何人都不应受到不公平或不成比例的差别待遇”,这在多大程度上允许只对特定群体进行除罪化,也就是说;为瘾君子准备的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
New steps towards a Norwegian drug reform? Three recent Supreme Court cases concerning sentencing for drug crimes
Our previous article ‘Status report: A Norwegian decriminalisation of use and possession of drugs?’ in Volume 9 no. 1 of Bergen Journal of Criminal Law and Criminal Justice described the situation of the drug reform as of June 2021. At that time, of our last report, it was hard to predict the future development within this area. The Parliament’s deliberations did not result in any on decriminalistion of use and possession of drugs, nor on any threshold values for differentiating the sentencing. Two of the three political parties that rejected the proposed reform, the Labour Party and the Centre Party, are now in power.1 A more restricted reform has been suggested, but not (yet, at least) proposed for the Parliament. A much-debated issue is to what extent section 98 of the Norwegian Constitution, stating that ‘[a]ll people are equal under the law’ and ‘[n]o human being must be subject to unfair or disproportionate differential treatment’, allows for decriminalisation only for specific groups, that is; for drug addicts.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1