{"title":"对民主的批判性审视","authors":"Alexandra Filindra","doi":"10.1017/rep.2021.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The erosion of democratic norms and institutions continues to be top-of-mind for scholars of race and ethnic politics. In the United States, we witnessed a contested transition of the presidency from Republican Donald Trump to Democrat Joe Biden. Challenges to the 2020 election continue unabated. Democracy and inclusion are also the focus of several of the contributions in this issue of JREP. First, Sara W. Goodman and Hannah M. Alarian show that underlying notions of national identity and who should be included as a member of the polity also shape citizens ’ preferences for multiculturalism. Across 35 advanced democracies, the authors show that in places where national identity is defined in aspirational not ascriptive terms, the public supports multiculturalism. asking whether outgroup prejudice dampens the value that white Americans ascribe to democracy and institutions. whites are likely less prejudiced whites to the values of separation of powers and even support military underscore the of democracy when partisan elites notch up nativist and racist appeals a means to win elections.","PeriodicalId":37190,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Race, Ethnicity and Politics","volume":"89 1 1","pages":"303 - 304"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A critical examination of democracy\",\"authors\":\"Alexandra Filindra\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/rep.2021.18\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The erosion of democratic norms and institutions continues to be top-of-mind for scholars of race and ethnic politics. In the United States, we witnessed a contested transition of the presidency from Republican Donald Trump to Democrat Joe Biden. Challenges to the 2020 election continue unabated. Democracy and inclusion are also the focus of several of the contributions in this issue of JREP. First, Sara W. Goodman and Hannah M. Alarian show that underlying notions of national identity and who should be included as a member of the polity also shape citizens ’ preferences for multiculturalism. Across 35 advanced democracies, the authors show that in places where national identity is defined in aspirational not ascriptive terms, the public supports multiculturalism. asking whether outgroup prejudice dampens the value that white Americans ascribe to democracy and institutions. whites are likely less prejudiced whites to the values of separation of powers and even support military underscore the of democracy when partisan elites notch up nativist and racist appeals a means to win elections.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37190,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Race, Ethnicity and Politics\",\"volume\":\"89 1 1\",\"pages\":\"303 - 304\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Race, Ethnicity and Politics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/rep.2021.18\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Race, Ethnicity and Politics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/rep.2021.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
对种族和民族政治学者来说,民主规范和制度的侵蚀仍然是头等大事。在美国,我们目睹了总统职位从共和党人唐纳德·特朗普到民主党人乔·拜登的有争议的过渡。2020年大选面临的挑战依然有增无减。民主和包容也是本期《人民日报》几篇文章的重点。首先,萨拉·w·古德曼(Sara W. Goodman)和汉娜·m·阿拉利安(Hannah M. Alarian)表明,国家认同和谁应该被纳入政体成员的潜在概念也影响了公民对多元文化主义的偏好。在35个先进的民主国家中,作者表明,在国家认同以志向而非归属的术语定义的地方,公众支持多元文化主义。询问群体外偏见是否会削弱美国白人赋予民主和制度的价值。白人可能对三权分立的价值观不那么有偏见,甚至支持军事,当党派精英们把本土主义者和种族主义者的呼吁作为赢得选举的手段时,这突显了民主的重要性。
The erosion of democratic norms and institutions continues to be top-of-mind for scholars of race and ethnic politics. In the United States, we witnessed a contested transition of the presidency from Republican Donald Trump to Democrat Joe Biden. Challenges to the 2020 election continue unabated. Democracy and inclusion are also the focus of several of the contributions in this issue of JREP. First, Sara W. Goodman and Hannah M. Alarian show that underlying notions of national identity and who should be included as a member of the polity also shape citizens ’ preferences for multiculturalism. Across 35 advanced democracies, the authors show that in places where national identity is defined in aspirational not ascriptive terms, the public supports multiculturalism. asking whether outgroup prejudice dampens the value that white Americans ascribe to democracy and institutions. whites are likely less prejudiced whites to the values of separation of powers and even support military underscore the of democracy when partisan elites notch up nativist and racist appeals a means to win elections.