非正式垃圾收集者业务特征的比较分析——以尼日利亚伊巴丹和阿布贾为例

A. Ola, R. Suleiman
{"title":"非正式垃圾收集者业务特征的比较分析——以尼日利亚伊巴丹和阿布贾为例","authors":"A. Ola, R. Suleiman","doi":"10.36108/ujees/2202.40.0240","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Informal waste collectors (IWCs) have been visible actors in the municipal waste management sector of many cities in Nigeria. Various studies have made attempts to study the operational characteristics of IWCs, however, less emphasis has been made to examine the variations in their operational characteristics across cities in Nigeria. This paper attempts to fill this gap using Ibadan (Oyo State) and Abuja (FCT) as examples. The choice of the two cities was informed by the variation in their access to waste management resources. While Abuja is a federal government-controlled municipality with more resources, Ibadan is a state-controlled municipality with fewer resources. A structured questionnaire was randomly administered to 418 IWCs in both cities. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used in the analysis of the data collected. Abuja IWCs evacuated more waste daily (312 kg) than Ibadan (255 kg). All the sampled Abuja IWCs (100%) used push carts to evacuate wastes while 78.5% of Ibadan IWCs used push carts; Abuja IWCs earned more income (N7,500 daily) compared to Ibadan (N3,000 daily). There was preponderant use of public stationary containers for waste disposal by Abuja IWCs than Ibadan. Few Ibadan IWCs used personal protective equipment (PPE) compared to Abuja. Regression analysis showed that the volume of waste collected by IWCs is influenced by the waste collection fees, method of waste transportation and distance between the collection points and disposal sites. It is therefore recommended that adequate provision of public stationary containers will encourage better waste disposal among the IWCs.","PeriodicalId":23413,"journal":{"name":"UNIOSUN Journal of Engineering and Environmental Sciences","volume":"21 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A Comparative Analysis of the Operational Characteristics of Informal Waste Collectors: The Case of Ibadan and Abuja, Nigeria\",\"authors\":\"A. Ola, R. Suleiman\",\"doi\":\"10.36108/ujees/2202.40.0240\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Informal waste collectors (IWCs) have been visible actors in the municipal waste management sector of many cities in Nigeria. Various studies have made attempts to study the operational characteristics of IWCs, however, less emphasis has been made to examine the variations in their operational characteristics across cities in Nigeria. This paper attempts to fill this gap using Ibadan (Oyo State) and Abuja (FCT) as examples. The choice of the two cities was informed by the variation in their access to waste management resources. While Abuja is a federal government-controlled municipality with more resources, Ibadan is a state-controlled municipality with fewer resources. A structured questionnaire was randomly administered to 418 IWCs in both cities. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used in the analysis of the data collected. Abuja IWCs evacuated more waste daily (312 kg) than Ibadan (255 kg). All the sampled Abuja IWCs (100%) used push carts to evacuate wastes while 78.5% of Ibadan IWCs used push carts; Abuja IWCs earned more income (N7,500 daily) compared to Ibadan (N3,000 daily). There was preponderant use of public stationary containers for waste disposal by Abuja IWCs than Ibadan. Few Ibadan IWCs used personal protective equipment (PPE) compared to Abuja. Regression analysis showed that the volume of waste collected by IWCs is influenced by the waste collection fees, method of waste transportation and distance between the collection points and disposal sites. It is therefore recommended that adequate provision of public stationary containers will encourage better waste disposal among the IWCs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23413,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"UNIOSUN Journal of Engineering and Environmental Sciences\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"UNIOSUN Journal of Engineering and Environmental Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36108/ujees/2202.40.0240\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"UNIOSUN Journal of Engineering and Environmental Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36108/ujees/2202.40.0240","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在尼日利亚许多城市的城市废物管理部门,非正式废物收集者已成为明显的行动者。各种研究都试图研究iwc的业务特点,但是,较少强调审查尼日利亚各城市间iwc业务特点的差异。本文试图以伊巴丹(奥约州)和阿布贾(FCT)为例填补这一空白。这两个城市的选择是根据它们获得废物管理资源的不同情况作出的。阿布贾是联邦政府控制的城市,拥有更多的资源,而伊巴丹是国家控制的城市,资源较少。随机对两个城市的418家iwc进行结构化问卷调查。对收集到的数据进行分析时采用了描述性统计和推断性统计。阿布贾iwc每天清除的废物(312公斤)比伊巴丹(255公斤)多。抽样的阿布贾iwc(100%)全部使用推车进行废物清除,伊巴丹iwc(78.5%)使用推车进行废物清除;阿布贾iwc的收入(每天7500奈拉)高于伊巴丹iwc(每天3000奈拉)。阿布贾iwc比伊巴丹更多地使用公共固定容器处理废物。与阿布贾相比,伊巴丹的iwc很少使用个人防护装备。回归分析表明,iwc的垃圾收集量受垃圾收集费、垃圾运输方式、收集点与处置点之间距离等因素的影响。因此,建议提供足够的公共固定容器,以鼓励小海洋捕鲸中心更好地处置废物。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A Comparative Analysis of the Operational Characteristics of Informal Waste Collectors: The Case of Ibadan and Abuja, Nigeria
Informal waste collectors (IWCs) have been visible actors in the municipal waste management sector of many cities in Nigeria. Various studies have made attempts to study the operational characteristics of IWCs, however, less emphasis has been made to examine the variations in their operational characteristics across cities in Nigeria. This paper attempts to fill this gap using Ibadan (Oyo State) and Abuja (FCT) as examples. The choice of the two cities was informed by the variation in their access to waste management resources. While Abuja is a federal government-controlled municipality with more resources, Ibadan is a state-controlled municipality with fewer resources. A structured questionnaire was randomly administered to 418 IWCs in both cities. Descriptive and inferential statistics were used in the analysis of the data collected. Abuja IWCs evacuated more waste daily (312 kg) than Ibadan (255 kg). All the sampled Abuja IWCs (100%) used push carts to evacuate wastes while 78.5% of Ibadan IWCs used push carts; Abuja IWCs earned more income (N7,500 daily) compared to Ibadan (N3,000 daily). There was preponderant use of public stationary containers for waste disposal by Abuja IWCs than Ibadan. Few Ibadan IWCs used personal protective equipment (PPE) compared to Abuja. Regression analysis showed that the volume of waste collected by IWCs is influenced by the waste collection fees, method of waste transportation and distance between the collection points and disposal sites. It is therefore recommended that adequate provision of public stationary containers will encourage better waste disposal among the IWCs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Use of GIS for Identifying Optimum Landfill Sites in Osogbo, Southwestern, Nigeria Development of a XLM-Encoded Machine-Readable Dictionary for Yoruba Word Sense Disambiguation Analyzing Cost Risk Indicators for Enhancing Construction Project Delivery Performance Vital Importance of Risk Assessment in Construction Project Procurement Method Selection Towards Sustainable Indoor Thermal Comfort in the Tropical Building Design: Comparative Performance Analysis of Fixed External Shading Elements and Differential Window Glass Thermal Properties
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1