《为生育而战:1925年至1938年意大利法西斯生育运动》

Lauren E. Forcucci
{"title":"《为生育而战:1925年至1938年意大利法西斯生育运动》","authors":"Lauren E. Forcucci","doi":"10.1111/j.1556-5823.2010.00002.x","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The battle for births took place during the inter-war years of 1925 to 1938. The demographic campaign promoted fecunditá, especially within the working class, by increasing welfare benefits, legislating tax breaks, making available better health care, and awarding highly public medals and recognition to those women who produced more than the state's target of five children per family. The regime associated motherhood, children, family, and virility with maintaining national greatness. In spite of all the mass propaganda, mobilization, and state incentives to increase the birthrate, the battle for births had failed by 1938. This article compares and contrasts key economic, regional, political, cultural, and religious explanations for the failure of Italian pronatalism. Although the battle for births failed to produce an overall increase in the Italian birth rates, it did succeed in other ways.</p>","PeriodicalId":100848,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Europe","volume":"10 1","pages":"4-13"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2010-05-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1556-5823.2010.00002.x","citationCount":"14","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Battle for Births: The Fascist Pronatalist Campaign in Italy 1925 to 1938\",\"authors\":\"Lauren E. Forcucci\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/j.1556-5823.2010.00002.x\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The battle for births took place during the inter-war years of 1925 to 1938. The demographic campaign promoted fecunditá, especially within the working class, by increasing welfare benefits, legislating tax breaks, making available better health care, and awarding highly public medals and recognition to those women who produced more than the state's target of five children per family. The regime associated motherhood, children, family, and virility with maintaining national greatness. In spite of all the mass propaganda, mobilization, and state incentives to increase the birthrate, the battle for births had failed by 1938. This article compares and contrasts key economic, regional, political, cultural, and religious explanations for the failure of Italian pronatalism. Although the battle for births failed to produce an overall increase in the Italian birth rates, it did succeed in other ways.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100848,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Europe\",\"volume\":\"10 1\",\"pages\":\"4-13\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2010-05-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1111/j.1556-5823.2010.00002.x\",\"citationCount\":\"14\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Europe\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1556-5823.2010.00002.x\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Society for the Anthropology of Europe","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1556-5823.2010.00002.x","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 14

摘要

出生率之争发生在两次世界大战之间的1925年至1938年。人口运动通过增加福利、立法减免税收、提供更好的医疗保健以及向生育超过国家每户五个孩子目标的妇女颁发高度公开的奖章和表彰,促进了生育能力的提高,特别是在工人阶级中。这个政权把母性、孩子、家庭和男子气概与维护国家的伟大联系在一起。尽管进行了大量的宣传、动员和国家激励措施来提高出生率,但到1938年,争取出生率的斗争还是失败了。本文比较和对比了意大利本土主义失败的主要经济、区域、政治、文化和宗教解释。尽管生育斗争未能使意大利的出生率全面上升,但它在其他方面确实取得了成功。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Battle for Births: The Fascist Pronatalist Campaign in Italy 1925 to 1938

The battle for births took place during the inter-war years of 1925 to 1938. The demographic campaign promoted fecunditá, especially within the working class, by increasing welfare benefits, legislating tax breaks, making available better health care, and awarding highly public medals and recognition to those women who produced more than the state's target of five children per family. The regime associated motherhood, children, family, and virility with maintaining national greatness. In spite of all the mass propaganda, mobilization, and state incentives to increase the birthrate, the battle for births had failed by 1938. This article compares and contrasts key economic, regional, political, cultural, and religious explanations for the failure of Italian pronatalism. Although the battle for births failed to produce an overall increase in the Italian birth rates, it did succeed in other ways.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
News Networks in Seventeenth Century Britain and Europe. Joad Raymond, editor. Jews and Europe in the Twenty-First Century: ‘Thinking Jewish.’ Nick Lambert and David Cesarini. Around the Tuscan Table: Food, Family, and Gender in Twentieth-Century Florence. Carole Counihan. Coming to terms through Cinema: The Lives of Others in Germany's Cultural Landscape of Memory Bulgaria at the Cross-Roads of Post-socialism and EU Membership: Generational Dimensions to European Integration
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1