提示引起的饮酒冲动和酗酒者的唾液分泌:与个体差异的关系

Damaris J Rohsenow , Peter M Monti , David B Abrams , Anthony V Rubonis , Raymond S Niaura , Alan D Sirota , Suzanne M Colby
{"title":"提示引起的饮酒冲动和酗酒者的唾液分泌:与个体差异的关系","authors":"Damaris J Rohsenow ,&nbsp;Peter M Monti ,&nbsp;David B Abrams ,&nbsp;Anthony V Rubonis ,&nbsp;Raymond S Niaura ,&nbsp;Alan D Sirota ,&nbsp;Suzanne M Colby","doi":"10.1016/0146-6402(92)90008-C","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Social learning models of relapse have included a focus on the learned reactions of substance abusers to the presence of substance use cues, but the relative roles played by cue-elicited psychophysiological reactions and urges to use have been unclear. The relationships of these kinds of cue-elicited reactions to each other, to measures of individual differences, to attentional processes, and to relapse are reviewed across three recent studies (published or to be published elsewhere). Alcoholic males who participated in one of three studies were assessed for cue reactivity (salivation and urge to drink while sniffing an alcoholic beverage versus water) as well as individual difference measures. Salivation and urge to drink have a weak or nonsignificant relationship to each other. Cue-elicited urge to drink generally correlates with negative mood, awareness of somatic reactions, attention to alcohol, and enjoyment of the sight and smell of alcohol. Salivation tends not to be related to these conscious processes although it is greater among those who expect more positive effects from alcohol, and among those with more alcohol dependence. Salivation but not urge to drink was predictive of quantity and frequency of drinking during the first three months post-detoxification. Results are generally consistent with appetitive-motivation models of alcohol use and with <span>Tiffany's (1990)</span> hypothesis that automatic processes are more important than conscious processes in drug-use behavior.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":100041,"journal":{"name":"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy","volume":"14 3","pages":"Pages 195-210"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1992-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0146-6402(92)90008-C","citationCount":"97","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Cue elicited urge to drink and salivation in alcoholics: Relationship to individual differences\",\"authors\":\"Damaris J Rohsenow ,&nbsp;Peter M Monti ,&nbsp;David B Abrams ,&nbsp;Anthony V Rubonis ,&nbsp;Raymond S Niaura ,&nbsp;Alan D Sirota ,&nbsp;Suzanne M Colby\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/0146-6402(92)90008-C\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Social learning models of relapse have included a focus on the learned reactions of substance abusers to the presence of substance use cues, but the relative roles played by cue-elicited psychophysiological reactions and urges to use have been unclear. The relationships of these kinds of cue-elicited reactions to each other, to measures of individual differences, to attentional processes, and to relapse are reviewed across three recent studies (published or to be published elsewhere). Alcoholic males who participated in one of three studies were assessed for cue reactivity (salivation and urge to drink while sniffing an alcoholic beverage versus water) as well as individual difference measures. Salivation and urge to drink have a weak or nonsignificant relationship to each other. Cue-elicited urge to drink generally correlates with negative mood, awareness of somatic reactions, attention to alcohol, and enjoyment of the sight and smell of alcohol. Salivation tends not to be related to these conscious processes although it is greater among those who expect more positive effects from alcohol, and among those with more alcohol dependence. Salivation but not urge to drink was predictive of quantity and frequency of drinking during the first three months post-detoxification. Results are generally consistent with appetitive-motivation models of alcohol use and with <span>Tiffany's (1990)</span> hypothesis that automatic processes are more important than conscious processes in drug-use behavior.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100041,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy\",\"volume\":\"14 3\",\"pages\":\"Pages 195-210\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1992-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1016/0146-6402(92)90008-C\",\"citationCount\":\"97\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/014664029290008C\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Advances in Behaviour Research and Therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/014664029290008C","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 97

摘要

复吸的社会学习模型包括关注药物滥用者对药物使用线索的习得反应,但线索引发的心理生理反应和使用冲动所起的相对作用尚不清楚。这些类型的线索引发的反应之间的关系,对个体差异的测量,对注意力过程的关系,以及对复发的关系,在最近的三项研究中进行了回顾(已发表或将在其他地方发表)。研究人员对参与三项研究之一的酗酒男性进行了线索反应性评估(在闻酒精饮料和水时的唾液分泌和饮酒冲动),以及个体差异测量。流涎和喝水的冲动之间的关系很弱或不显著。提示引起的饮酒冲动通常与负面情绪、对身体反应的意识、对酒精的关注以及对酒精的视觉和嗅觉的享受有关。流涎往往与这些有意识的过程无关,尽管在那些期望酒精产生更多积极影响的人和那些更依赖酒精的人中,流涎更明显。在解毒后的前三个月,唾液分泌但不急于饮酒可预测饮酒的数量和频率。结果与酒精使用的食欲-动机模型以及Tiffany(1990)的假设一致,即在药物使用行为中,自动过程比有意识过程更重要。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Cue elicited urge to drink and salivation in alcoholics: Relationship to individual differences

Social learning models of relapse have included a focus on the learned reactions of substance abusers to the presence of substance use cues, but the relative roles played by cue-elicited psychophysiological reactions and urges to use have been unclear. The relationships of these kinds of cue-elicited reactions to each other, to measures of individual differences, to attentional processes, and to relapse are reviewed across three recent studies (published or to be published elsewhere). Alcoholic males who participated in one of three studies were assessed for cue reactivity (salivation and urge to drink while sniffing an alcoholic beverage versus water) as well as individual difference measures. Salivation and urge to drink have a weak or nonsignificant relationship to each other. Cue-elicited urge to drink generally correlates with negative mood, awareness of somatic reactions, attention to alcohol, and enjoyment of the sight and smell of alcohol. Salivation tends not to be related to these conscious processes although it is greater among those who expect more positive effects from alcohol, and among those with more alcohol dependence. Salivation but not urge to drink was predictive of quantity and frequency of drinking during the first three months post-detoxification. Results are generally consistent with appetitive-motivation models of alcohol use and with Tiffany's (1990) hypothesis that automatic processes are more important than conscious processes in drug-use behavior.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Cancer, personality and stress: Prediction and prevention Adolescent family predictors of substance use during early adulthood: A theoretical model Fears in mental retardation: Part one—Types of fears reported by men and women with and without mental retardation UCS-inflation and acquired fear responses in human conditioning Behavioral treatment of obesity: thirty years and counting
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1